Oxfordabstracts.com Reviews

Based on checking the website, Oxford Abstracts appears to be a specialized software solution designed to streamline the management of academic conferences.

It offers a comprehensive suite of tools, from handling abstract submissions and reviews to building event programs and facilitating attendee networking.

The platform emphasizes ease of use, robust features, and dedicated support, aiming to reduce the stress and complexity typically associated with organizing academic events.

For event organizers looking for a dedicated platform to manage the intricate details of scholarly gatherings, Oxford Abstracts presents itself as a compelling option.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Oxford Abstracts.com Review & First Look

Upon a thorough review of OxfordAbstracts.com, it’s clear the platform is purpose-built for academic event organizers, aiming to simplify complex processes.

The website highlights over 20 years of experience, serving over 100 countries, and boasts a 95% “Easy-to-Use” rating from Trustpilot.

This immediate impression suggests a mature and reliable service.

The interface itself appears clean and professionally designed, focusing on clarity and functionality rather than flashy aesthetics.

The navigation is intuitive, making it easy for potential users to find information on features, pricing, and support.

The site clearly outlines its offerings from submission management to full conference solutions, catering to different scales of events.

• Initial Impressions:

  • Specialized Niche: Clearly targets academic conference organizers.
  • Experience & Trust: Emphasizes 20+ years of experience and high user satisfaction.
  • Professional Design: Clean, functional, and easy to navigate website.
  • Transparent Offerings: Clearly categorizes services from basic abstract management to full conference solutions.

• Key Takeaways from First Look:

  • The platform seems geared towards reducing administrative burden, allowing organizers to focus on the academic content.
  • Customer testimonials are prominently displayed, lending credibility to their claims of user-friendliness and strong support.
  • The focus is entirely on event management software, with no diversions into unrelated services.

Oxford Abstracts.com Features

Oxford Abstracts offers a robust set of features designed to cover every stage of an academic conference, from the initial call for papers to the final presentation.

These features are segmented to cater to different needs, from basic abstract handling to full-fledged event management.

• Abstract Management Software:

  • Submission Forms: Highly customizable forms, allowing organizers to tailor requirements as needed, from straightforward to advanced. This flexibility is crucial for diverse academic fields.
  • Review Process: Tools to manage reviewer assignments including bulk assignments based on categories, track progress, and facilitate decision-making. Reviewers can auto-save their work, preventing data loss.
  • Integrated Ticketing Solutions: Streamlines the registration and payment process, a critical component often requiring separate systems.
  • Automated Communication: Schedule reminder emails to submitters and reviewers, reducing manual follow-up.
  • Instant Abstract Books: Generate fully formatted and designed abstract books in seconds, a significant time-saver for publication.

• Academic Conference Software All-Encompassing Solution:

  • Program Builder: An easy-to-use tool for creating the conference agenda, managing sessions, and speaker information.
  • Dynamic Networking Capabilities: Facilitates connections among attendees, which is vital for academic collaboration and knowledge exchange.
  • Interactive Poster Gallery: Supports virtual or hybrid poster sessions, allowing for broader participation and engagement.
  • Comprehensive Exhibitor Options: Provides tools for managing exhibitors, sponsorships, and virtual booths.
  • Live Conference Site: A dedicated online platform for the event, centralizing information and activities.
  • On-Demand & Live Content: Supports various presentation formats, accommodating both real-time interactions and post-event access.

• Hidden Gems Smaller, Unique Features:

  • Change Title Case: A simple but effective tool to effortlessly format text to title case, ensuring consistency across submissions.
  • Bookmark Sessions: Attendees can create personalized itineraries, enhancing their conference experience.
  • Detailed Reports: Provides insights into submissions, reviews, and attendance data, essential for post-event analysis.
  • Certificates & Symposium Options: Available as optional add-ons, offering further customization for specific event needs.
  • Multi-Stage Submissions: Allows for complex submission workflows, suitable for multi-layered academic processes.

The breadth of features suggests that Oxford Abstracts aims to be a one-stop solution, minimizing the need for multiple disparate tools and potentially reducing compatibility issues.

Their focus on automation and customization directly addresses common pain points in conference organization.

Oxford Abstracts.com Pros & Cons

Like any specialized software, Oxford Abstracts has its strengths and potential areas for consideration.

Weighing these can help organizers make an informed decision.

