Liedetectortest.org Reviews

Based on checking the website, Liedetectortest.org offers polygraph services primarily in the U.K., claiming to provide expert lie detection for various personal and business matters.

While the concept of discerning truth can be appealing in difficult situations, it’s crucial for us to approach such methods with a balanced perspective, especially from a principled standpoint.

Relying on technological tools to uncover truth can be a misguided path.

It’s important to remember that such tests, despite claims of high accuracy, are not infallible and can lead to undue stress, false accusations, and broken trust, potentially damaging relationships further.

Instead, focusing on direct communication, seeking wise counsel, and ultimately placing our trust in a Higher Power are far more beneficial and enduring solutions for navigating complex human dilemmas.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Liedetectortest.org: A Closer Look at Their Polygraph Services

Based on looking at the website, Liedetectortest.org presents itself as a professional polygraph service provider, deeply rooted in the U.K.

It claims to offer a range of lie detector tests for various sensitive situations, from relationship issues to business disputes.

While the site highlights affiliations with polygraph associations and mentions experienced examiners, it’s essential to understand the inherent limitations and ethical considerations surrounding such services.

The core premise of a lie detector test, or polygraph, involves measuring physiological responses like heart rate, breathing, and sweat gland activity to questions, with the assumption that deceptive answers will trigger noticeable changes.

However, these responses can also be influenced by anxiety, stress, or other emotional states, making the interpretation complex and potentially unreliable. Dronedrop-off.co.uk Reviews

Understanding the Polygraph Process

The website outlines a typical polygraph process, which generally includes:

• Pre-test Interview: An initial consultation to discuss the case details and formulate relevant questions.
• Data Collection: The actual test, where the individual is hooked up to sensors, and a series of questions are asked.
• Analysis and Report: The examiner interprets the physiological data to determine deceptive or truthful responses, followed by a written report.

The site emphasizes the importance of a controlled environment and experienced examiners.

However, even with the best protocols, the science behind polygraph testing is often debated, with many scientific bodies questioning its validity as a definitive truth-detection tool.

The American Psychological Association, for example, has noted that there’s little evidence that polygraph tests can accurately detect lies.

The Claimed Accuracy and Real-World Application

Liedetectortest.org references an accuracy rate of 95-98% from over 6000 tests conducted by the American Polygraph Association. Riverbendhome.com Reviews

While such statistics might seem compelling, it’s vital to critically assess what “accuracy” truly means in this context.

• Subjectivity in Interpretation: The interpretation of physiological data can still be subjective, relying heavily on the examiner’s skill and judgment.
• Countermeasures: Individuals can employ countermeasures e.g., controlled breathing, muscular tension to manipulate results, potentially leading to false negatives.
• Emotional Responses: Stress, fear, or even embarrassment can trigger physiological responses similar to deception, leading to false positives.

For instance, in legal contexts, polygraph results are generally inadmissible as evidence in U.S. federal courts due to their unreliability.

While they might be used as investigative tools or in specific plea bargains, their standalone value is highly limited.

In private matters, relying on such tests can introduce more doubt and division than resolution, especially if the results are contested or misinterpreted.

Liedetectortest.org: What You See and Don’t See

The website presents a clear image of professionalism and experience, highlighting the leadership of the Chairman of the U.K. Polygraph Association. Yallapremium.io Reviews

However, deeper into the nuances of their offerings reveals certain aspects that merit careful consideration.

Limited Scope of Services

While the website lists various services, such as:

• Infidelity Lie Detector Test
• Sexual Contact Lie Detector
• Partner Sex Offender Test
• False Accusation Lie Detector
• Addiction Lie Detector Test
• Historical Sexual Abuse
• Relationship Lie Detector Test
• Dispute Resolution
• Private and Business Theft
• Employee Fraud
• Family/Business Disputes

The core method remains the same: a polygraph test.

The application of this single method across such a wide array of complex human issues suggests a one-size-fits-all approach to multifaceted problems.

True resolution often requires more than just identifying “truth” through physiological responses. Lampadaeluz.pt Reviews

It demands empathy, open communication, and a willingness to understand and forgive.

The Human Element vs. Machine

The site emphasizes the expertise of its examiners and the use of “state-of-the-art Lafayette Instruments.” While technology plays a role, the human element in interpreting polygraph results is paramount.

This introduces a level of subjectivity and potential for human error.

• Examiner Bias: An examiner’s preconceived notions or biases, however subtle, could influence their interpretation of the data.
• Lack of Context: The machine measures physiological responses, not the underlying motivations, emotions, or complex circumstances that lead to a particular statement or action.
• The Weight of a “Result”: The “truth” or “deception” label given by a machine can carry immense weight, potentially leading to irreversible decisions or further damage to trust, even if the result is flawed.

A study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that while polygraph examiners might believe in the accuracy of their methods, independent research often presents a more cautious view, citing inconsistent results and the ease with which some individuals can manipulate the test.

The Inherent Disadvantages of Relying on Lie Detector Tests

While Liedetectortest.org might present its services as a definitive solution for uncovering truth, it’s crucial to acknowledge the significant disadvantages and potential negative outcomes associated with relying on polygraph tests. Fundedbits.com Reviews

These tools, rooted in a questionable scientific foundation, often create more problems than they solve, especially in delicate personal matters.

Potential for Misinterpretation and False Accusations

Despite claims of high accuracy, polygraph tests are not foolproof.

The physiological responses measured heart rate, breathing, sweat are indicators of arousal, not necessarily deception.

• Anxiety and Stress: A truthful person undergoing a polygraph test might experience significant anxiety, leading to physiological responses that an examiner could misinterpret as signs of deception. This can result in a false positive, wrongly accusing an innocent individual. Imagine the irreparable damage to a relationship if a spouse, despite being truthful, “fails” a polygraph due to overwhelming stress.
• Countermeasures: Conversely, a deceptive person might be able to control their physiological responses through various countermeasures e.g., mental arithmetic, controlled breathing, subtle muscle contractions, leading to a false negative. This means a guilty party could “pass” the test, reinforcing their deception and further eroding trust.
• Lack of Context: The test questions are often binary yes/no, failing to capture the nuances and complexities of human situations. A person might deny an accusation not because they are lying, but because their understanding of the situation differs, or because the question is poorly phrased. The polygraph cannot discern intent or context.

For instance, a 2003 report by the National Research Council stated that “no mechanism is known that would allow polygraph testing to work perfectly.” They also concluded that “polygraph evidence should not be admitted in court.” This highlights the significant risk of relying on such methods for definitive truth.

Erosion of Trust and Relationship Damage

Introducing a lie detector test into a relationship or dispute often signifies a profound breakdown of trust. Softwareacademy.co.uk Reviews

• The Ultimatum: Suggesting a polygraph can feel like an ultimatum, implying a lack of faith in the other person’s word. This act, in itself, can cause deep resentment and further fracture the relationship, regardless of the test outcome.
• Increased Suspicion: If one party “fails” the test, even due to anxiety or misinterpretation, the accusation is solidified, making reconciliation far more difficult. If they “pass,” the other party might still harbor doubts, believing the test was flawed or manipulated. The goal should be to rebuild trust, not to tear it down further.
• Focus on Blame, Not Resolution: Polygraphs are designed to identify “guilt” or “innocence,” shifting the focus from understanding, communication, and reconciliation to assigning blame. This can prevent parties from addressing the root causes of their issues and finding constructive solutions.

Rather than resorting to a machine to determine truth, genuine efforts should be made to foster open dialogue, listen with empathy, and seek sincere repentance and forgiveness.

These are the true building blocks of trust and healthy relationships.

Ethical and Principled Concerns

From a principled perspective, relying on a machine to discern truth raises several concerns.

• Reliance on External Validation: It places the burden of truth determination on a machine rather than on the individual’s conscience, integrity, and the strength of their testimony. It diminishes the value of honest communication and personal accountability.
• Invasion of Privacy: The process involves monitoring intimate physiological responses, which can be seen as an intrusive method of extracting information.
• Lack of Forgiveness and Reconciliation: When the goal is solely to catch a lie, there’s little room for compassion, understanding, or the path of repentance and forgiveness. Genuine resolution, especially in sensitive personal matters, often requires moving beyond blame and focusing on healing and rebuilding.

Ultimately, while the desire to uncover truth is understandable, the means by which we seek it matter.

Methods that introduce suspicion, erode trust, and rely on questionable scientific premises should be approached with extreme caution. Corpnet.com Reviews

Better Alternatives for Resolving Disputes and Building Trust

Given the inherent limitations and potential negative consequences of polygraph tests, seeking alternative, more constructive methods for resolving disputes and rebuilding trust is highly advisable.

These approaches prioritize open communication, understanding, and the pursuit of genuine reconciliation, rather than relying on a fallible machine.

Open and Honest Communication

This is the cornerstone of any healthy relationship and the most effective tool for resolving misunderstandings.

• Active Listening: Instead of focusing on what you want to say, truly listen to the other person’s perspective, feelings, and concerns without interruption. Seek to understand, not just to respond.
• Expressing Yourself Clearly: Communicate your own thoughts, feelings, and needs calmly and respectfully. Use “I” statements e.g., “I feel hurt when…” rather than accusatory “you” statements e.g., “You always…”.
• Creating a Safe Space: Choose a time and place free from distractions where both parties feel comfortable speaking openly and honestly without fear of judgment or retaliation.
• Patience and Persistence: Difficult conversations often require multiple attempts. Be patient with the process and persistent in your efforts to communicate and understand.

Data from conflict resolution studies consistently shows that effective communication, even in highly charged situations, leads to more sustainable and satisfying outcomes than adversarial approaches. For example, a study in the Journal of Conflict Resolution found that dialogue-based interventions significantly reduced conflict intensity and increased mutual understanding in various contexts.

Seeking Wise Counsel and Mediation

When direct communication proves difficult or insufficient, involving a neutral third party can be immensely beneficial. Stayinlisbon.pt Reviews

• Family or Community Elders: Approach respected and wise individuals within your family or community who are known for their fairness, wisdom, and ability to offer sound advice based on experience and principles. Their guidance can provide a much-needed objective perspective.
• Professional Mediators: Certified mediators are trained to facilitate difficult conversations, help parties identify underlying issues, and guide them toward mutually agreeable solutions. They do not take sides but focus on fostering understanding and common ground.
• Religious Scholars or Counselors: For individuals who share a faith, seeking guidance from knowledgeable religious scholars or counselors can provide a spiritual dimension to conflict resolution, emphasizing patience, forgiveness, and justice. They can offer advice rooted in principles that promote harmony and healing.

A 2018 report by the American Bar Association highlighted that mediation boasts an impressive success rate, with 70-80% of mediated disputes reaching a settlement. This far surpasses the win-loss paradigm of adversarial methods and fosters a sense of shared ownership in the resolution.

Focusing on Trust-Building Actions and Repentance

True reconciliation often involves more than just words.

It requires concrete actions and a sincere commitment to change.

• Demonstrating Reliability: Consistently following through on commitments, being punctual, and being transparent in actions helps rebuild trust over time.
• Sincere Apology and Repentance: If wrongdoing has occurred, a heartfelt apology that acknowledges the harm caused, expresses remorse, and demonstrates a commitment to not repeating the action is crucial. This isn’t just about saying “I’m sorry,” but genuinely understanding the impact of one’s actions.
• Forgiveness: For the wronged party, striving for forgiveness, even if difficult, can free them from the burden of resentment and pave the way for healing. This doesn’t mean condoning the action, but rather choosing to release the anger and hurt.
• Patience: Rebuilding trust is a marathon, not a sprint. It takes time, consistent effort, and mutual commitment from all parties involved.

Consider the data from relationship counseling.

A significant percentage of couples who engage in therapy report improved communication and relationship satisfaction. Bitskins.com Reviews

The National Survey of Family Growth NSFG data indicates that among married couples who sought counseling, a substantial portion reported it was helpful for their marriage.

This underscores the power of intentional effort and seeking guidance in resolving deep-seated issues, far beyond what any machine can offer.

Liedetectortest.org Pricing and Cost Considerations

Understanding the financial aspect of using a polygraph service like Liedetectortest.org is important, as these services are not inexpensive and represent a significant investment for a tool with debated efficacy.

Initial Deposit and Starting Prices

According to the website, all bookings require a £150 non-refundable deposit. This upfront cost secures the appointment but is not returned even if the test does not proceed or if you decide against it. The stated test prices start from £395 inclusive for tests conducted at their offices.

• Office vs. Home Testing: While the £395 covers office-based tests, the site explicitly states that conducting the test at your home incurs an “additional cost to cover travel costs.” This means the total price for a home visit will be higher than the base rate.
• Multiple Tests: The website also mentions discussing prices for “multiple tests,” implying that the cost can escalate significantly if more than one individual needs to be tested or if recurring tests are required e.g., for addiction monitoring.

A quick comparison of polygraph services across the U.K. Snapon.com Reviews

Often reveals prices ranging from £350 to £800+ depending on location, complexity, and examiner experience.

Liedetectortest.org’s pricing falls within this general range, but the additional charges for travel and multiple tests can quickly increase the overall expenditure.

Hidden or Variable Charges

While the site claims “No Hidden Charges” and “Confidential Report Included,” potential variable costs should be noted:

• Travel Costs: The “additional cost to cover travel costs” for home testing is not specified, leaving it open to variable interpretation based on distance and examiner availability.
• Test Complexity: Although not explicitly stated as an additional charge, more complex cases or those requiring extensive pre-test interviews or multiple question sets might implicitly lead to higher fees or longer session times.
• Follow-up Reports/Consultations: It’s unclear if any follow-up consultations or additional report copies incur extra charges.

Consider that for many, a few hundred pounds could be better spent on professional counseling, mediation, or other constructive means of dispute resolution that offer more tangible and sustainable outcomes for relationship healing. For example, a single therapy session in the U.K.

Can range from £40-£100, meaning multiple sessions of professional guidance could be accessed for the cost of one polygraph test. Cgbabyclub.co.uk Reviews

Cost vs. Benefit Analysis

When considering the cost of a lie detector test, it’s vital to perform a rigorous cost-benefit analysis, especially given the ethical and efficacy concerns.

• Financial Investment: The cost is a direct financial outlay for a service whose results are not universally accepted as definitive and can be challenged or misinterpreted.
• Emotional Investment: The emotional toll of undergoing or requesting such a test is immense. The stress, anxiety, and potential for further broken trust represent a significant non-financial cost.
• Opportunity Cost: The money and emotional energy spent on a polygraph test could be diverted to more beneficial alternatives, such as:
  • Marriage or family counseling: Investing in professional guidance to improve communication and resolve conflicts.
  • Mediation services: Engaging a neutral third party to facilitate productive discussions and reach mutually agreeable solutions.
  • Personal development courses: Investing in skills like emotional intelligence, communication, or conflict resolution.

Ultimately, while the desire to uncover truth is powerful, the financial and emotional costs of a polygraph test, coupled with its inherent limitations, suggest that these funds and efforts might be more effectively utilized in methods that promote genuine understanding, reconciliation, and healing.

How to Navigate and Potentially End Services with Liedetectortest.org

For those who have already engaged with Liedetectortest.org or are considering it, understanding the process for booking, potentially canceling a service, or dealing with the non-refundable deposit is crucial.

The website provides some direct contact information and hints at a booking process.

Understanding the Booking Process

The website offers multiple ways to initiate a service: Editions-heritage.com Reviews

• Free Consultation: They encourage a “no obligation free consultation” by phone 0203 9651755. This is likely the first step for most clients to discuss their case details and understand the suitability of a polygraph.
• Book Online: There’s an option to “Book Online for a lie detector.” This suggests a digital booking system, which would typically involve selecting a service, date, and time, and making the initial payment.
• Direct Phone Booking: You can also “Book your Lie Detector Test Direct” via phone.

The non-refundable £150 deposit is required upfront to secure a booking, which implies that once you commit and pay this deposit, it will not be returned even if you change your mind.

Cancelling a Liedetectortest.org Booking

Based on the explicit mention of a “non-refundable deposit,” it’s highly likely that if you decide to cancel a booking, the £150 deposit will not be returned.

• Deposit Policy: The website states: “All bookings require a £150 nonrefundable deposit.” This is a clear term of service.
• Full Payment: It’s unclear from the website whether the full test fee is required upfront or only the deposit. If the full fee is paid, the refund policy for the remaining balance upon cancellation would need to be clarified directly with them. Typically, professional service providers will have a cancellation policy that outlines what percentage of the fee is retained based on the notice period given.
• Notification: To cancel, you would need to contact them directly via phone 0203 9651755 or email [email protected]. It’s always best to have written communication email as a record of your cancellation request.

To avoid any financial loss, it’s prudent to be absolutely certain about proceeding with a polygraph test before paying any deposit.

A thorough consideration of alternatives and the potential negative outcomes should precede any financial commitment.

Alternatives to Cancellation: Re-evaluating Needs

Instead of outright cancellation, especially if you’ve already paid the deposit, you might explore if the service can be repurposed or if the funds can be partially applied to a consultation. Planet-ride.com Reviews

However, given the specific nature of their services, this is unlikely.

The most practical approach is to:

1. Contact them immediately: If you wish to cancel, do so as soon as possible via phone and follow up with an email for a written record.
2. Understand their specific cancellation policy: Ask about the policy for the full test fee if you’ve paid more than just the deposit.
3. Accept the non-refundable deposit: Be prepared that the £150 deposit will likely not be returned, as per their stated terms.

This situation further underscores the importance of thoughtful consideration and exploring more constructive alternatives before committing to a polygraph test.

Liedetectortest.org: A Muslim Perspective on Polygraph Testing

From a principled standpoint, the use of polygraph tests, such as those offered by Liedetectortest.org, raises significant concerns.

While the desire to ascertain truth is understandable, the method employed by lie detectors conflicts with several fundamental principles, advocating for approaches that foster genuine reconciliation, communication, and trust in a Divine plan rather than reliance on fallible human technology. Amotopart.com Reviews

The Problematic Nature of Polygraph Tests

Polygraph tests, despite claims of accuracy, are fundamentally flawed.

They rely on measuring physiological responses to questions, assuming that deception will cause measurable changes.

However, these responses can be triggered by a multitude of factors unrelated to lying.

• Doubt and Suspicion: Introducing a lie detector test into a personal or business dispute immediately signifies a profound breakdown of trust. It replaces the reliance on a person’s word and conscience with a machine’s interpretation, which is often inaccurate. This can cultivate an environment of pervasive doubt and suspicion, rather than promoting mutual understanding and belief in others’ good intentions.
• Lack of Definitive Truth: No machine can definitively determine truth. The results are interpretations of physiological data by a human examiner, subject to bias, error, and the complexities of human emotion. A truthful person might exhibit anxiety, leading to a “fail,” while a deceptive person might be able to control their responses, leading to a “pass.” This can result in grave injustice and irreparable damage to relationships.
• Erosion of Human Dignity: Forcing someone to undergo a polygraph can be seen as an invasive and degrading process, stripping individuals of their inherent dignity and their right to privacy, even when they are innocent. It places a machine above the human capacity for honesty, repentance, and sincere communication.

Consider that many judicial systems globally, including federal courts in the United States, view polygraph results as unreliable and generally inadmissible as evidence.

This legal skepticism mirrors principled concerns about the test’s ability to reveal absolute truth. Ecodrive.ae Reviews

Encouraged Alternatives for Resolving Disputes

Instead of resorting to polygraph tests, which can breed mistrust and false accusations, principled approaches emphasize methods that promote peace, reconciliation, and adherence to integrity.

• Direct and Sincere Communication: The most fundamental way to resolve disputes is through honest, open, and empathetic dialogue. Both parties should strive to listen attentively, express their concerns respectfully, and seek common ground. This fosters understanding and allows for the airing of grievances in a constructive manner.
• Mediation and Arbitration: When direct communication fails, engaging a neutral third party can be invaluable. This could be a respected community elder, a qualified mediator, or a religious scholar known for wisdom and fairness. Their role is to facilitate dialogue, help parties understand each other’s perspectives, and guide them towards a mutually agreeable solution. This approach is rooted in the pursuit of justice and reconciliation, rather than accusation and blame.
• Focus on Forgiveness and Repentance: If wrongdoing has occurred, the path to healing involves sincere repentance from the offending party and a willingness to forgive from the wronged party. This process, driven by spiritual principles, allows for the mending of relationships and the restoration of trust, far beyond what any technological tool can achieve.
• Seeking Divine Guidance: Ultimately, true peace and resolution come from placing trust in a Higher Power. Turning to supplication and seeking guidance in difficult situations can provide clarity, patience, and the strength to navigate challenges with grace and integrity. This fosters reliance on a source of ultimate truth and justice, rather than on fallible human inventions.

The emphasis should always be on preserving relationships, seeking truth through virtuous means, and fostering environments of mutual respect and trust.

Liedetectortest.org vs. Alternatives: A Comparative Look

When faced with the need to ascertain truth or resolve disputes, Liedetectortest.org offers a polygraph service.

However, it’s essential to compare this method against more ethically sound and practically effective alternatives.

This comparison highlights why principled approaches are often superior.

Liedetectortest.org Polygraph Services

• Mechanism: Measures physiological responses heart rate, breathing, skin conductivity to determine deception.
• Claimed Accuracy: 95-98% as stated by Liedetectortest.org, citing APA.
• Cost: Starts from £395, plus additional travel costs for home tests, with a non-refundable £150 deposit.
• Pros from their perspective:
  • Perceived Objectivity: Offers a seemingly scientific, objective method to determine truth.
  • Speed: Can provide results relatively quickly.
  • Deterrent: May act as a deterrent for potential deception.
• Cons Principled and Practical:
  • Questionable Scientific Validity: Not universally accepted as definitive evidence of truth due to high rates of false positives and negatives.
  • Erosion of Trust: Introduces suspicion and can further damage relationships, regardless of the outcome.
  • High Emotional Toll: Can cause significant stress and anxiety for participants.
  • Financial Cost: A significant investment for a tool with debatable efficacy.
  • Lack of Nuance: Fails to capture the complexities of human emotions, motivations, or misunderstandings.
  • No Path to Reconciliation: Focuses on blame rather than understanding, forgiveness, or healing.

Principled Alternatives e.g., Mediation, Counseling, Dialogue

• Mechanism: Facilitated communication, active listening, empathy, and seeking common ground.
• Effectiveness: Highly effective in fostering understanding, reconciliation, and sustainable solutions.
• Cost: Varies, but often provides more enduring value for the investment. Professional mediation/counseling typically ranges from £40-£150 per session, with many offering sliding scales based on income.
• Pros:
  • Focus on Understanding: Aims to uncover the root causes of conflict and misunderstanding.
  • Promotes Communication: Enhances dialogue skills and mutual respect.
  • Rebuilds Trust: Creates a pathway for reconciliation, forgiveness, and healing relationships.
  • Empowers Individuals: Gives parties agency in finding their own solutions.
  • Ethically Sound: Aligns with principles of justice, compassion, and human dignity.
  • Sustainable Outcomes: Resolutions are often more enduring because they are built on mutual understanding and agreement.
• Cons:
  • Requires Willingness: Success hinges on the willingness of both parties to engage honestly.
  • Time-Consuming: Can take multiple sessions and time for resolution.
  • Emotional Labor: Requires emotional effort and vulnerability from participants.

Comparative Data Points:

• Polygraph Accuracy: While proponents claim high accuracy, a 2003 report by the U.S. National Research Council concluded there is “no reliable polygraph test that can generally discriminate between liars and truth tellers.” This directly contradicts the 95-98% claim without strong, independent validation.
• Mediation Success Rates: The American Arbitration Association reports that over 85% of cases referred to mediation result in a settlement. This high success rate, combined with the focus on mutual agreement, makes mediation a far more robust solution for conflict resolution than polygraph tests.
• Relationship Counseling Effectiveness: Studies by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy AAMFT indicate that over 90% of clients report an improvement in their emotional health and that nearly 93% reported having more effective tools for dealing with problems after therapy. These outcomes focus on building skills and health, not just identifying a single truth.

In conclusion, while Liedetectortest.org offers a technological solution, the principled alternatives provide a more holistic, ethical, and ultimately more effective pathway to resolving disputes and building lasting trust, fostering healthy relationships and communities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Liedetectortest.org?

Liedetectortest.org is a U.K.-based service that provides polygraph lie detector tests for various personal and business situations, including infidelity suspicions, theft, false accusations, and addiction monitoring.

How does a lie detector test from Liedetectortest.org work?

Based on the website, a polygraph test from Liedetectortest.org involves measuring physiological responses like heart rate, blood pressure, respiration, and skin conductivity while a person answers a series of questions.

An examiner interprets these responses to infer truthfulness or deception.

How accurate are lie detector tests from Liedetectortest.org?

Liedetectortest.org claims an accuracy rate between 95-98%, citing data from the American Polygraph Association.

However, the scientific community widely debates the definitive accuracy and reliability of polygraph tests, with many experts stating they are not foolproof and can produce false positives or negatives.

Is a lie detector test legally admissible in U.K. courts?

Generally, polygraph test results are not admissible as evidence in U.K. criminal courts. They may, in very limited circumstances, be used in civil cases or for pre-employment screening in certain sensitive roles, but their legal standing as definitive proof is limited.

What types of services does Liedetectortest.org offer?

Liedetectortest.org offers services for infidelity, sexual contact tests, partner sex offender testing, false accusations, addiction, historical sexual abuse, relationship disputes, business disputes, private and business theft, and employee fraud.

What is the cost of a lie detector test from Liedetectortest.org?

According to the website, prices start from £395 for tests at their offices.

There is also a non-refundable £150 deposit required for all bookings. Home tests incur additional travel costs.

Is the £150 deposit for Liedetectortest.org refundable?

No, the website explicitly states that the £150 deposit required for all bookings is non-refundable.

Can I get a lie detector test done at my home with Liedetectortest.org?

Yes, Liedetectortest.org offers home testing services, subject to suitable conditions.

However, this option comes with an additional cost to cover travel expenses.

How do I book a lie detector test with Liedetectortest.org?

You can book a test through Liedetectortest.org by calling their phone number, using their online booking system, or requesting a free consultation.

What are the main concerns with using a lie detector test?

The main concerns include potential for misinterpretation, high rates of false positives or negatives, significant emotional stress for participants, the erosion of trust in relationships, and the questionable scientific validity of the method as a definitive truth-detector.

What are better alternatives to using a lie detector test?

Better alternatives for resolving disputes and building trust include open and honest communication, seeking wise counsel from elders or religious scholars, engaging professional mediators, and focusing on sincere repentance and forgiveness.

Does Liedetectortest.org offer free consultations?

Yes, Liedetectortest.org offers a “no obligation free consultation” that is confidential, allowing individuals to discuss their case with an experienced polygraph examiner before booking.

Where are Liedetectortest.org’s main office locations?

Liedetectortest.org has main offices in London Covent Garden, Birmingham, Cardiff, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, and Sheffield.

They also offer testing in various other locations across the U.K.

Who manages Liedetectortest.org’s services?

According to the website, all cases are managed by the Chairman of the U.K.

Polygraph Association UKPA, Mike Rumble, and his team of examiners.

What equipment does Liedetectortest.org use for polygraph tests?

Liedetectortest.org states they use “state-of-the-art Lafayette Instruments,” which are widely used in polygraph testing globally.

How quickly can I get a booking with Liedetectortest.org?

The website mentions “Same Day/Next Day Booking Availability” for private lie detector tests, suggesting a relatively quick turnaround for appointments.

Can polygraph results from Liedetectortest.org help rebuild trust?

While Liedetectortest.org suggests that truthfulness can help rebuild trust citing 70% of couples maintaining relationships after tests, relying on a machine can often further erode trust and cause more damage due to potential inaccuracies or the perception of mistrust inherent in demanding the test.

What happens if I fail a lie detector test from Liedetectortest.org but I am telling the truth?

If you are telling the truth but “fail” the test, it could be due to anxiety, stress, or misinterpretation of physiological responses.

This highlights the inherent flaw of polygraph tests and can lead to wrongful accusations and significant distress, even if you are innocent.

What are the working hours for Liedetectortest.org?

Liedetectortest.org operates by appointment only, with working hours Monday – Friday from 9:00 – 18:30, Saturday from 11:00 – 17:00, and Sunday from 11:00 – 16:30.

Is using a lie detector test a reliable way to solve relationship problems?

No, while a lie detector test might offer a quick answer, it is not a reliable or principled way to solve complex relationship problems.

It often fosters suspicion and can further damage trust.

More effective methods involve open communication, counseling, and genuine efforts towards understanding and reconciliation.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Liedetectortest.org Reviews Latest Discussions & Reviews: