Scrapmed.com Features: An Overview of Offered Services

Scrapmed.com presents a suite of services primarily aimed at enhancing online presence and perceived credibility.

Read more about scrapmed.com:
Scrapmed.com Review: A Deeper Dive into its Ethical Standing

It’s crucial to analyze these features not just for what they offer, but also for what they enable, especially concerning deceptive practices.

Buying and Selling Digital Properties

The core of Scrapmed.com’s marketplace revolves around the trade of established online entities.

• Variety of Listings: The site claims to offer a wide array of “properties” for sale, including YouTube channels, social media accounts, and potentially blogs or websites. This suggests a broad approach to digital asset brokerage.
  • Specific Examples: The homepage explicitly shows YouTube channels with subscriber counts (e.g., “233.000 SUBSCRIBERS”) available for purchase, indicating a focus on established, though potentially artificially inflated, accounts.
  • “Any Budgets” Promise: The phrase “you can find any type of youtube channel in any budgets” suggests a wide range of price points, catering to different buyers. This broad appeal can attract both individuals and businesses looking for quick gains.
  • User-Driven Marketplace: The “SELL” functionality indicates that users can list their own digital properties for sale, making it a two-sided marketplace. This raises questions about the vetting process for seller legitimacy and property origin.
  • “See All Properties” Link: A prominent link encourages users to explore the full catalog, guiding them directly into the marketplace which prominently features review packages.
  • Contact for Custom Needs: “if you can’t find channel which fits on you feel free to contact our team and we will do our best for you.” This implies a concierge service for specific acquisition requests, further customizing the deceptive offering.

Review and Engagement Packages

This is where the platform ventures into highly problematic territory, explicitly selling online reviews and social metrics.

• Google Business Reviews: The website lists specific packages for Google Business Reviews, such as “150 GOOGLE BUSINESS REVIEWPrice$350.00” and “10 GOOGLE BUSINESS REVIEWPrice$25.00.” This is a direct offering of fake testimonials.
  • Direct Price Points: The clear pricing for review packages makes it easy for users to quantify the cost of fabricating their online reputation.
  • Impact on Local SEO: Bought Google reviews are intended to manipulate local search rankings, giving an unfair advantage to businesses that do not genuinely earn their positive feedback.
  • Consumer Deception: These reviews are designed to mislead potential customers who rely on Google reviews to make informed decisions about local businesses. Data from BrightLocal shows 98% of consumers read online reviews for local businesses.
  • Violation of Google Policies: Google’s User Contributed Content Policy explicitly prohibits fake reviews, incentivized reviews, and reviews posted by non-customers, all of which are enabled by Scrapmed.com’s service.
• Booking.com Reviews: Similarly, the platform offers “100 BOOKING REVIEWPrice$90.00” and other packages for Booking.com, a major platform for travel accommodation.
  • Influence on Travel Decisions: Travelers heavily rely on Booking.com reviews to choose hotels, guesthouses, and other accommodations. Fabricated reviews can lead to poor travel experiences.
  • Platform Integrity: Selling reviews on platforms like Booking.com undermines the entire review system, making it difficult for users to trust genuine feedback.
  • Reputational Risk for Hotels: Hotels or property owners buying these reviews risk severe penalties from Booking.com, including removal from the platform, once detected.
• Trustpilot Reviews: “200 TRUSTPILOT REVIEWPrice$250.00” is listed, targeting businesses that use Trustpilot for customer feedback and reputation management.
  • Independent Review Platform: Trustpilot positions itself as an independent platform for genuine customer reviews. Its integrity is built on the authenticity of feedback.
  • Detection Mechanisms: Trustpilot employs sophisticated fraud detection systems to identify and remove fake reviews. Businesses engaged in buying reviews risk public exposure and removal of their profile.
  • Erosion of Trust: When consumers discover that a business has bought Trustpilot reviews, it can lead to a complete breakdown of trust, often more damaging than having no reviews at all.
  • Broader Impact: The proliferation of fake reviews across various platforms erodes consumer trust in online information generally, making it harder for legitimate businesses to stand out.

Supporting Services and Claims

Scrapmed.com also highlights several features designed to instill confidence in its user base, though these claims require scrutiny given the problematic nature of its core offerings.

• Property Guarantee: “All properties are vetted by our team. This way we can guarantee and certify that all sites, blogs and YouTube channels for sale at socew are real and their stakeholders are reliable.”
  • Vetting Scope: The scope of this “vetting” is unclear. Does it ensure the organic nature of the growth, or merely that the account exists? If they sell fake reviews, their definition of “real” is highly suspect.
  • “socew” Typo: The use of “socew” instead of “Scrapmed” raises a minor but noticeable red flag regarding attention to detail or potential brand confusion.
  • Reliability of Stakeholders: How the reliability of stakeholders is determined when the underlying transactions (e.g., buying reviews) are inherently unreliable is a critical unanswered question.
• Business Opportunity: “We believe that all properties for sale on findsoc represent a good business opportunity. Whether they are of low or high value, they are all excellent opportunities for growth.”
  • Misleading Framing: Framing potentially deceptive acquisitions as “business opportunities” can encourage users to bypass ethical considerations in pursuit of perceived quick gains.
  • “findsoc” Typo: Another typo (“findsoc”) points to potential carelessness in branding or content creation.
  • Definition of “Growth”: If “growth” is achieved through artificial means, it is not sustainable or genuinely valuable in the long run.
• Our Experts: “We have experts for all phases throughout the process of selling a property. It is only in this way can we ensure the best experience for our customers.”
  • Expertise in Deception?: Given the services offered, one might question what kind of “expertise” is being provided. Is it expertise in ethical digital marketing, or in navigating the gray areas of platform policies?
  • Customer Experience: While aiming for a “best experience” is noble, it should not come at the expense of ethical conduct or the integrity of the online ecosystem.
• Free Valuation: “Before we put a property on sale we do a free valuation. This assessment is made by the best experts in the market which allows you to reach a fair value for both parties.”
  • Valuation Criteria: What metrics are used for valuation? If artificial metrics (like bought subscribers or reviews) are factored into the “fair value,” then the valuation itself is inherently flawed and contributes to the deception.
  • Market Experts: The claim of “best experts in the market” is generic and unsubstantiated.
• Customer Relationship & Service: “Throughout the process, even after the sale, our team will be at your side. We do not want you to simply make a sale or a purchase, we want to create a enduring relationship with all our customers. Every Transaction goes through a real-time live chat.”
  • Customer Support Focus: This highlights a commitment to customer support, which is a positive operational aspect. However, good customer service does not legitimize ethically questionable business practices.
  • “Enduring Relationship”: The goal of an “enduring relationship” is ironic if the foundation of that relationship is built on engaging in deceptive activities.
• Easy Integration: “Our main value asset is the ease of integration. We’ve created high quality API documentation and SDKs that are fully self-explanatory and comprehensive. Every process you will go through should be fast and easy.”
  • Scalability of Deception: The availability of API documentation and SDKs suggests that the services can be integrated into other platforms or automated, potentially scaling up the deceptive practices.
  • Developer Accessibility: This feature targets developers or businesses looking to automate the purchase of online metrics, potentially leading to more widespread abuse.
  • Focus on Convenience: Prioritizing “fast and easy” processes over ethical considerations is a common characteristic of services that aim to bypass genuine effort.

In conclusion, Scrapmed.com’s features are designed to facilitate the acquisition and sale of online influence, including explicitly problematic services like the sale of reviews.

While some operational aspects like customer service and ease of integration are highlighted, they do not mitigate the severe ethical concerns arising from the deceptive nature of its core offerings. Scrapmed.com Review: A Deeper Dive into its Ethical Standing