• Pros:

  • User-Friendly Interface: Repeatedly cited in testimonials and highlighted as a key selling point, indicating a low learning curve for new users. The 95% “Easy-to-Use” Trustpilot rating reinforces this.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set: Covers the entire spectrum of conference management, from abstract submission and peer review to program building, attendee networking, and virtual event hosting. This reduces the need for multiple, disconnected platforms.
  • Strong Customer Support: The website emphasizes dedicated support across all time zones, offering free video calls, video tutorials, and a comprehensive knowledge base. Testimonials frequently praise their responsiveness and helpfulness.
  • Customization and Flexibility: High degree of customization for submission forms, email templates, and program structures allows organizers to tailor the platform to unique event requirements.
  • Time-Saving Automation: Features like instant abstract book generation, automated reminder emails, and bulk reviewer assignments significantly reduce manual workload.
  • Transparent Pricing: Clear tiered pricing structure Basic, Abstract Management, Conference Plans with upfront costs, which is crucial for budget planning.
  • Positive User Testimonials: Numerous positive reviews from academic organizers underscore the platform’s effectiveness and reliability in real-world scenarios. For example, one user stated, “The platform is both flexible and user-friendly and their service is impeccable and very reasonably priced. Can’t recommend Oxford Abstracts highly enough.”
  • Long-Standing Experience: Over 20 years in the industry instills confidence in their stability and expertise in academic event management.

• Cons:

  • Niche Focus: While a strength for its target audience, its specialized nature means it might be overkill or less suitable for non-academic events or simpler gatherings that don’t require abstract management.
  • Pricing for Full Features: While transparent, the “Conference Plans” tier, which includes live conference sites and networking, is significantly more expensive than the basic abstract management tier, potentially posing a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets. The Basic plan, while free, has limitations less than 25 submissions.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features: While generally user-friendly, the sheer number of advanced features and customization options might still require some initial investment in learning, especially for first-time users of such comprehensive software.
  • Potential for Feature Overwhelm: For very small or less complex events, the extensive feature set of the “Conference Plans” might feel overwhelming or unnecessary, leading to underutilization of capabilities.
  • Reliance on a Single Vendor: Opting for an all-in-one solution means a higher reliance on Oxford Abstracts for the smooth functioning of the entire event. Any platform issues would have a significant impact.

Overall, the pros heavily outweigh the cons for its intended audience, making it a strong contender for academic conference organizers.

The main considerations revolve around budget and the scale/complexity of the event.

Oxford Abstracts.com Pricing

Understanding the cost structure of Oxford Abstracts is crucial for budgeting and planning an academic event.

The website offers a clear, tiered pricing model designed to cater to different scales and needs, emphasizing transparency and avoiding hidden fees.

Prices are quoted in GBP, USD, and EUR, indicating their international reach.

• Basic Plan:

  • Cost: Free
  • Target Audience: Small meetings with fewer than 25 submissions.
  • Features Included:
    • Unlimited submissions contradicts the “less than 25 submissions” in the description, suggesting the collection is unlimited but the management under this tier might be capped for functionality beyond basic submission collection, or it might refer to an overall event cap.
    • Collect, review, and decide on abstracts.
    • Event ticketing functionality.
    • Track reviewer progress.
    • Customizable forms.
    • Customizable emails.
  • Analysis: This tier is ideal for very small, initial events or pilot programs where basic abstract collection and management are sufficient. The “unlimited submissions” aspect might be misleading if the overall scope is capped at 25 for full functionality. It serves as an excellent entry point to test the platform’s core capabilities.

• Abstract Management Plan:

  • Cost: $830 / event USD
  • Target Audience: Events requiring comprehensive abstract management without the need for a full live conference site.
  • Features Included: All features from the Basic plan, plus:
    • Truly unlimited submissions likely the distinction from the “Basic” plan’s wording.
    • Fully customizable forms more advanced options than Basic.
    • Detailed reports for in-depth analysis.
    • Instant abstract books generation.
    • Ability to show reviews to submitters.
  • Optional Add-ons:
    • Certificates
    • Symposium
    • Multi-stage submissions
  • Analysis: This is positioned as the “most popular” plan, reflecting the core need for academic conferences: efficient abstract handling. The detailed reports and instant abstract books are significant value-adds, saving considerable time and effort. The add-ons provide flexibility for specific requirements.

• Conference Plans:

  • Cost: $2120 / event USD
  • Target Audience: In-person, hybrid, or virtual events that require a full, integrated conference solution beyond just abstract management.
  • Features Included: All features from the Abstract Management plan, plus:
    • Live conference site a dedicated online platform for the event.
    • Program builder for agenda creation.
    • Attendee networking capabilities.
    • On-demand & live content hosting.
    • Customizable colors for branding.
    • Interactive poster gallery.
    • “Much more” implying a suite of additional tools for full event execution.
  • Analysis: This is the premium tier, offering an all-in-one solution for complex events. The significant price jump reflects the inclusion of features that would otherwise require separate platforms e.g., event websites, virtual event platforms, networking tools. This plan is designed for organizers who want a seamless, integrated experience for attendees and comprehensive control over all event aspects.

• Key Pricing Considerations:

  • Per-Event Pricing: The pricing is per event, which is standard for conference software, but means recurrent costs for organizations holding multiple events annually.
  • Scalability: The tiered structure allows organizers to scale their investment based on the size and complexity of their event.
  • Value Proposition: The higher tiers offer significant value by consolidating multiple services into one platform, potentially reducing the hassle of managing disparate vendors.
  • “No Surprises, Just Transparency”: Oxford Abstracts emphasizes upfront cost clarity, which is highly appreciated by organizers working with fixed budgets.

Overall, Oxford Abstracts provides a straightforward pricing model, allowing organizers to clearly assess the costs based on their event’s needs.

The free basic plan is a good starting point for evaluation, while the paid tiers offer progressively more comprehensive solutions.

Oxford Abstracts.com Alternatives

While Oxford Abstracts offers a robust solution for academic conference management, a responsible organizer always explores alternatives to ensure the best fit for their specific needs and budget.

The market for conference management software is competitive, with various platforms offering different strengths.

• Leading Competitors & Their Approaches:

  1. OpenConf:

     • Focus: Purely abstract and paper submission management.
     • Pros: Often praised for its simplicity and affordability, especially for basic submission needs. It’s a no-frills option.
     • Cons: Lacks the extensive features of Oxford Abstracts for full conference management e.g., live site, networking, ticketing. It’s more of a component solution.
     • Best For: Smaller conferences, workshops, or academic journals that primarily need efficient submission and review workflows.

  2. EasyChair:

     • Focus: Widely used in computer science and engineering communities for paper submission, review, and publication.
     • Pros: Highly experienced in managing large volumes of submissions, robust review functionalities, and a strong user base within specific academic fields. Offers complex workflow customization.
     • Cons: Can be perceived as having a steeper learning curve and a less modern interface compared to newer platforms. Its broader conference management features are less developed than Oxford Abstracts.
     • Best For: Large-scale technical conferences with highly structured review processes and a need for powerful peer-review management.

  3. ConfTool:

     • Focus: Comprehensive conference management, including submission, review, registration, program planning, and even invoicing.
     • Pros: Very comprehensive, offers a wide range of modules, and is highly customizable. Can handle diverse event types.
     • Cons: The extensive features can lead to a more complex setup and a steeper learning curve. Pricing can become substantial depending on the modules used.
     • Best For: Organizations seeking an all-in-one solution with high flexibility and a willingness to invest time in configuration.

  4. Whova:

     • Focus: Primarily an event app and virtual event platform, with features for attendee engagement, networking, and content delivery.
     • Pros: Excellent for attendee experience, networking, virtual components, and real-time interaction. Strong mobile app.
     • Cons: While it integrates with submission systems, its core strength isn’t abstract management or peer review. it’s more about the “front-end” attendee experience.
     • Best For: Events prioritizing attendee engagement, virtual/hybrid formats, and robust networking, often used in conjunction with a separate abstract management system.

  5. Eventbrite/Bizzabo/Cvent General Event Management Platforms:

     • Focus: Broader event management, often with strong registration, marketing, and general logistics capabilities.
     • Pros: Widely recognized, excellent for ticketing, marketing, and general event logistics. Some offer virtual event features.
     • Cons: Typically lack the specialized abstract submission and rigorous peer-review workflows essential for academic conferences. Customization for academic needs can be limited or require extensive workarounds.
     • Best For: Non-academic conferences, workshops, or events where abstract management is minimal or handled separately.

• Considerations When Choosing an Alternative:

  • Specific Needs: Is abstract management your primary concern, or do you need a full-fledged conference solution?
  • Budget: Free, per-submission, or per-event pricing models vary significantly.
  • Ease of Use vs. Customization: Do you prioritize a quick setup or deep customization?
  • Support: What level of customer support is critical for your team?
  • Integration: How well does the platform integrate with other tools you use e.g., CRM, email marketing?
  • Virtual/Hybrid Capabilities: Is robust support for online components essential for your event?

While Oxford Abstracts stands out for its balanced approach to comprehensive features and user-friendliness specifically for academic events, exploring these alternatives allows organizers to make a choice that aligns perfectly with their operational needs and financial constraints.

How to Cancel Oxford Abstracts.com Subscription

For organizers who have used Oxford Abstracts and no longer require their services, or who are considering a different solution, understanding the cancellation process is straightforward.

While the website itself doesn’t feature a prominent “Cancel Subscription” button, the approach is typical for B2B software services.

• Direct Communication with Support: The most common and effective method for canceling any Oxford Abstracts subscription including paid plans or transitioning from a free trial to no service is to contact their support team directly.

  • Email: Look for a dedicated support email address, often found in the “Contact Us” section or your account dashboard. A clear, concise email stating your intention to cancel and providing your account details e.g., organization name, event ID is usually sufficient.
  • Phone: If a support phone number is provided, this can be an immediate way to confirm cancellation and discuss any final steps.
  • Support Portal/Helpdesk: Many software companies use a support ticketing system or a dedicated helpdesk. Log into your account and submit a support ticket indicating your desire to cancel.

• Key Information to Include in Your Cancellation Request:

  • Your full name and organization name.
  • The email address associated with your Oxford Abstracts account.
  • The specific event ID or subscription plan you wish to cancel.
  • A brief reason for cancellation optional, but can be helpful feedback for them.
  • A request for confirmation of cancellation.

• Important Considerations Before Cancelling:

  • Data Export: Before canceling, ensure you have exported all necessary data from your event. This includes abstract submissions, reviewer comments, decisions, attendee lists, and any generated reports or abstract books. Oxford Abstracts likely provides tools for data export, but confirm this with support.
  • Billing Cycle: Understand your current billing cycle to avoid unwanted charges. If you’re on an annual plan, canceling mid-cycle usually means you’ll be charged for the remainder of the period, or you might not receive a pro-rata refund. Clarify their refund policy.
  • Event Archiving: Inquire about their data retention policy. Will your event data be archived or permanently deleted after cancellation? This is crucial for historical records or future reference.
  • Notice Period: Some B2B contracts might have a notice period for cancellation. Review any terms of service or contract agreements you signed.

In essence, cancelling your Oxford Abstracts subscription is a direct process involving communication with their customer support.

They are known for their responsiveness, so expect clear guidance once you reach out.

How to Cancel Oxford Abstracts.com Free Trial

Oxford Abstracts offers a “Basic” plan that is free, which effectively functions as a free trial for basic functionalities and a gateway to their paid services.

Since it’s a “free” plan rather than a temporary trial that expires, the concept of “canceling” a free trial is slightly different.

• Understanding the “Free Trial” Basic Plan:

  • The “Basic” plan is perpetually free, designed for small meetings with fewer than 25 submissions.
  • It grants access to core features like submission collection, review, decision-making, and basic ticketing.
  • You don’t typically “cancel” a free trial that doesn’t have an expiration date or an automatic conversion to a paid plan.

• Steps to Effectively “Cancel” Your Free Account/Trial:

  • Data Deletion/Account Deactivation: If you no longer wish to use Oxford Abstracts at all, even for the free plan, and want your data removed or your account deactivated, you will need to contact their customer support directly.
    • Purpose: Explain that you no longer require the service and would like your account and associated data to be removed or deactivated.
    • Method: Send an email to their support team look for contact details on their website or in your account dashboard or submit a support ticket.
    • Information to Provide: Your account name, organization name, and the email address linked to your account.
    • Confirmation: Request a confirmation email once your account has been successfully deactivated or data deleted.

• No Automatic Charges:

  • Since the Basic plan is free, there’s no risk of automatic charges after a trial period. You will only be charged if you explicitly upgrade to a paid “Abstract Management” or “Conference Plans” tier.
  • Therefore, if you simply stop using the free Basic plan, you won’t incur any costs. However, your account and data will likely remain active on their system unless you request explicit deletion.

• Data Export Crucial Before Deactivation:

  • Even if you were only using the free tier, if you’ve collected any submissions or data that you might need in the future, ensure you export all relevant information before requesting account deactivation. The platform typically provides tools for downloading submissions, reviews, and reports.

In summary, “cancelling” a free trial with Oxford Abstracts involves proactively requesting account deactivation and data removal from their support team, as there are no automatic charges to stop.

Oxford Abstracts.com vs. Competitors

When evaluating Oxford Abstracts against its competitors, it’s essential to look at how it positions itself in the market, its unique selling points, and where it might differ from other prominent players.

• Oxford Abstracts vs. OpenConf:

  • Oxford Abstracts: Offers a much more comprehensive suite beyond just abstract management, including a live conference site, networking, and detailed reporting. It aims to be an all-in-one solution.
  • OpenConf: Highly focused on streamlined abstract and paper submission/review. It’s often simpler and more affordable for basic needs but lacks the broader event management functionalities.
  • Verdict: Oxford Abstracts is better for organizers seeking a complete solution for their academic event, while OpenConf suits those who only need efficient abstract handling.

• Oxford Abstracts vs. EasyChair:

  • Oxford Abstracts: Generally perceived as more user-friendly with a modern interface. Strong emphasis on broad academic conference needs, including virtual/hybrid components.
  • EasyChair: A veteran in the field, particularly strong in computer science, known for its robust peer-review functionalities and ability to handle massive submission volumes. Its interface can be less intuitive for newcomers.
  • Verdict: Oxford Abstracts wins on user experience and broader event features. EasyChair dominates in highly specialized, complex peer-review workflows, especially for large technical conferences.

• Oxford Abstracts vs. ConfTool:

  • Oxford Abstracts: Strikes a balance between comprehensive features and user-friendliness, with a clear tiered pricing structure.
  • ConfTool: Extremely comprehensive and customizable, offering a vast array of modules. This flexibility often comes with a steeper learning curve and potentially higher costs for extensive features.
  • Verdict: Oxford Abstracts is a strong contender for those wanting a rich feature set without overwhelming complexity. ConfTool is for organizations needing unparalleled customization and who are willing to invest time in setup.

• Oxford Abstracts vs. Whova:

  • Oxford Abstracts: Focuses heavily on the core academic event workflow, from submissions to program building, with attendee engagement as a supporting feature.
  • Whova: Primarily an attendee-facing platform for engagement, networking, and virtual event delivery. While it can integrate with submission systems, it doesn’t handle the core abstract management process itself.
  • Verdict: These are often complementary rather than direct competitors. Oxford Abstracts for backend organization and core academic content management. Whova for enhancing the attendee experience, especially for virtual/hybrid events.

• Oxford Abstracts vs. General Event Management Platforms e.g., Eventbrite, Bizzabo, Cvent:

  • Oxford Abstracts: Designed specifically for academic conferences, with specialized workflows for abstract submission, peer review, and academic program building.
  • General Platforms: Excellent for broad event logistics, marketing, ticketing, and general attendee management. They often lack the deep, specialized functionalities required for academic abstract handling and rigorous peer review.
  • Verdict: For academic conferences, Oxford Abstracts is generally superior due to its specialized features. General platforms might suffice for workshops or simpler academic gatherings without complex abstract processes.

• Oxford Abstracts’ Competitive Edge:

  • Academic Specialization: Its core strength lies in its deep understanding and tailored solutions for the unique needs of academic conferences.
  • Balanced Approach: It offers a comprehensive, all-in-one solution without sacrificing user-friendliness, a sweet spot many competitors struggle to achieve.
  • Strong Support: Consistent positive feedback on their customer service and responsiveness.
  • Transparent Pricing: Clear, upfront costs help organizers budget effectively.

In conclusion, Oxford Abstracts carves out a strong position in the academic conference management market by offering a comprehensive, user-friendly, and specialized platform.

While alternatives exist for various specific needs, Oxford Abstracts stands out for its integrated approach and focus on the academic event lifecycle.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Oxford Abstracts.com?

Oxford Abstracts.com is a specialized software platform designed to help academic event organizers manage conferences, workshops, and symposiums, offering tools for abstract submission, peer review, program building, and virtual/hybrid event hosting.

Is Oxford Abstracts.com easy to use?

Yes, based on user testimonials and their own claims, Oxford Abstracts.com is highlighted for its ease of use, with 95% of Trustpilot reviewers finding it “Easy-to-Use.”

What types of events can Oxford Abstracts.com support?

Oxford Abstracts.com is primarily designed for academic conferences, but its flexible tools can support various scholarly events, including workshops, symposiums, and poster sessions, whether in-person, hybrid, or virtual.

Does Oxford Abstracts.com handle abstract submissions?

Yes, abstract submission management is a core feature of Oxford Abstracts.com, allowing organizers to create customizable forms, collect submissions, and manage the entire review process.

Can I manage peer reviews with Oxford Abstracts.com?

Absolutely, Oxford Abstracts.com provides robust tools for managing peer reviews, including reviewer assignment bulk or individual, tracking progress, and facilitating decision-making. Curiouspencil.co.uk Reviews

Does Oxford Abstracts.com offer event ticketing?

Yes, integrated event ticketing solutions are available within Oxford Abstracts.com, streamlining the registration and payment process for attendees.

Can I build a conference program with Oxford Abstracts.com?

Yes, the Academic Conference Software tier includes an easy-to-use program builder that allows organizers to create and manage the conference agenda, sessions, and speaker details.

Does Oxford Abstracts.com support virtual or hybrid events?

Yes, the “Conference Plans” tier offers features specifically for virtual and hybrid events, including a live conference site, on-demand content, and an interactive poster gallery.

Is there a free version of Oxford Abstracts.com?

Yes, Oxford Abstracts.com offers a “Basic” plan that is free to use for small meetings with fewer than 25 submissions, providing core abstract collection and review functionalities.

What are the pricing tiers for Oxford Abstracts.com?

Oxford Abstracts.com offers three main pricing tiers: “Basic” Free, “Abstract Management” $830/event, and “Conference Plans” $2120/event, with features increasing at each level. Rushbyhike.app.link Reviews

How do I contact Oxford Abstracts.com support?

Oxford Abstracts.com emphasizes strong customer support.

You can contact their team via email, video calls, or access their knowledge base and video tutorials, as indicated on their website.

Can I export my data from Oxford Abstracts.com?

Yes, it is strongly recommended to export all your data, including submissions, reviews, and reports, from Oxford Abstracts.com before canceling any subscription or requesting account deactivation.

Does Oxford Abstracts.com offer networking features for attendees?

Yes, the “Conference Plans” tier includes dynamic networking capabilities to help attendees connect and interact during the event.

Can Oxford Abstracts.com generate abstract books?

Yes, a key feature is the ability to instantly create fully formatted and designed abstract books in seconds, saving significant time. Gologi.nl Reviews

How does Oxford Abstracts.com compare to EasyChair?

Oxford Abstracts.com generally offers a more modern, user-friendly interface and comprehensive event management features beyond just abstract handling, while EasyChair is known for its robust and complex peer-review capabilities, especially popular in computer science.

What are the main benefits of using Oxford Abstracts.com?

The main benefits include comprehensive features for end-to-end conference management, user-friendliness, strong customer support, transparent pricing, and specialized tools for academic events.

Is Oxford Abstracts.com suitable for very large conferences?

Yes, with its “Conference Plans” tier and robust features for unlimited submissions, networking, and virtual event hosting, Oxford Abstracts.com is equipped to handle very large academic conferences.

Can I customize the appearance of my conference site on Oxford Abstracts.com?

Yes, the “Conference Plans” tier allows for custom colors, enabling organizers to brand their live conference site to match their event’s identity.

Does Oxford Abstracts.com provide reports on submissions and reviews?

Yes, the “Abstract Management” and “Conference Plans” tiers offer detailed reports, providing insights into submission data, reviewer progress, and other key metrics. Prince-evans.co.uk Reviews

What happens if I stop using the free “Basic” plan without formally canceling?

If you simply stop using the free “Basic” plan, you won’t be charged as there are no automatic conversions to paid plans.

However, your account and data will likely remain on their system unless you explicitly request account deactivation and data removal through their support team.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Oxfordabstracts.com Reviews Latest Discussions & Reviews: