Top limitations of selenium automation

When looking to streamline your software testing process, Selenium often comes up as a go-to tool.

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

However, like any powerful instrument, it has its particular set of limitations that can impact your automation strategy.

To navigate the complexities of Selenium automation, here are the detailed steps to understand and mitigate its top limitations:

1. Initial Assessment: Begin by acknowledging that while Selenium is open-source and widely adopted, it’s not a silver bullet. Its primary focus is web browser automation, meaning it has inherent boundaries.
2. Identify Core Limitations: Pinpoint specific areas where Selenium falls short. This typically includes:
   • Desktop Application Testing: Selenium cannot directly automate desktop applications. If your project involves a mix of web and desktop interfaces, you’ll need complementary tools.
   • Mobile Native/Hybrid App Testing: For native iOS/Android apps or hybrid apps that aren’t purely browser-based, Selenium is insufficient. Tools like Appium are designed for this purpose.
   • Performance Testing: While you can measure page load times with Selenium, it’s not built for large-scale, high-concurrency performance or load testing. Dedicated tools like JMeter or LoadRunner are better suited.
   • Reporting & Analytics: Selenium itself provides basic results pass/fail. Generating rich, detailed reports and analytics requires integration with external frameworks e.g., TestNG, JUnit, ExtentReports.
   • CAPTCHA/OTP Handling: Automating CAPTCHA or One-Time Password OTP verification is deliberately difficult with Selenium due to their design for human interaction. This often requires manual intervention or workarounds.
   • Image Testing: Selenium primarily interacts with the DOM. Image-based testing e.g., visual regressions, comparing pixel differences is beyond its scope and necessitates visual testing tools e.g., Applitools, Galen Framework.
   • Pop-up/Alert Handling Non-Browser Native: While it handles standard browser alerts, custom JavaScript-based pop-ups or modal dialogues can sometimes be tricky or require specific locator strategies.
3. Explore Complementary Tools: For each identified limitation, research and integrate tools that fill the gap. For instance, consider:
   • Appium: For mobile app automation Android, iOS.
   • SikuliX: For desktop automation based on image recognition.
   • JMeter/LoadRunner: For performance and load testing.
   • TestNG/JUnit + ExtentReports/Allure: For advanced reporting.
   • Applitools/Percy: For visual regression testing.
4. Adopt Best Practices: Implement robust coding practices, design patterns like Page Object Model, and maintainable test scripts to mitigate challenges arising from Selenium’s dynamic nature and dependency on browser updates.
5. Community & Documentation: Leverage the vast Selenium community and official documentation e.g., https://www.selenium.dev/documentation/ for troubleshooting, updates, and learning about new features or known issues.

By taking this structured approach, you can effectively understand and work around the inherent limitations of Selenium, ensuring a more robust and comprehensive automation strategy.

Limited Support for Desktop Application Automation

One of the most significant limitations of Selenium is its exclusive focus on web browser automation. This means that if your testing needs extend beyond web applications to include desktop-based software, Selenium alone will fall short. It simply doesn’t have the underlying architecture or drivers to interact with native desktop elements like menus, buttons, and windows of applications installed directly on an operating system Windows, macOS, Linux. This distinction is crucial for organizations with hybrid application portfolios.

Inability to Interact with Native OS Elements

Selenium’s core strength lies in its ability to parse the Document Object Model DOM of a web page and interact with HTML elements. It leverages browser-specific drivers like ChromeDriver for Chrome, GeckoDriver for Firefox, MSEdgeDriver for Edge to send commands to the browser. This architecture, however, does not extend to the operating system’s UI layer.

• No Direct API Access: Selenium lacks direct API access to the operating system’s user interface components. Unlike web elements that have HTML attributes and CSS selectors, desktop elements are controlled by OS-specific APIs e.g., Windows API, Apple Accessibility API.
• Focus on Browser DOM: The entire design of Selenium is centered around the browser’s rendering engine and the content within it. It operates at the application layer of a web browser, not at the operating system level.
• Example Scenario: Imagine you need to test a standalone Java application or a .NET desktop client. Selenium cannot launch these applications, click on their file menus, interact with native dialog boxes, or read text from their status bars. This fundamental architectural choice makes it unsuitable for any form of native desktop automation.
• Real-world Impact: According to a 2023 survey by Statista, while web applications dominate, a significant portion of enterprises still rely on desktop applications for internal operations and specialized tasks. For these enterprises, relying solely on Selenium would leave a large gap in their automation coverage.

Need for Complementary Tools for Desktop Automation

To overcome Selenium’s desktop application limitation, testers must integrate separate, specialized tools. This adds complexity to the test automation framework, requiring additional learning curves and maintenance efforts.

• WinAppDriver: For Windows desktop applications, Microsoft’s WinAppDriver is a popular choice. It’s built on top of the Appium framework and implements the WebDriver protocol, allowing testers to write scripts in various languages C#, Java, Python to interact with Windows UI elements.
  • Integration Challenge: While WinAppDriver uses the WebDriver protocol, it still requires a separate setup and runs alongside Selenium, not within it.
• SikuliX: An open-source tool that uses image recognition to automate anything seen on a computer screen. It can interact with desktop applications, web elements, and even virtual machines by matching visual patterns.
  • Maintenance Overhead: SikuliX tests can be fragile as they depend on pixel-perfect image matches, which can break with minor UI changes e.g., font size, color, screen resolution.
• AutoIt: A freeware scripting language designed for automating the Windows GUI and general scripting. It’s often used for simple tasks like interacting with Windows dialog boxes or file explorers that might pop up during a web application test.
  • Limited Scope: AutoIt is primarily Windows-centric and has a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with its scripting syntax.
• UFT One Unified Functional Testing: A commercial tool from Micro Focus formerly HP that supports web, desktop, and mobile automation. It’s a comprehensive solution but comes with a significant licensing cost.
• Cost and Complexity: Integrating these tools means managing multiple automation frameworks, potentially different programming languages, and separate reporting mechanisms. This increases the total cost of ownership TCO for the automation solution and requires a more specialized skill set within the QA team.
• Example: A common scenario involves a web application that downloads a file, and then a desktop application needs to open and process that file. Selenium can handle the web part, but a tool like WinAppDriver or SikuliX would be needed to automate the desktop application’s interaction with the downloaded file. This multi-tool approach requires careful orchestration and error handling across different technologies.

Inadequate Support for Mobile Native/Hybrid App Automation

While Selenium shines in browser automation, it’s inherently not designed for direct automation of mobile native or hybrid applications apps that combine web views with native components. This limitation stems from its core architecture, which is built to interact with web browsers and their DOM, not the underlying mobile operating system’s UI framework. For organizations testing mobile apps, relying solely on Selenium would lead to significant gaps.

Designed for Web Browser Automation, Not Mobile OS UI

Selenium’s foundation is built around the WebDriver API, an interface for interacting with web browsers. Mobile native apps, on the other hand, are developed using platform-specific SDKs e.g., Android SDK, iOS SDK and frameworks e.g., SwiftUI, Jetpack Compose. They utilize native UI components e.g., UILabel on iOS, TextView on Android that are entirely different from HTML elements. Learn software development process

• No Direct Interaction with Mobile Elements: Selenium drivers communicate with browser engines. They have no mechanism to directly inspect, locate, or interact with elements like UITableView iOS list, RecyclerView Android list, or native camera APIs.
• Operating System Layer: Mobile applications run directly on the device’s operating system, leveraging its resources and UI rendering capabilities. Selenium operates at the application layer of a browser, not the operating system layer of a mobile device.
• Context Mismatch: Even if a mobile app contains a WebView component rendering web content, Selenium can only automate the content within that WebView. It cannot interact with the native controls surrounding it, such as navigation bars, tabs, or device hardware buttons.
• Hardware Interaction: Features like GPS, camera, push notifications, and device sensors are critical for many mobile apps. Selenium provides no inherent way to simulate or interact with these device-level functionalities. For instance, you can’t use Selenium to test if an app correctly uses the device’s camera to scan a QR code.
• Real-world Data: With global mobile app downloads consistently exceeding 200 billion annually data from Sensor Tower and Statista, 2023, the need for robust mobile app automation is paramount. This data underscores why relying solely on Selenium for a mobile-first strategy is a critical oversight.

Reliance on Appium as a Bridge

To automate mobile native or hybrid applications, the industry standard solution is Appium. Appium acts as a crucial “bridge,” utilizing the WebDriver protocol but extending it to mobile platforms. It effectively uses Selenium’s WebDriver API but translates the commands into platform-specific automation frameworks like XCUITest for iOS and UiAutomator2 for Android.

• Appium’s Role: Appium essentially reuses the WebDriver concept for mobile. It allows testers to write mobile tests using the same WebDriver API and programming languages they might use for Selenium Java, Python, C#, JavaScript, Ruby.
• How it Works: When an Appium client sends a command e.g., findElement, click, the Appium server receives it. It then translates this command into a native UI automation command e.g., driver.findElementBy.id"loginButton".click in Appium might become XCUIElement.tap on iOS or UiObject.click on Android via the underlying framework.
• Complexity Added: While Appium leverages the WebDriver syntax, it introduces its own set of complexities:
  • Setup and Configuration: Appium requires extensive setup, including Node.js, Android SDK for Android, Xcode for iOS, various Appium drivers, and emulators/simulators or real devices. This setup is significantly more involved than setting up Selenium for a web browser.
  • Element Locators: Mobile elements often require different locator strategies e.g., accessibilityId, className for native elements compared to web elements id, name, xpath, cssSelector. Testers need to understand and use mobile-specific inspection tools e.g., Appium Inspector, Android Studio Layout Inspector, Xcode UI Inspector.
  • Concurrency and Scaling: Running mobile tests at scale with Appium can be resource-intensive, requiring device farms or cloud solutions e.g., BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, AWS Device Farm, which adds to the infrastructure cost.
  • Performance Overhead: The translation layer between Appium and the native automation frameworks can sometimes introduce a slight performance overhead compared to purely native automation.
• Hybrid App Nuances: For hybrid apps that blend native components with WebViews, Appium offers the capability to switch between NATIVE_APP context and WEBVIEW context. This allows testers to automate both parts within a single test script, but it requires careful context switching and understanding of when to use which.
  • Example: A hybrid app might have a native header and footer, but the main content area is a WebView. Appium can interact with the native header buttons, then switch to the WebView context to interact with elements within the web content, and then switch back to native to click a native footer button.

The need to integrate Appium effectively means that while Selenium provides the conceptual framework WebDriver, it doesn’t directly solve mobile app automation.

Appium extends Selenium’s principles to a new domain, requiring specialized knowledge and setup beyond basic Selenium usage.

Difficulty with Dynamic Content and AJAX Calls

Modern web applications are highly dynamic, relying heavily on Asynchronous JavaScript and XML AJAX calls to fetch data, update UI elements without page refreshes, and create interactive user experiences. This dynamism, while great for users, poses significant challenges for Selenium automation, as it can lead to synchronization issues and make test scripts prone to failures if not handled meticulously.

Synchronization Issues and StaleElementReferenceException

One of the most common pitfalls when dealing with dynamic content in Selenium is synchronization. Selenium executes commands almost instantly, often faster than the web page can update its DOM after an AJAX call. This leads to situations where Selenium tries to interact with an element that hasn’t loaded yet, has disappeared, or has been re-rendered. What are the different types of software engineer roles

• Race Conditions: When a test script tries to find or interact with an element immediately after an AJAX call is triggered, there’s a race condition. If the element hasn’t fully loaded or become interactable, the script will fail.
• NoSuchElementException: This occurs when Selenium attempts to locate an element that isn’t present in the DOM at the time of the lookup. This is frequent after AJAX calls where elements might be added or removed.
• ElementNotInteractableException: Even if an element is present in the DOM, it might not be visible, enabled, or clickable yet e.g., it’s covered by a spinner, or its rendering is still in progress.
• StaleElementReferenceException: This is particularly tricky. It happens when an element is found and stored in a WebElement variable, but then the page’s DOM changes e.g., due to an AJAX update that re-renders the element. When Selenium tries to interact with the stale reference, it fails because the underlying element no longer exists in its original form.
  • Example: You find a “Submit” button, but an AJAX call triggered by another action reloads a section of the page, including the submit button. Your stored WebElement for the button is now “stale,” and trying to click it will throw this exception.
• Implicit Waits: While seemingly convenient driver.manage.timeouts.implicitlyWait10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, implicit waits apply globally to all findElement calls and only wait for an element to be present in the DOM. They don’t guarantee that the element is visible, enabled, or clickable, and they can slow down tests if an element is truly absent, as they wait for the full timeout.
• Hard-coded Delays Thread.sleep: New testers often resort to Thread.sleep to overcome synchronization issues. This is an anti-pattern as it makes tests brittle and inefficient.
  • Brittle: If the network is slow, Thread.sleep5000 might still not be enough. If the network is fast, the script waits unnecessarily, wasting time.
  • Inefficient: Leads to unnecessarily long test execution times, especially in large test suites.

Necessity of Explicit Waits and Fluent Waits

To effectively handle dynamic content and AJAX calls, Selenium testers must rely on explicit waits. These waits allow you to define specific conditions for an element to meet before proceeding with an action, providing much more robust synchronization.

• Explicit Waits WebDriverWait: This is the recommended approach. You tell Selenium to wait for a specific condition to be true before continuing.
  • WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWaitdriver, Duration.ofSeconds10.
  • WebElement element = wait.untilExpectedConditions.visibilityOfElementLocatedBy.id"dynamicContent".
  • Common ExpectedConditions:
    • elementToBeClickableBy locator
    • visibilityOfElementLocatedBy locator
    • presenceOfElementLocatedBy locator
    • invisibilityOfElementLocatedBy locator
    • textToBePresentInElementWebElement element, String text
• Fluent Waits FluentWait: A more advanced form of explicit wait that provides greater flexibility. It allows you to:
  • Define the maximum amount of time to wait.
  • Specify the polling interval how frequently to check the condition.
  • Ignore specific exceptions during the wait e.g., NoSuchElementException until the timeout.
  • Example:

    
    
    Wait<WebDriver> wait = new FluentWait<>driver
        .withTimeoutDuration.ofSeconds30
        .pollingEveryDuration.ofSeconds5
    
    
       .ignoringNoSuchElementException.class.
    
    
    WebElement foo = wait.untildriver -> driver.findElementBy.id"foo".
    

• Strategic Application: Applying explicit waits strategically is key. Not every element needs an explicit wait, but any element that appears or changes as a result of an asynchronous operation e.g., form submission, data loading, tab switching, pop-up appearance should be guarded by one.
• Page Object Model POM Integration: Integrating explicit waits within the Page Object Model POM is a best practice. Each page object can encapsulate the waiting logic for its elements, making the test code cleaner and more maintainable. For example, a method to click a button might include a wait for the button to be clickable before the click action.
• Increased Code Verbosity: The downside is that explicit waits add more lines of code to your test scripts, making them potentially more verbose than simple findElement calls. However, this verbosity is a worthwhile trade-off for test stability and reliability, especially in highly dynamic web applications.

Despite the powerful capabilities of explicit waits, consistently identifying and applying the correct wait condition for every dynamic scenario requires significant experience and careful analysis of the application’s behavior.

Failure to do so remains a leading cause of flaky and unreliable Selenium tests.

Limited Native Reporting and Analytics

While Selenium is excellent at automating browser interactions, its core functionality does not include comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities. Out-of-the-box, Selenium WebDriver simply tells you if a test passed or failed, typically through console output or basic assertion results. This limited feedback makes it difficult to understand the “why” behind a failure, track test suite health over time, or share meaningful insights with non-technical stakeholders.

Basic Pass/Fail Status Only

Selenium’s primary output is the execution status of its commands. If a command succeeds, it moves to the next. Regression testing

If it fails e.g., NoSuchElementException, TimeoutException, it throws an exception, marking the test as a failure.

• No Built-in Report Generation: Selenium itself doesn’t generate HTML reports, CSV summaries, or dashboards. It’s a low-level API for browser automation.
• Raw Output: When you run a Selenium test script, the typical output is a stream of logs in the console. For a small test, this might be manageable, but for a suite of hundreds or thousands of tests, it’s virtually useless for analysis.
• Lack of Context: A simple “Test Case X failed” doesn’t provide enough information. What was the exact error message? Which line of code failed? What was the state of the UI at the time of failure? What were the input parameters? Selenium doesn’t capture this context automatically.
• No Screenshots on Failure: By default, Selenium does not capture screenshots upon test failure. This is a crucial diagnostic aid that must be explicitly coded into the test framework.
• No Performance Metrics: Beyond basic page load time which you have to measure manually by starting and stopping a timer, Selenium doesn’t provide detailed performance metrics like network latency, resource loading times, or CPU usage during test execution. This highlights its limitation for actual performance testing.
• Example: If a test fails because a button wasn’t found, Selenium will throw a NoSuchElementException. Without additional framework logic, you won’t get a screenshot of the page at the time of failure, nor will you see the full browser console logs, which could reveal JavaScript errors preventing the button from loading.

Dependence on External Frameworks and Tools

To achieve meaningful test reporting, analysis, and visualization with Selenium, testers must integrate third-party test runners, reporting libraries, and build tools. This adds layers of complexity and maintenance overhead to the automation setup.

• Test Runners TestNG, JUnit: These are fundamental for structuring tests, managing test execution flow, and providing basic reporting hooks.
  • JUnit Java: Widely used for unit testing, but also serves as a test runner for Selenium. It provides @Before, @After, @Test annotations.
  • TestNG Java: More powerful than JUnit for functional testing, offering features like parallel execution, data providers, test dependencies, and more robust reporting listeners. It generates basic HTML reports and XML files.
  • Pytest Python: A popular framework for Python Selenium tests, offering extensive plugins for reporting, parallel execution, and fixture management.
• Reporting Libraries: These tools transform the raw test results into human-readable, interactive reports.
  • ExtentReports: A popular open-source with commercial options reporting library for Java. It generates rich, interactive HTML reports with dashboards, categories, screenshots, and step-by-step logs. It integrates seamlessly with TestNG/JUnit listeners.
  • Allure Report: Another excellent open-source reporting framework that provides highly detailed and visually appealing reports with execution trends, retries, step-by-step breakdowns, and attachments screenshots, logs, videos. It supports various languages and frameworks Java, Python, JavaScript, etc..
  • ReportPortal.io: An AI-powered test automation dashboard that aggregates results from various frameworks including Selenium, provides analytics, and integrates with CI/CD pipelines. It’s a more comprehensive solution for large-scale test reporting.
• Logging Libraries: Integrating logging frameworks like Log4j Java or Python’s logging module helps capture detailed execution logs, which are invaluable for debugging.
• Screenshot Capturing: Developers must explicitly write code to capture screenshots on test failure. This typically involves using TakesScreenshot interface in Selenium and then integrating it with the reporting listener.
• Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery CI/CD Tools: Integrating test results into CI/CD pipelines e.g., Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps is crucial for automated execution and visibility. These tools often have plugins to parse test results e.g., JUnit XML reports and display them in their dashboards.
• Maintenance Overhead: Each additional tool or framework adds to the complexity of the automation stack. Updates, configuration, and troubleshooting become more involved. For example, upgrading Selenium might require updating compatible versions of TestNG and ExtentReports.
• Skill Requirements: Testers need skills beyond just Selenium WebDriver scripting. They need to understand test frameworks, reporting libraries, logging, and CI/CD pipeline integration.
• Data Aggregation: For a large organization, aggregating test results from multiple projects and test suites some using Selenium, others perhaps API tests into a unified dashboard requires even more sophisticated tools or custom solutions.

In essence, while Selenium provides the automation engine, it leaves the entire “reporting and analysis” layer to the user, forcing a significant investment in building a robust surrounding framework.

This is a crucial consideration for teams aiming for professional-grade test automation insights.

Challenges with CAPTCHA and OTP Automation

One of the deliberate design hurdles in web automation, and thus a significant limitation for Selenium, is the handling of CAPTCHA Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart and OTP One-Time Password automation. These security measures are specifically engineered to distinguish between human users and automated bots, making them inherently difficult, and often impossible, for tools like Selenium to bypass. Importance of device farms

CAPTCHAs Designed to Prevent Automation

CAPTCHAs are security challenges that require a human to solve them, effectively blocking automated scripts.

They come in various forms, and their very purpose is to thwart tools like Selenium.

• Image-based CAPTCHAs: These ask users to identify objects e.g., “select all squares with traffic lights,” “identify all crosswalks”. Selenium, being a DOM interaction tool, cannot interpret images visually or understand their semantic content. It can’t “see” the image like a human can.
• Audio CAPTCHAs: For accessibility, some CAPTCHAs offer an audio challenge. Selenium has no audio processing capabilities to listen to and transcribe distorted speech.
• Text-based CAPTCHAs distorted text: These present distorted or overlapping text that humans can decipher but are hard for OCR Optical Character Recognition software to read accurately. While some advanced OCR libraries exist, integrating them is complex, often unreliable for highly distorted CAPTCHAs, and may violate terms of service of the target website.
• reCAPTCHA Google’s Advanced CAPTCHA:
  • reCAPTCHA v2 “I’m not a robot” checkbox: This version often analyzes user behavior mouse movements, browsing history, IP address rather than just a simple click. Selenium can click the checkbox, but the underlying behavioral analysis is beyond its control. If Google’s risk analysis flags the behavior as robotic, it will still present a challenge e.g., image selection.
  • reCAPTCHA v3 Invisible reCAPTCHA: This version runs entirely in the background, scoring user interactions without requiring direct interaction. Selenium cannot influence this scoring mechanism. If a low score is returned, the website might block the action or request further verification e.g., OTP, which Selenium cannot resolve.
• Ethical and Legal Implications: Attempting to bypass CAPTCHAs programmatically can be considered a violation of a website’s terms of service and, in some cases, may have legal ramifications, especially if done for malicious purposes. Automation should generally be limited to internal testing environments where CAPTCHAs are disabled.

Difficulty with OTP Verification

One-Time Passwords OTPs, often sent via SMS or email, are another security layer designed to verify a user’s identity through a secondary channel. Selenium’s limitation here is that it cannot directly interact with external communication channels like SMS gateways or email servers.

• External Communication Channels: Selenium’s scope is strictly within the web browser. It cannot:
  • Read SMS messages: It has no access to a mobile device’s SMS inbox.
  • Access Email Inboxes: It cannot log into an email client or an email server to fetch OTPs.
• Manual Intervention: In a typical testing scenario involving OTP, the most common workaround is manual intervention. A human tester receives the OTP and inputs it into the web application, pausing the automation flow. This defeats the purpose of full automation.
• Developer Backdoors Test Environments: For internal testing, the most secure and reliable approach is to implement a “backdoor” or “test hook” in the application for OTP generation.
  • Dev/QA Environment Feature: Developers can build a feature accessible only in test environments that either:
    • Logs the generated OTP to the application’s console or log file.
    • Provides an API endpoint to retrieve the latest OTP for a given user.
    • Disables OTP verification entirely for specific test users.
  • Integration with Test Scripts: Your Selenium script can then use an API call e.g., using HttpClient in Java or requests in Python to retrieve the OTP from this backdoor endpoint and then input it into the web application.
• Dedicated OTP/SMS/Email Testing Services Caution: Some third-party services claim to provide temporary phone numbers or email addresses to receive OTPs programmatically. However, using such services in a production environment is highly risky for security and data privacy. Furthermore, relying on external services adds external dependencies, potential costs, and security vulnerabilities to your test suite. It’s generally not recommended for sensitive applications.
• Ethical Testing: When performing automated security testing or penetration testing which is not what Selenium is primarily for, specialized tools and ethical hacking practices are used, and always with explicit permission from the system owner.

In conclusion, automating scenarios involving CAPTCHAs and OTPs with Selenium is either impossible by design for CAPTCHAs or requires significant external integrations and specific test environment configurations for OTPs. For production environments, these security measures are meant to be a barrier to automation, and attempting to bypass them without proper authorization can have serious consequences.

Limited Performance Testing Capabilities

While Selenium can give you a rough idea of how long certain actions take within a browser, it is not designed or suitable for comprehensive performance and load testing. Its primary purpose is functional UI automation, simulating single-user interactions. Attempting to use Selenium for large-scale performance testing will lead to inaccurate results, high resource consumption, and a significant maintenance burden. Introducing integrations with atlassians jira software and trello

Single-User Simulation Only

Selenium WebDriver primarily simulates a single user’s interaction with a web application through a real browser instance.

This fundamental characteristic makes it inadequate for performance testing scenarios that require simulating many concurrent users.

• Real Browser Instances: Each Selenium test execution requires launching a full browser instance Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Browsers are resource-intensive applications, consuming significant CPU, memory, and network resources.
• High Resource Consumption: Running even a moderate number of concurrent Selenium tests e.g., 50 concurrent users would require a substantial amount of hardware resources multiple powerful machines or a large cloud infrastructure. Scaling to hundreds or thousands of concurrent users becomes impractical and prohibitively expensive.
• Protocol Level vs. UI Level: Performance testing tools operate at the protocol level. They simulate HTTP/S requests and responses directly, without rendering the UI. This is much more efficient and allows them to generate thousands of virtual users from a single machine. Selenium, on the other hand, operates at the UI level, simulating user actions through the browser’s rendering engine.
• Focus on Client-Side Performance: While Selenium can technically measure client-side rendering times e.g., how long it takes for a page to become interactive, it doesn’t provide insights into server-side performance database queries, API response times under load, server CPU/memory usage.
• Variability in Results: Because Selenium uses real browsers, test execution times can be influenced by browser startup time, network latency, system processes, and rendering quirks. This variability makes it difficult to get consistent and reliable performance metrics under load.
• Limited Metrics: Selenium can only capture the time taken for specific actions e.g., driver.navigate.to"url". then System.currentTimeMillis - start_time.. It doesn’t provide detailed metrics like:
  • Requests per second RPS
  • Throughput
  • Latency under load
  • Error rates under load
  • Concurrent user capacity
  • Server-side resource utilization CPU, memory, disk I/O

Necessity of Specialized Performance Testing Tools

To conduct accurate and scalable performance, load, and stress testing, organizations must leverage dedicated performance testing tools. These tools are optimized for simulating large volumes of concurrent users and collecting comprehensive performance metrics.

• JMeter Apache JMeter: An open-source, Java-based load testing tool.
  • Protocol-Level Testing: JMeter simulates HTTP/S requests at the protocol level, allowing it to generate thousands of virtual users from a single machine.
  • Comprehensive Metrics: Provides detailed reports on response times, throughput, error rates, and server resource utilization.
  • Extensibility: Supports various protocols FTP, JDBC, SOAP/REST, etc. and offers powerful assertion and listener capabilities for detailed analysis.
  • Correlation and Parameterization: Essential for handling dynamic data e.g., session IDs, unique usernames in load tests.
• LoadRunner Micro Focus: A leading commercial performance testing solution.
  • Enterprise-Grade: Offers extensive protocol support, advanced scripting capabilities, and robust reporting for complex enterprise applications.
  • High Cost: Comes with a significant licensing fee, making it suitable for large organizations with substantial budgets.
• Gatling: An open-source load testing tool built on Scala, known for its high performance and developer-friendly DSL Domain Specific Language for scripting.
  • Code-centric: Scripts are written in Scala, appealing to developers.
  • Excellent Reporting: Generates visually rich HTML reports.
• Locust: An open-source, Python-based load testing tool that allows you to define user behavior in Python code.
  • Pythonic: Appeals to Python developers for scripting load tests.
  • Distributed Testing: Easily scalable for distributed load generation.
• K6: A modern, open-source load testing tool written in Go, with test scripts written in JavaScript.
  • Developer-centric: Focuses on being easy to integrate into CI/CD pipelines.
  • Performance: Known for its efficiency and low resource consumption.
• Integration with CI/CD: Dedicated performance tools are designed to integrate seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous performance monitoring.
• Cost Efficiency: While some commercial tools are expensive, open-source alternatives like JMeter, Gatling, and Locust offer powerful capabilities at no licensing cost, making them highly cost-effective for large-scale load generation compared to scaling Selenium.
• Expertise Required: Setting up and running sophisticated performance tests requires a different skill set than functional automation, including understanding network protocols, server architectures, and performance analysis techniques.

In essence, using Selenium for performance testing is akin to using a screwdriver to hammer a nail.

While it might partially work for very simple cases, it’s inefficient, inaccurate, and completely inappropriate for the intended purpose. Update google recaptcha

Dedicated tools are essential for meaningful and scalable performance insights.

Browser and Platform Compatibility Challenges

Selenium’s promise of cross-browser compatibility is one of its strongest selling points. However, achieving and maintaining this compatibility across various browsers, their versions, and different operating systems is a constant and often arduous challenge. The dynamic nature of web technologies and browser release cycles means that test scripts can become fragile and require frequent updates.

Dependency on Browser Drivers and Versions

Selenium WebDriver relies on separate browser-specific drivers e.g., ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver, MSEdgeDriver, SafariDriver. These drivers act as intermediaries, translating Selenium commands into actions that the respective browsers can understand. This dependency introduces several points of failure and maintenance overhead.

• Version Mismatch: The most common issue is a version mismatch between the browser, its corresponding driver, and the Selenium WebDriver library itself.
  • Example: If Chrome updates to version 120, you often need a specific version of ChromeDriver e.g., ChromeDriver 120.x.x to work with it. If you’re still using an older ChromeDriver e.g., 119.x.x, your tests will fail with a SessionNotCreatedException or similar error.
• Frequent Browser Releases: Modern browsers Chrome, Firefox, Edge have rapid release cycles, often updating every few weeks. This means your browser drivers need to be updated just as frequently, creating a continuous maintenance task.
• Driver Download and Management: Managing the correct driver for each browser and ensuring it’s accessible to your test scripts e.g., in the system’s PATH or explicitly set via System.setProperty adds configuration complexity.
• Browser-Specific Behaviors: Even with the correct driver, different browsers might render elements slightly differently, handle JavaScript events in subtle ways, or have unique security policies. This can lead to:
  • Flaky Tests: Tests that pass on one browser but fail intermittently on another.
  • Browser-Specific Locators: Sometimes, an element’s id or class might be consistent, but its visibility or interaction properties e.g., isDisplayed, isEnabled might vary, requiring browser-specific logic or locators in your tests.
  • Example: A pop-up that appears as a native browser alert in Firefox might be a custom JavaScript modal in Chrome, requiring different handling.
• Headless Mode Quirks: Running tests in headless mode without a visible browser UI can sometimes behave differently than headed mode, uncovering rendering or interaction issues that are specific to the headless environment.
• Security Updates: Browser security updates can also impact how Selenium interacts with a page, potentially breaking existing scripts.

Operating System and Environment Variances

Beyond browser versions, the underlying operating system OS and environment e.g., local machine, CI/CD server, Docker container also introduce compatibility challenges.

• OS-Specific Behaviors:
  • File Paths: How file paths are handled e.g., \ on Windows vs. / on Linux/macOS can cause issues if not abstracted.
  • Font Rendering: Fonts can render differently across OSes, affecting visual validation tests if not accounted for.
  • Driver Executables: You need the correct chromedriver.exe for Windows, chromedriver for Linux/macOS, etc.
• CI/CD Environment Setup: Setting up browsers and their respective drivers on a CI/CD server e.g., Jenkins agent, GitLab Runner can be complex, especially in a containerized environment Docker.
  • Missing Dependencies: CI servers often require additional libraries or display servers like xvfb for headless Chrome on Linux to run browser tests successfully.
  • Resource Constraints: CI environments might have limited CPU/memory, leading to slower or unstable test execution.
• Cloud Testing Platforms Mitigation: While cloud testing platforms e.g., BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, LambdaTest provide a solution by offering a vast array of pre-configured browsers and OS combinations, they come with:
  • Cost: These are commercial services with subscription fees.
  • Network Latency: Tests run on remote machines, potentially introducing network latency that affects execution times.
  • Debugging Challenges: Debugging a test that fails on a remote cloud machine can be more challenging than debugging locally.
• Browser Driver Management Tools: Tools like WebDriverManager for Java or selenium-manager built into recent Selenium versions help automate the process of downloading and managing browser drivers, mitigating some of the manual overhead. However, they don’t solve browser-specific behavioral differences.
• Matrix Testing: To ensure true cross-browser compatibility, testers must run their entire test suite across a “matrix” of browsers and OSes. This significantly increases test execution time and resource requirements. According to a 2022 report by Tricentis, over 60% of organizations struggle with effective cross-browser testing due to complexity and resource constraints.

No Built-in Visual Regression Testing

Selenium is designed to interact with the Document Object Model DOM and assert functional correctness e.g., a button is clickable, text is present. However, it has no inherent capability to detect visual changes or layout discrepancies. This means that a test might pass functionally e.g., a form submits successfully but fail visually e.g., the form elements are misaligned, images are broken, or the font is incorrect. This limitation is critical for ensuring a consistent and high-quality user experience. Geetest v4 support

Focus on DOM Interaction, Not Visual Rendering

Selenium’s core functionality revolves around finding elements in the HTML DOM and performing actions on them or querying their attributes. It primarily sees the structure and data of a web page, not its pixel-perfect appearance as rendered by the browser.

• Blind to Visual Defects:
  • Layout Issues: Misaligned elements, overlapping text, incorrect spacing, or responsive design breakpoints not working. Selenium won’t detect if a button is partially off-screen or if two text fields overlap.
  • Styling Discrepancies: Incorrect fonts, colors, border styles, or missing CSS that makes a page look broken. Selenium only sees the HTML, not the applied CSS rendering.
  • Broken Images/Icons: If an image fails to load, Selenium will still “find” the <img> tag in the DOM, but it won’t know that the image itself is broken or displaying an error placeholder.
  • Font Rendering Differences: Subtle differences in how fonts are rendered across browsers or operating systems.
  • Dynamic Content Shifting: If dynamic content pushes other elements unexpectedly, visually breaking the layout. Selenium will still perform its actions on the elements at their new broken positions, and the test will pass functionally.
• Functional vs. Visual Test Pass: A common scenario is a functional test passing because all expected elements are present and interactable, but the user interface is completely broken or unappealing. Selenium won’t flag this.
• No Pixel-Level Comparison: Selenium doesn’t capture screenshots by default for comparison, nor does it have algorithms to compare visual elements at a pixel level. It only interacts with the underlying HTML and JavaScript.

Need for Dedicated Visual Testing Tools

To address the lack of visual regression testing, testers must integrate specialized visual testing tools. These tools typically work by taking screenshots of the application under test and comparing them against baseline images, flagging any pixel-level differences.

• How Visual Testing Tools Work:
  1. Baseline Capture: On the first successful run or when a new feature is developed, the tool takes screenshots of the UI. These are saved as “baseline” images.
  2. Comparison: In subsequent test runs, the tool takes new screenshots and compares them pixel-by-pixel or using more advanced AI-driven algorithms with the baseline images.
  3. Difference Detection: Any significant differences are highlighted. The tool often provides a visual diff, showing exactly what changed.
  4. Human Review: A human reviewer then inspects the differences to determine if they are legitimate changes requiring a baseline update or actual defects requiring a code fix.
• Popular Visual Testing Tools:
  • Applitools Eyes: A leading commercial AI-powered visual testing platform. It uses “Visual AI” to intelligently identify meaningful UI changes, reducing false positives caused by minor, acceptable pixel variations. It integrates seamlessly with Selenium.
  • Percy BrowserStack: Another popular commercial visual testing tool that integrates with Selenium and CI/CD pipelines. It focuses on visual reviews and provides a robust platform for managing visual changes.
  • Galen Framework: An open-source tool that allows you to define layout specifications e.g., “element A should be below element B with 10px spacing” and then test against them using Selenium. It’s more about layout testing than pixel-perfect comparison.
  • backstopJS: An open-source JavaScript-based tool for visual regression testing that integrates with Puppeteer or Playwright not directly Selenium, but illustrates the concept.
  • Resemble.js / ImageMagick Custom Solutions: Teams can build custom solutions using image comparison libraries, but this requires significant development effort and expertise to handle various comparison complexities e.g., anti-aliasing, dynamic content.
• Integration Complexity: Integrating visual testing tools adds another layer to the test automation stack.
  • API Calls: You need to add specific API calls e.g., Eyes.open, Eyes.checkWindow, Eyes.close to your Selenium tests.
  • Test Environment: Visual testing can be sensitive to environments OS, browser, resolution, font rendering, requiring careful configuration to avoid flaky tests.
  • Maintenance: Baselines need to be updated whenever there’s an intentional UI change, which can be a manual effort and require careful management.
• Benefits: Despite the added complexity, visual regression testing is crucial for:
  • High-Quality UI: Ensuring the user interface remains consistent and visually appealing across releases and platforms.
  • Brand Consistency: Maintaining brand guidelines and design integrity.
  • Catching Subtle Bugs: Detecting issues that functional tests might miss, like broken CSS, missing icons, or layout shifts.
  • Faster Feedback: Quickly identifying visual regressions, often before they reach users.

While Selenium handles the functional aspects, visual regression testing tools are indispensable for comprehensive UI quality assurance.

Steep Learning Curve for Beginners

While Selenium is widely adopted and has a large community, it’s often perceived as having a steep learning curve, especially for individuals new to programming or test automation. Unlike some commercial or low-code/no-code tools, Selenium requires a solid understanding of programming concepts, web technologies, and software development principles to be used effectively.

Requires Programming Knowledge

Selenium WebDriver is an API Application Programming Interface, not a standalone application with a graphical user interface GUI for test creation. No_priority_access

This means all tests must be written in a programming language.

• Prerequisites: To effectively use Selenium, a beginner needs to be proficient in at least one of its supported languages:
  • Java: Often taught first due to its extensive enterprise use. Requires understanding of JVM, Maven/Gradle, OOP concepts.
  • Python: Gaining popularity for its readability and simplicity. Requires understanding of pip, virtual environments.
  • C#: Common in .NET environments. Requires understanding of .NET framework, NuGet.
  • JavaScript Node.js: Increasingly used for full-stack developers. Requires understanding of npm.
  • Ruby: Less common now but still supported.
• Object-Oriented Programming OOP Concepts: Best practices in Selenium automation like the Page Object Model heavily rely on OOP principles classes, objects, inheritance, encapsulation. Beginners without this background can struggle with structuring scalable and maintainable tests.
• Data Structures and Algorithms: Understanding how to manage test data e.g., lists, dictionaries/maps and implement logical flows loops, conditionals is fundamental for realistic test scenarios.
• Dependency Management: Beginners need to learn how to manage project dependencies using tools like Maven Java, Gradle Java/Kotlin, pip Python, or npm JavaScript. This involves correctly adding Selenium WebDriver libraries and browser drivers.
• Error Handling: Writing robust automation scripts requires proper exception handling try-catch blocks in Java/C#, try-except in Python to gracefully manage failures and provide informative error messages. Without this, tests are brittle and hard to debug.
• Debugging Skills: Identifying the root cause of test failures requires strong debugging skills, understanding stack traces, and using IDE debuggers.
• Example: A commercial record-and-playback tool might let a user create a test by simply clicking through a web application. In contrast, with Selenium, a beginner must write code to:
  • Instantiate a WebDriver WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver..
  • Navigate to a URL driver.get"https://example.com"..
  • Locate elements using various strategies driver.findElementBy.id"username"..
  • Perform actions usernameField.sendKeys"testUser"..
  • Add assertions Assert.assertEqualstitle, "Expected Title"..
  • Manage waits for dynamic content.

Understanding Web Technologies

Beyond general programming, effective Selenium usage demands a deep understanding of how web applications are built and behave.

• HTML HyperText Markup Language: Essential for understanding the structure of web pages and identifying elements. Testers need to know about tags, attributes, and element hierarchies.
• CSS Cascading Style Sheets: Crucial for writing effective CSS selectors for locating elements, which are often more robust than XPath. Understanding how styles are applied and impact element visibility.
• JavaScript: Modern web applications are heavily interactive due to JavaScript. Testers need to understand how JavaScript modifies the DOM, handles events, and makes AJAX calls. This knowledge is vital for diagnosing issues and implementing effective waits.
  • Example: If a button is disabled via JavaScript until certain conditions are met, Selenium might find the element, but element.isEnabled might return false. A beginner needs to understand why this happens.
• DOM Document Object Model: The DOM is the in-memory representation of an HTML document. Testers need to understand how elements are nested, how their properties can be accessed, and how dynamic updates affect the DOM tree.
• Browser Developer Tools: Proficiency with browser developer tools Inspect Element, Console, Network tab is indispensable for:
  • Identifying Locators: Easily finding IDs, class names, CSS selectors, and XPaths.
  • Debugging Issues: Checking console logs for JavaScript errors, inspecting network requests for AJAX failures, and understanding element states.
  • Understanding Page Structure: Visualizing the DOM and identifying dynamic changes.
• HTTP/S Basics: While not directly used in Selenium scripts, understanding how web requests and responses work e.g., status codes, headers can help diagnose network-related test failures.
• Learning Curve for Non-Developers: For individuals coming from a manual testing background or those without prior development experience, mastering these concepts alongside Selenium can be overwhelming and require significant time investment in training and practice. This often leads to a longer ramp-up time for automation teams.

In conclusion, Selenium is a powerful tool for those with a strong technical foundation.

However, its reliance on coding and deep web knowledge makes it a challenging entry point for beginners, requiring substantial investment in foundational skills before effective automation can begin.

Conclusion

The key takeaway is that Selenium is a powerful engine for a specific purpose: browser automation. It is not an all-encompassing solution. A wise approach involves: Audio captcha solver

• Strategic Tooling: Recognizing when to extend Selenium’s capabilities with specialized tools Appium for mobile, WinAppDriver for desktop, JMeter for performance, Applitools for visual testing, TestNG/ExtentReports for reporting.
• Robust Framework Design: Investing in well-structured frameworks like Page Object Model that incorporate explicit waits, comprehensive logging, and flexible configuration to counter the challenges of dynamic web content and cross-browser variations.
• Ethical Considerations: Always respecting website terms of service and recognizing that certain security measures like CAPTCHA/OTP are intentionally designed to prevent automation in production environments, requiring alternative strategies for testing.

Ultimately, by understanding these limitations and proactively addressing them through complementary tools, sound architectural design, and continuous learning, teams can harness Selenium’s strengths while effectively mitigating its weaknesses, leading to more robust, reliable, and maintainable automation suites.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main limitations of Selenium?

The main limitations of Selenium include its inability to automate desktop applications, lack of built-in support for mobile native/hybrid apps requiring Appium, challenges with dynamic content and synchronization, absence of comprehensive native reporting, inability to bypass CAPTCHA/OTP, unsuitability for performance testing, constant browser/platform compatibility issues, and a steep learning curve requiring programming knowledge.

Can Selenium automate desktop applications?

No, Selenium cannot directly automate desktop applications.

It is exclusively designed for web browser automation.

For desktop application testing, you need to integrate complementary tools like WinAppDriver for Windows, SikuliX image recognition, or AutoIt. Bypass lemin captcha

Is Selenium suitable for mobile app automation?

Selenium is not suitable for mobile native or hybrid app automation on its own.

It can only automate web content within a mobile browser or a WebView.

To automate native iOS/Android apps, you must use Appium, which leverages Selenium’s WebDriver protocol but extends it to mobile platforms.

Why does Selenium struggle with dynamic content?

Selenium struggles with dynamic content like that generated by AJAX calls because it executes commands very quickly, often before the web page’s DOM has fully updated.

This leads to synchronization issues, causing errors like NoSuchElementException or StaleElementReferenceException if not handled correctly with explicit waits. Google search recaptcha

Does Selenium provide detailed test reports?

No, Selenium itself does not provide detailed or comprehensive test reports. It only indicates basic pass/fail status.

To generate rich, interactive reports with screenshots, logs, and analytics, you need to integrate external test frameworks like TestNG or JUnit, along with reporting libraries such as ExtentReports or Allure Report.

Can Selenium automate CAPTCHAs?

No, Selenium cannot automate CAPTCHAs.

CAPTCHAs like reCAPTCHA or image-based challenges are specifically designed to distinguish between human users and automated bots, making them inherently difficult or impossible for automation tools like Selenium to bypass.

Attempting to do so may also violate a website’s terms of service. Data annotation

Is Selenium good for performance testing?

No, Selenium is not good for performance testing.

It simulates only a single user interacting with a real browser, which consumes significant resources.

It is inefficient and inaccurate for simulating thousands of concurrent users and collecting server-side performance metrics.

Dedicated performance testing tools like JMeter, LoadRunner, or Gatling are required for this purpose.

What are the browser compatibility challenges with Selenium?

Selenium faces browser compatibility challenges due to its dependency on specific browser drivers e.g., ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver which must match the browser version. Bounding box object detection

Frequent browser updates necessitate constant driver updates, and subtle differences in browser rendering or JavaScript execution can lead to flaky tests across different browsers and operating systems.

Is Selenium easy to learn for beginners?

Selenium has a steep learning curve for beginners, especially those without prior programming experience. It requires proficiency in a programming language Java, Python, C#, JavaScript, an understanding of OOP concepts, and a solid grasp of web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, as well as browser developer tools.

Can Selenium handle OTP One-Time Password automation?

Selenium cannot directly handle OTP One-Time Password automation because it cannot interact with external communication channels like SMS messages or email inboxes.

For testing scenarios involving OTP, developers typically implement “backdoors” or test hooks in the test environment to retrieve the OTP programmatically.

What is the alternative for mobile automation using Selenium?

The industry standard alternative for mobile automation that works with Selenium’s WebDriver protocol is Appium. Socks proxies quick start guide

Appium acts as a server that translates WebDriver commands into native mobile UI automation commands for iOS using XCUITest and Android using UiAutomator2/Espresso.

How to overcome synchronization issues in Selenium?

To overcome synchronization issues caused by dynamic content, use explicit waits WebDriverWait with ExpectedConditions or fluent waits FluentWait. These allow your script to wait for a specific condition e.g., element visibility, clickability to be met before proceeding, making your tests more stable and reliable. Avoid Thread.sleep.

Does Selenium support visual regression testing?

No, Selenium does not have built-in support for visual regression testing.

It only interacts with the DOM and cannot compare pixels or detect visual discrepancies.

To perform visual regression testing, you need to integrate specialized tools like Applitools Eyes or Percy, which capture screenshots and compare them against baselines. Mobile proxies quick start guide

What is the role of browser drivers in Selenium?

Browser drivers like ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver are essential intermediaries in Selenium.

They translate the high-level WebDriver commands from your test script into browser-specific commands that the actual browser can understand and execute. Each browser requires its own compatible driver.

Can Selenium execute tests in parallel?

Yes, Selenium itself doesn’t directly manage parallel execution, but it integrates seamlessly with test runners like TestNG in Java or Pytest in Python that support parallel test execution.

This allows you to run multiple tests simultaneously across different browsers or instances, reducing overall execution time.

Is Selenium free to use?

Yes, Selenium WebDriver is an open-source project and is completely free to use.

However, setting up a comprehensive automation framework around Selenium might involve costs for complementary tools e.g., commercial visual testing tools, cloud testing platforms or infrastructure.

What kind of errors can Selenium commonly throw?

Common errors thrown by Selenium include NoSuchElementException element not found, TimeoutException element not found within a specified wait time, StaleElementReferenceException element reference is no longer valid in the DOM, ElementNotInteractableException element found but not clickable/sendable, and WebDriverException general error with the WebDriver or browser.

How does the Page Object Model help mitigate Selenium limitations?

The Page Object Model POM is a design pattern that helps mitigate Selenium limitations by improving test readability, maintainability, and reusability.

It encapsulates page elements and their interactions within separate page classes, making tests easier to update when UI changes occur and promoting the use of robust explicit waits within page methods.

Can Selenium interact with system dialogs e.g., file upload/download?

Selenium can handle standard browser-native alerts JavaScript alert, confirm, prompt using driver.switchTo.alert. However, for operating system-level file upload/download dialogs e.g., Windows Explorer dialog, Selenium cannot directly interact.

You may need to use tools like AutoIt or SikuliX for such interactions, or leverage JavaScript sendkeys on the input element for file uploads if applicable.

What’s the biggest challenge for large-scale Selenium adoption?

For large-scale Selenium adoption, the biggest challenge is often maintenance overhead. This includes continuously updating browser drivers, adapting to browser-specific behaviors, managing complex synchronization logic for dynamic applications, integrating and maintaining numerous complementary tools for non-web automation/reporting, and handling the sheer volume of test data and results. Scaling effectively requires significant engineering effort and robust framework design.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Top limitations of Latest Discussions & Reviews: