Proofreading.education Review

Based on checking the website, Proofreading.education appears to offer professional proofreading and copy-editing services, primarily targeting academic and business clients.

The site emphasizes the expertise of its founder, Gerard Hearne, highlighting his background in photography suggesting a keen eye for detail and his academic qualifications from Lancaster University in Linguistics and English Language.

While the service focuses on enhancing text flow and message conveyance, a thorough review reveals several areas where it falls short compared to more robust and transparent online service providers.

Overall Review Summary:

• Legitimacy: Appears legitimate as a solo professional service, backed by academic credentials and endorsements from Lancaster University.
• Transparency: Lacks comprehensive transparency in pricing, service levels, and turnaround times, which are standard expectations for online services.
• Ease of Use: The “Get Quote” mechanism is the primary interaction, implying a personalized, rather than instant, service.
• Customer Support: No clear information on direct customer support channels e.g., live chat, phone number beyond email for quotes.
• Service Scope: Focused on proofreading and copy-editing, with a strong emphasis on academic texts.
• Ethical Considerations: The service itself proofreading is inherently ethical and beneficial for improving communication. However, the limited online presence and lack of detailed information could be a minor concern for some users seeking complete transparency.
• Recommendation: Caution is advised due to limited readily available information, but the service seems reputable for those who prioritize direct communication and personalized quotes over instant, structured offerings.

The site provides a narrative of how the service began, stemming from Gerard Hearne’s experiences helping fellow international students at Lancaster University.

This personal touch can be reassuring, suggesting a genuine passion for linguistic refinement.

He also lists several prestigious projects he has worked on, lending credibility to his experience.

Most reputable online proofreading services provide these upfront to facilitate quick decision-making.

The reliance on a “Get Quote” button for all inquiries means users must invest time in initiating contact before understanding the full scope or cost, which might deter those seeking immediate solutions.

Furthermore, while reviews are mentioned, a direct, unfiltered display of customer testimonials on the main page would enhance trust.

The service is fundamentally beneficial, aiding in clear communication, but its online presentation could be significantly improved to meet modern expectations of digital service providers.

Best Alternatives for Ethical Proofreading & Writing Services:

1. Scribendi

   • Key Features: Offers a wide range of services including academic editing, essay editing, business editing, and ESL editing. fast turnaround times. large pool of experienced editors. quality guarantee.
   • Average Price: Varies significantly based on word count and turnaround time e.g., $40-$100+ for standard documents.
   • Pros: Highly reputable, diverse services, transparent pricing, multiple delivery speeds, secure platform.
   • Cons: Can be pricey for very large documents or urgent deadlines. quality can vary slightly between editors.

2. Grammarly Business

   • Key Features: AI-powered writing assistant with advanced grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity, engagement, and delivery suggestions. plagiarism checker. style guide adherence.
   • Price: Free basic version. Premium from $12/month. Business from $15/month per user.
   • Pros: Instant feedback, improves writing skills over time, integrates with many platforms, excellent for daily writing needs.
   • Cons: Not a human proofreading service. AI suggestions might not always capture nuanced meaning or complex stylistic choices. premium required for full features.

3. ProofreadingPal

   • Key Features: Two-proofreader model for every document, ensuring higher accuracy. specialized in academic, business, and general proofreading. various turnaround options.
   • Average Price: Competitive, often quoted based on word count and deadline e.g., $0.015 – $0.03 per word.
   • Pros: Double-checked quality control, wide range of services, reliable.
   • Cons: Might be slightly more expensive due to the two-editor model. no free trial.

4. Wordvice

   • Key Features: Focuses on academic, admissions, and research paper editing. experienced editors, many with PhDs. offers certificate of editing.
   • Average Price: Varies by word count and urgency, generally in line with industry standards.
   • Pros: Strong reputation in academic circles, specialized editors, good for non-native English speakers.
   • Cons: Primarily academic focus might not suit all general users. less emphasis on quick, casual proofreading.

5. Editorr

   • Key Features: On-demand professional editing services. live editor availability. suitable for quick checks of emails, documents, or presentations.
   • Price: Subscription-based or pay-per-use, starting from $20 for short documents.
   • Pros: Instant access to editors, ideal for urgent and smaller tasks, convenient.
   • Cons: Can become costly for extensive or ongoing editing needs. not designed for very long documents.

6. Kibin

   • Key Features: Primarily for academic essay editing and proofreading. provides detailed feedback and suggestions. large database of sample essays.
   • Average Price: Subscription model, starting around $9.99/month for unlimited submissions within fair use policy.
   • Pros: Affordable for students with ongoing needs, focuses on improving writing skills, helpful essay database.
   • Cons: Subscription model might not suit one-off users. turnaround times can vary based on editor availability.

7. Cambridge Proofreading

   • Key Features: British English and American English options. covers academic, business, and personal documents. emphasis on highly qualified editors PhDs, Masters.
   • Average Price: Quoted per project based on word count and deadline.
   • Pros: High standard of editing, specialized editors, caters to specific English dialects.
   • Cons: Not as widely known as some larger competitors. pricing is not immediately transparent without a quote.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Understanding Proofreading.education: A Detailed Look

When you’re sifting through online services, the first thing that strikes you about Proofreading.education is its stark simplicity.

Unlike many modern service-based websites that bombard you with pop-ups, animated elements, and a million calls to action, this site is a clean, almost minimalist presentation of a single professional’s offering.

It’s like walking into a well-organized office where the focus is clearly on the work itself, rather than flashy décor.

The Face Behind the Service: Gerard Hearne’s Credentials

The core of Proofreading.education is undoubtedly Gerard Hearne.

The site dedicates significant space to outlining his background and qualifications, which is a smart move for building credibility. He highlights:

• Photography Background: “an ABIPP in Portraiture, also Hon. Sec. of the NW Region for 2 years,” which he links to a “very keen eye for detail.” This is an interesting connection, suggesting that the meticulousness required for visual arts translates directly into the precision needed for text.
• Academic Prowess: A BA Hons in French from Lancaster University and an MA from the Department of Linguistics and English Language LAEL at the same institution. This is a strong foundation, especially the MA in Linguistics, which provides a deep understanding of language structure, usage, and nuance – qualities essential for effective proofreading and copy-editing.
• Lancaster University Affiliation: Being in the “Lancaster University Register of Approved Proofreaders” adds a significant layer of institutional endorsement. This isn’t just self-proclaimed expertise. it’s validated by a reputable academic body.

This emphasis on personal credentials is both a strength and, in some ways, a limitation.

While it builds trust in Gerard as an individual expert, it also positions the service as a solopreneur venture rather than a larger agency with a team of editors, which might be a consideration for clients with very high volume or urgent, simultaneous projects.

The Genesis and Evolution of Proofreading.education

The “How it began” section offers a compelling narrative.

It details how Gerard’s proofreading journey started organically, by helping fellow international students at Lancaster University.

This “snowballed” into requests from roommates, lecturers including those from Lancaster University Management School LUMS, supervisors, and eventually for more significant academic works like master’s dissertations, MBAs, PhD theses, conference papers, and even book manuscripts. Stocktraders.net Review

• Organic Growth: The story of word-of-mouth referrals is a testament to the quality of his early work. Satisfied clients, particularly within an academic environment, are a strong indicator of reliability and effectiveness.
• Prestigious Projects: The site lists several notable projects, including:
  • SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics
  • JECL Sage
  • English Language: Description, Variation and Context Culpeper, Kerswill, Wodak, McEnery & Katamba
  • DYLAN
  • Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change: Insights from the Global North and South Eds: Paul Kerswill, Heike Wiese
  • Metaphor in Discourse, Social Media and Society: Integrating the digital with the social in digital discourse Ed.: Majid KhosraviNik

These specific examples are crucial.

They provide tangible proof of experience with high-level, academic texts and publications, which is invaluable for potential clients in research or publishing.

This background distinguishes Proofreading.education from more generalist proofreading services.

Services Offered and Target Audience

While not explicitly listed as a bulleted “Services” section, the text clarifies the scope:

• Proofreading and Copy-editing: These are the core offerings, aimed at refining English text for clarity, flow, and correctness.
• Diverse Disciplines and Contexts: The site states expertise across “academic, business, commerce, education.” This breadth, coupled with the specialized academic examples, suggests versatility in handling various types of documents.
• Target Audience: Clearly, the primary audience includes academics students, researchers, faculty, authors, and business professionals who need polished English communication. The repeated mention of “fellow students,” “dissertations,” and “book manuscripts” strongly points towards academic writing as a key strength. For instance, proofreading educational materials is a clear area of focus, as evidenced by his work with university-level texts.

Proofreading.education Pros & Cons

Let’s break down what works well and where Proofreading.education might leave users wanting more, especially when compared to the expectations set by larger online service platforms.

Proofreading.education Pros

• Strong Personal Credibility: Gerard Hearne’s academic background from Lancaster University and his specific experience with prestigious academic publications are significant assets. This isn’t a nameless service. there’s a verifiable expert at the helm.
• Demonstrated Expertise in Academic Texts: The listed projects and the narrative of his origins strongly suggest a deep understanding of academic writing conventions and the specific needs of scholars and researchers. This is particularly valuable for users seeking education proofreading jobs or academic assistance.
• Focus on Quality and Detail: His past as a professional photographer, which “requires a very keen eye for detail,” is cleverly linked to the meticulous nature of proofreading. This commitment to precision is a core benefit.
• Personalized Service: The “Get Quote” model implies a direct, one-on-one interaction, which can be highly beneficial for complex or unique projects that require tailored attention. This is a contrast to automated or templated services.
• Endorsement from Lancaster University: Being on their “Register of Approved Proofreaders” is a robust third-party validation that adds a layer of trust.

Proofreading.education Cons

• Absence of Defined Service Levels/Packages: Unlike many competitors, there are no clearly outlined service tiers e.g., basic proofreading, substantive editing, copy-editing packages. This makes it harder for a user to immediately understand what exactly they’re getting for their investment.
• No Information on Turnaround Times: Deadlines are critical, especially in academic or business contexts. The website offers no indication of typical turnaround times e.g., 24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, forcing users to inquire directly.
• Limited Online Reviews/Testimonials Display: While the site mentions “Please see my feedback comments,” there isn’t a dedicated, easily accessible, and sortable section of customer reviews on the main pages. Modern websites often feature dynamic testimonial sections or links to independent review platforms e.g., Trustpilot.
• Minimal Customer Support Information: Beyond the “Get Quote” form, there’s no clear contact phone number, live chat option, or even a dedicated email address for general inquiries. This limits immediate support options.
• Sole Proprietor Model: While a strength in terms of personalized attention, it can also be a perceived weakness for clients requiring very high volume work, quick scaling, or multiple projects simultaneously, where a team of editors might be more efficient.
• Basic Website Design: While clean, the website’s design and functionality are quite basic. It lacks modern features that could enhance user experience, such as a blog with writing tips, a knowledge base, or a clear FAQ section.

How Proofreading.education Compares to Market Standards

To really grasp its positioning, it’s helpful to compare it against industry standards.

Online Presence and User Experience

Most leading proofreading services, such as Scribendi or Grammarly, invest heavily in their online presence. This typically includes:

• Intuitive Navigation: Clear menus, easy-to-find information.
• Instant Quote Tools: Calculators where users input word count and desired turnaround to get an immediate price. This is standard in the industry, offering transparency and efficiency.
• Comprehensive FAQ Sections: Answering common questions about services, pricing, confidentiality, and process.
• Secure Client Portals: For submitting documents, tracking progress, and receiving edited files.
• 24/7 Customer Support: Via chat, email, or phone.

Proofreading.education, by contrast, adopts a more traditional, personalized approach. Its website serves primarily as a digital business card and a means to initiate contact. While this may appeal to clients who prefer direct human interaction and bespoke solutions, it inherently lacks the instant gratification and streamlined process that many digital-first users expect. For someone quickly searching for kobi education proofreading or ace education proofreading and comparing options, the immediate lack of pricing can be a hurdle.

Pricing and Value Proposition

The standard for online proofreading often involves:

• Per-word rates: This allows for clear, scalable pricing.
• Tiered pricing: Based on urgency e.g., 24-hour, 3-day, 1-week turnaround.
• Service Packages: Differentiating between basic proofreading, copy editing, substantive editing, etc., with varying price points.

Proofreading.education’s “Get Quote” model means the value proposition isn’t immediately clear. Apklinker.com Review

While a custom quote can account for project complexity, it requires more effort from the client.

This approach can be seen as less competitive in a market where price transparency is often a key differentiator.

The value here seems to be in the individualized attention and high-level academic expertise, rather than competitive pricing or speed for every project.

Quality Assurance and Editor Vetting

Larger services often boast:

• Rigorous Editor Vetting: Comprehensive tests, minimum experience requirements, and often specific academic qualifications.
• Quality Control Processes: Such as a second review by a different editor like ProofreadingPal’s model or internal quality checks.
• Customer Satisfaction Guarantees: Offering revisions or refunds if expectations aren’t met.

Proofreading.education relies on Gerard Hearne’s personal reputation and credentials, backed by the Lancaster University endorsement.

While this is strong for one individual, it doesn’t convey a systemic quality assurance process that a larger organization might have.

Clients are essentially relying solely on Gerard’s individual expertise and work ethic.

The Process: From Inquiry to Delivery

The “Process” page on Proofreading.education provides a brief overview of how the service works.

It’s concise, which can be good, but it also leaves room for more detailed explanations.

Initial Contact and Quote

The journey for a potential client begins with the “Get Quote” button. This implies a multi-step process: Hantarr.com Review

1. Client Submits Inquiry: The user would likely provide details about their document – type of document essay, dissertation, business report, word count, desired deadline, and perhaps specific areas of concern.
2. Assessment and Quote Generation: Gerard Hearne would then review the inquiry and provide a personalized quote. This allows for tailoring the service to the specific needs and complexity of the text, rather than a generic rate. This can be beneficial for highly specialized proofreading educational materials or complex research papers that might require more than just a quick glance.
3. Agreement and Payment: Once the quote is accepted, payment arrangements would presumably be made. However, the site doesn’t specify payment methods e.g., credit card, PayPal, bank transfer or how payment is securely processed.

The Proofreading Workflow

While not explicitly detailed, the process likely involves:

• Document Submission: Clients would send their text via email or an upload mechanism not clearly defined on the site.
• Careful Review and Adjustment: Gerard Hearne reads the text “with care and make the necessary adjustments to let it flow and convey your message.” This implies not just correcting errors but also improving clarity, coherence, and stylistic consistency, which aligns with copy-editing principles.
• Feedback and Track Changes: It’s standard practice in professional proofreading to use track changes in software like Microsoft Word to allow the client to see all revisions and accept/reject them. The site doesn’t specify if this method is used, but it’s highly probable given the academic context.
• Delivery of Edited Document: The final, polished document is returned to the client within the agreed-upon timeframe.

Post-Service Support

The website doesn’t explicitly mention any post-service support, such as a revision period or a guarantee for satisfaction after the document is returned.

This is an area where more transparency could benefit potential clients.

Many services offer a short window for minor revisions or clarifications if the client has follow-up questions about the edits.

User Experience and Website Navigation

The website, Proofreading.education, is built on a very simple structure, which translates into straightforward navigation but also some limitations.

Navigation Elements

The site’s navigation is minimal and clear, located at the top and bottom of each page:

• Gerard Hearne: Likely links back to the homepage, which focuses on his background and the service.
• Process: Explains how the service works as discussed above.
• Reviews: This is a crucial link, though its content isn’t immediately visible from the homepage. Users would need to click through to see client feedback.
• Get Quote: The primary call to action, leading to an inquiry form.

This lean menu structure means users won’t get lost, but it also means there are fewer dedicated sections for detailed information that a user might seek out, such as a comprehensive FAQ, a blog, or specific service descriptions.

Visual Design and Readability

• Clean and Uncluttered: The design prioritizes text, with minimal graphics. This makes the content easy to read without distractions.
• Font Choice: The fonts appear professional and readable.
• No Obtrusive Elements: There are no pop-ups, intrusive ads, or overly dynamic elements, which contributes to a calm browsing experience.
• Mobile Responsiveness: While not explicitly tested, a modern website is expected to be responsive across different devices. Given its simplicity, it’s likely to adapt well.

However, the design also feels somewhat dated compared to contemporary web standards.

While functionality is prioritized, a more modern aesthetic with engaging visuals could potentially enhance its appeal and professionalism for a wider audience.

The current design might give some users the impression of a very small, perhaps less technologically integrated, operation. Webscreationsdesign.com Review

Proofreading.education Alternatives

When considering alternatives to Proofreading.education, the key is to look at services that offer more comprehensive online features, greater transparency, or a different scale of operation, while still maintaining high ethical standards.

The listed alternatives are all reputable and provide valuable services that align with ethical business practices.

Why Seek Alternatives?

Clients might look for alternatives if they need:

• Instant Pricing: To compare costs immediately without requesting a custom quote.
• Guaranteed Turnaround Times: For urgent projects where deadlines are critical.
• Scalability: If they have a high volume of work or need multiple projects handled simultaneously.
• Diverse Service Levels: To choose between basic proofreading, copy editing, or more intensive substantive editing.
• 24/7 Support: For questions or issues that arise outside of standard business hours.
• Client Portals: For organized document submission, progress tracking, and secure delivery.
• Independent Reviews: To see a broader spectrum of customer feedback on external platforms.

Top Alternatives in Detail:

*   Features: One of the most established online editing services. Offers a wide array of services including academic, business, creative, and personal editing. Known for flexible turnaround times from a few hours to a week or more. They provide a direct quote calculator based on word count and desired delivery.
*   Pros: Highly experienced editors, large capacity, comprehensive service options, clear pricing, excellent for large projects, strong reputation.
*   Cons: Can be more expensive than individual freelancers. quality can vary slightly between editors depending on the specific editor assigned.
*   Use Case: Ideal for students, academics, authors, and businesses needing reliable, professional editing on a wide range of documents, often with specific deadlines.

*   Features: AI-powered writing assistant. While not a human proofreading service, it offers advanced grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity, engagement, and delivery suggestions. The business version includes style guide integration, brand tones, and team management tools. It's an excellent tool for improving writing on the fly.
*   Pros: Instant feedback, improves writing consistency, useful for daily communication, good for teams to maintain a consistent voice, plagiarism checker.
*   Cons: Not a substitute for a human editor for complex or nuanced texts. AI might miss subtle errors or stylistic improvements that a human would catch.
*   Use Case: Excellent for individuals and teams who need real-time writing assistance, consistent brand communication, and a strong first pass before human review. It's a fantastic tool for proofreading educational materials or internal business documents before external sharing.

*   Features: Unique "two-proofreader model" where every document is reviewed by two separate professional proofreaders. This aims to significantly reduce errors and enhance accuracy. Offers academic, business, and general proofreading services.
*   Pros: High accuracy due to double-checking, reputable, variety of turnaround options, strong focus on quality.
*   Cons: Might be slightly more expensive due to the two-editor process. no free trial.
*   Use Case: Best for clients who prioritize maximum accuracy and thoroughness, such as PhD candidates, researchers, or businesses where precision is paramount.

*   Features: Specializes heavily in academic editing, including research papers, dissertations, theses, and admissions essays. Many editors hold PhDs in their respective fields. Offers a certificate of editing, which can be useful for journal submissions.
*   Pros: Expert academic editors, strong industry reputation in research publishing, good for non-native English speakers in academic contexts, covers a broad range of academic fields.
*   Cons: Primarily focused on academic work, so less ideal for general or creative writing. pricing structure might be less flexible for non-academic projects.
*   Use Case: The go-to choice for academics, researchers, and students who need specialized editing for scientific papers, journal articles, or university applications.

*   Features: Provides on-demand professional editing services, allowing users to submit text and get an editor almost instantly. Ideal for quick, short documents like emails, social media posts, or urgent internal communications.
*   Pros: Extremely fast turnaround, convenient for small, urgent tasks, human editors available quickly.
*   Cons: Can be costly for longer documents or continuous use. not designed for comprehensive academic or book-length projects.
*   Use Case: Perfect for busy professionals who need immediate proofreading for short, time-sensitive written communications.

*   Features: Primarily an essay editing and proofreading service for students. Offers detailed feedback on writing style, argumentation, and clarity, not just grammar. Also has a vast library of sample essays.
*   Pros: Affordable subscription model for students, focuses on improving writing skills, useful resource for academic writing examples.
*   Cons: Main focus is on academic essays, not suitable for business or book manuscripts. turnaround times can vary.
*   Use Case: A budget-friendly option for students who need regular assistance with essays and want to improve their writing over time.

*   Features: Offers professional proofreading and editing for academic, business, and personal documents. Emphasizes highly qualified editors, many with Master's and PhD degrees. Provides options for both British and American English.
*   Pros: High standard of editing, qualified editors, caters to specific English dialects, good for formal documents.
*   Cons: Less immediate pricing transparency compared to some competitors. might not be as widely known as the very large services.
*   Use Case: Suitable for clients who require precise, high-quality editing for formal documents, especially those needing to specify a particular English dialect.

Each of these alternatives offers a different blend of features, pricing, and specialization, allowing users to choose the best fit for their specific proofreading and editing needs.

FAQ

What is Proofreading.education?

Proofreading.education is an online service offering professional proofreading and copy-editing, primarily by Gerard Hearne, focusing on academic, business, and general English texts.

Is Proofreading.education a legitimate service?

Yes, based on the website’s information, Proofreading.education appears to be a legitimate service run by Gerard Hearne, whose academic credentials and affiliation with Lancaster University are highlighted.

How does Proofreading.education get a quote for services?

To get a quote from Proofreading.education, you must use the “Get Quote” button on their website, which likely leads to an inquiry form where you can provide details about your document.

Does Proofreading.education offer transparent pricing?

No, Proofreading.education does not offer transparent pricing or rate tables directly on its website.

You need to request a custom quote for your specific project.

What types of documents does Proofreading.education specialize in?

Proofreading.education specializes in academic documents such as master’s dissertations, PhD theses, conference papers, and book manuscripts, as well as general business and educational materials. Monexinternational.com Review

Who is Gerard Hearne?

Gerard Hearne is the professional behind Proofreading.education, holding a BA Hons in French and an MA from the Department of Linguistics and English Language LAEL at Lancaster University, UK.

Is Gerard Hearne affiliated with Lancaster University?

Yes, Gerard Hearne states he is in the “Lancaster University Register of Approved Proofreaders,” indicating an affiliation and endorsement from the university.

Does Proofreading.education provide turnaround times?

The website does not explicitly state typical turnaround times.

This information would likely be provided after you request a quote for your specific project.

How does Proofreading.education compare to services like Scribendi?

Proofreading.education operates on a more personalized, individual professional model, whereas Scribendi is a larger agency offering transparent pricing, various service levels, and a team of editors.

Are there reviews for Proofreading.education available?

The website mentions “Please see my feedback comments” and has a “Reviews” link, suggesting that customer testimonials are available upon navigation to that section.

Does Proofreading.education offer services for non-native English speakers?

Yes, the origin story mentions helping international students from various countries, suggesting the service is well-suited for non-native English speakers.

What is the difference between proofreading and copy-editing as offered by Proofreading.education?

While not explicitly defined on the site, Gerard Hearne states he makes “necessary adjustments to let it flow and convey your message,” which implies both correction of errors proofreading and improvement of clarity and style copy-editing.

Can I submit a business document to Proofreading.education?

Yes, the website states expertise in “academic, business, commerce, education” contexts, indicating that business documents are accepted.

What prestigious projects has Gerard Hearne worked on?

Gerard Hearne has worked on projects such as the SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics and various academic books and journal articles. Thecompliancegroup.net Review

Does Proofreading.education offer a free trial?

There is no mention of a free trial on the Proofreading.education website.

Services typically require a quote before any work commences.

How can I contact Proofreading.education for support?

The primary method of contact for Proofreading.education appears to be through the “Get Quote” form on their website.

No direct email or phone number for general support is publicly listed.

Is Proofreading.education suitable for very large documents like books?

Yes, Gerard Hearne’s experience includes working on “book manuscripts” and “PhD theses,” indicating suitability for large-scale projects.

What payment methods does Proofreading.education accept?

The website does not specify accepted payment methods.

This information would likely be communicated after a quote is provided and accepted.

Does Proofreading.education use track changes in its editing?

While not explicitly stated, professional proofreading services, especially for academic work, typically use track changes in Microsoft Word or similar software for client review.

What are some ethical alternatives to Proofreading.education?

Ethical alternatives include services like Scribendi, Grammarly Business, ProofreadingPal, Wordvice, Editorr, Kibin, and Cambridge Proofreading, all of which offer reputable and ethically sound writing and editing assistance.

Jetsmarter.com Review