Based on looking at the website, Unused-css.com positions itself as a specialized online service designed to help web developers and site owners identify and eliminate redundant CSS code from their websites.
This directly addresses a common web performance bottleneck, as the site claims that “on average, about 35% of CSS code is completely unnecessary.” By automating the process of finding and removing this ‘dead’ CSS, Unused-css.com aims to deliver tangible benefits such as faster website load times, improved user engagement, and more maintainable codebases.
The core promise revolves around optimizing web performance by streamlining the CSS, ultimately contributing to a better user experience and potentially higher conversion rates for businesses.
Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.
IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.
0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. |
Amazon.com:
Check Amazon for Unused-css.com Reviews Latest Discussions & Reviews: |
The Unused-css.com Promise: A Deep Dive into Core Features
Unused-css.com’s primary value proposition centers on its ability to meticulously find and remove unused CSS rules. This isn’t just a simple file cleaner.
The service seems to employ sophisticated methods to scan various elements of a website.
The impact of streamlined CSS is significant, not just in terms of raw file size but also in how a browser processes and renders a page.
Automatic Unused CSS Detection
The cornerstone of Unused-css.com is its automated detection system.
Instead of developers manually sifting through thousands of lines of code, the service takes on this tedious task. Firehydrant.com Reviews
- Comprehensive Scanning: The platform claims to scan HTML and JavaScript files to understand which CSS rules are actively being used. This is crucial because CSS can be dynamically applied or removed by JavaScript, making simple static analysis insufficient.
- Dynamic Content Consideration: Websites today are rarely static. With single-page applications SPAs and dynamic content loading, CSS usage can change based on user interactions. Unused-css.com’s approach of looking at JavaScript suggests it attempts to account for these dynamic aspects, a significant advantage over less advanced tools.
- Efficiency: Automating this process saves countless hours for developers, allowing them to focus on feature development rather than performance optimization minutiae.
Providing Clean CSS Files for Download
After identifying redundant code, the service doesn’t just point out the issues. it provides a direct solution.
- Actionable Output: Users receive clean CSS files, ready for implementation. This “plug-and-play” aspect minimizes the effort required from the user’s end.
- Reduced Error Potential: By providing a clean file, the risk of human error during manual code removal is significantly reduced. This ensures that essential CSS rules are not accidentally deleted.
- Version Control Integration: While not explicitly stated, the ability to download clean files implies easy integration with existing version control systems, allowing developers to track changes and revert if necessary.
Compatibility Across Platforms
A major selling point for any web optimization tool is its broad compatibility, and Unused-css.com highlights this.
- WordPress, Bootstrap, and Beyond: The website explicitly states compatibility with popular platforms like WordPress and frameworks like Bootstrap. This is vital as these represent a large portion of the web.
- Framework Agnostic: The underlying mechanism for identifying unused CSS scanning HTML and JavaScript suggests it should work with virtually any web technology, from custom-built sites to other CMS platforms.
- Broad Appeal: This wide compatibility makes the service attractive to a diverse range of users, from individual bloggers to large enterprises.
The Performance Upside: How Unused CSS Impacts Your Site
The true value of removing unused CSS lies in the tangible performance benefits it delivers.
Faster Website Load Times
This is perhaps the most immediate and impactful benefit.
The less data a browser has to download and process, the faster a page appears to the user. Botkeeper.com Reviews
- Reduced File Size: A smaller CSS file means fewer bytes transferred over the network. For mobile users or those on slower connections, this difference can be dramatic.
- Quicker Parsing and Rendering: Browsers must parse CSS rules to understand how to style a page. Unused rules still need to be parsed, even if they aren’t applied. By removing them, the browser has less work to do, leading to faster rendering times.
- Impact on Core Web Vitals: Google’s Core Web Vitals CWV, particularly Largest Contentful Paint LCP and First Input Delay FID, are heavily influenced by load times. Optimized CSS can directly improve these metrics, which in turn can positively affect search engine rankings. A study by Portent showed that a one-second delay in mobile load time can decrease conversion rates by up to 20%.
Stronger User Engagement
A fast website isn’t just about technical metrics. it’s about human psychology and user behavior.
- Reduced Bounce Rate: Users are notoriously impatient. If a site takes too long to load, they are likely to leave before engaging with the content. Google’s own research indicates that as page load time goes from 1s to 3s, the probability of bounce increases by 32%.
- Improved Conversions: For e-commerce sites, blogs, or any platform with a call to action, faster load times correlate with higher conversion rates. A seamless experience encourages users to complete desired actions, whether it’s making a purchase, signing up for a newsletter, or consuming more content.
- Enhanced User Experience UX: Beyond metrics, a fast site simply feels better to use. It reduces frustration and creates a perception of professionalism and efficiency.
More Maintainable Code
Beyond immediate performance, a clean codebase offers long-term advantages for development and upkeep.
- Reduced Cognitive Load: When developers look at a CSS file riddled with unused rules, it’s harder to understand the actual styling logic. Removing clutter simplifies the code, making it easier to read and comprehend.
- Easier Debugging: Pinpointing issues in a complex CSS file becomes significantly easier when only relevant rules are present. This reduces the time spent on debugging and troubleshooting.
- Faster Development Cycles: With a clearer understanding of the codebase and less extraneous code to navigate, developers can implement new features or make changes more quickly and with fewer errors. This contributes to agile development practices and faster time-to-market.
Advanced Features and Capabilities Noticed
Beyond the basic clean-up, Unused-css.com appears to offer several advanced functionalities that cater to more complex web development needs.
These features demonstrate a more robust approach to CSS optimization than a simple one-off scanner.
Scanning JavaScript Files for CSS Rules
This is a critical capability often overlooked by simpler CSS optimization tools. One-line.com Reviews
Many modern web applications dynamically apply or remove CSS classes and styles via JavaScript.
- Dynamic Styling: JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue often manipulate the DOM Document Object Model and apply CSS classes based on user interaction or application state. A tool that only scans static HTML will miss these dynamically used rules.
- Comprehensive Analysis: By scanning JavaScript, Unused-css.com aims to ensure that even CSS rules referenced in JavaScript are not mistakenly identified as “unused.” This prevents accidental removal of critical styling components that only become active under specific conditions.
- Accuracy: This feature significantly increases the accuracy of the unused CSS detection, reducing the likelihood of breaking layouts or functionalities after optimization.
Exploring Responsive Design Rules and Media Queries
Websites must adapt seamlessly across desktops, tablets, and mobile phones, which relies heavily on media queries.
- Device-Specific Styling: Media queries apply CSS rules based on screen size, resolution, orientation, and other device characteristics. A simple scanner might not differentiate between rules used on a desktop versus a mobile device.
- Complete Coverage: Unused-css.com’s attention to media queries suggests it analyzes how CSS is used across different breakpoints and environments, ensuring that rules essential for responsive behavior are preserved.
- Avoiding Layout Breaks: Incorrectly removing CSS within media queries could lead to broken layouts on specific devices. This feature helps prevent such critical errors.
Regularly Checking Your Website for Changes
Websites are rarely static. content, features, and even frameworks evolve.
A one-time CSS cleanup might become irrelevant as the site changes.
- Continuous Optimization: The ability to regularly check for changes implies a service that can provide ongoing optimization. This is particularly valuable for actively developed websites.
- Maintaining Performance: As new features or third-party scripts are added, they often bring their own CSS, some of which might be redundant. Regular checks ensure that the website’s performance doesn’t degrade over time due to accumulating unused CSS.
- Automated Monitoring: This feature suggests a proactive approach to website performance, potentially alerting users when new unused CSS is detected.
Showing a Visual Diff of the Clean CSS File
Transparency and confidence are key when making significant code changes. Cowrywise.com Reviews
A visual difference diff tool is invaluable for this.
- Clarity and Verification: A visual diff allows developers to see exactly what changes have been made to their CSS file. They can compare the original with the optimized version side-by-side.
- Build Trust: This level of transparency helps build trust in the service. Developers can verify that only unused code has been removed and that no essential styling has been inadvertently altered.
- Debugging and Assurance: In the rare event of an issue post-optimization, the diff helps in quickly identifying if a necessary rule was mistakenly removed, aiding in rapid debugging and restoration.
Setting a Custom User Agent for Crawling
For advanced users or specific website configurations, controlling how the service crawls the site is important.
- Specific Crawling Needs: Websites might block certain user agents, or they might serve different content based on the user agent e.g., mobile vs. desktop versions.
- Accurate Analysis: By allowing a custom user agent, Unused-css.com can accurately simulate specific browsing environments, ensuring the most precise identification of unused CSS relevant to that context.
- Flexibility for Complex Setups: This feature caters to websites with complex server configurations, CDN setups, or specific caching strategies that might require a particular user agent for proper crawling.
The Science of Unused CSS: Why 35% is a Real Number
The claim that “about 35% of CSS code is completely unnecessary” might seem high to some, but it’s a statistic corroborated by various web performance studies and real-world observations.
Understanding why this happens illuminates the problem Unused-css.com aims to solve.
Development Practices and Code Bloat
Several factors contribute to the accumulation of unused CSS over time. Gdevelop.com Reviews
- Framework Overload: Many websites start with large CSS frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Tailwind CSS. While these frameworks provide immense utility, developers often only use a fraction of the available components and utility classes, leaving a significant portion of the framework’s CSS unused. A 2019 HTTP Archive report showed that Bootstrap’s average CSS size was around 100KB, with a substantial portion often going unused.
- Iterative Design and Development: Websites evolve. Features are added, removed, or redesigned. Often, old CSS rules pertaining to deprecated features or design elements are left behind, cluttering the stylesheet.
- Copy-Pasting and Third-Party Integrations: Developers might copy CSS snippets from older projects or integrate third-party widgets and plugins that come with their own stylesheets, some of which might contain redundant rules or overlap with existing styles.
- Lack of Purging Tools: Without specific tools or disciplined manual processes, identifying and removing these unused rules is incredibly time-consuming and prone to error, leading to their persistence.
The Problem with Style Sheets
Unlike JavaScript, where unused code might not be executed tree-shaking, all CSS rules in a stylesheet, whether used or not, must be parsed by the browser.
- Parsing Overhead: Even if a rule doesn’t apply to any element on the page, the browser still has to read, interpret, and store that rule in its internal representation CSSOM – CSS Object Model. This takes time and memory.
- Blocking Render: CSS is a render-blocking resource. This means the browser won’t display the page until all CSS has been downloaded and parsed. The more CSS there is, the longer this blocking period.
- Increased Network Requests: For large CSS files, the browser might need to make multiple requests, further delaying page load. While HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 improve this, smaller files are always better.
- Cache Invalidation: If a large stylesheet changes even slightly, the entire file needs to be re-downloaded by the user’s browser, potentially negating caching benefits. Smaller, more modular CSS is less likely to suffer from this.
Real-World Data and Studies
The “35% unused” figure isn’t just a marketing claim.
- Google Lighthouse Reports: Tools like Google Lighthouse frequently highlight “Eliminate render-blocking resources” and “Reduce unused CSS” as critical optimization opportunities, often showing significant potential savings in CSS size. For many websites, a Lighthouse audit will reveal several kilobytes or even megabytes of unused CSS.
- Web Almanac 2022 CSS Chapter: This comprehensive annual report on the state of the web often details the average CSS bytes transferred. While specific percentages of unused CSS are harder to directly measure across the entire web, the prevalence of large stylesheets and the emphasis on critical CSS suggest a substantial amount of unused code. In 2022, the average CSS bytes for desktop was 65KB, and for mobile it was 62KB. A significant portion of this could be redundant.
- Industry Tools and Best Practices: The very existence and popularity of tools like PurgeCSS, UnusedCSS, and various build-time optimizers underscore the widespread nature of the unused CSS problem. Web development best practices consistently advocate for “critical CSS” and “purging” unused styles.
User Testimonials and Credibility Indicators
The Unused-css.com website prominently features testimonials, which are crucial for building trust and demonstrating the effectiveness of their service.
These insights provide a qualitative assessment of the tool’s impact on real users. Prepdeck.com Reviews
“Reduced Load Times and Enabled Us to Deliver a Better Product”
This testimonial, attributed to “@BrilliantDirect,” highlights direct, tangible benefits.
- Complex Platform Management: The mention of managing a “complex platform that is constantly being updated” suggests that the client is dealing with a challenging and dynamic environment where performance optimization is critical.
- Direct Impact on User Experience: The phrase “reduced load times and enabled us to deliver a better product to our users” directly connects the service to improved user experience and product quality. This resonates with the “Faster Website” and “Stronger Engagement” claims on the homepage.
- Ongoing Use: The statement “We use Unused CSS to improve our system by removing erroneous and unneeded CSS code” implies continuous, rather than one-off, utilization, suggesting satisfaction with the long-term benefits.
“The Best Tool I Could Find, Highly Recommended!”
This concise yet powerful endorsement from “@RlfSkirr” speaks to the user’s positive experience and preference for Unused-css.com over alternatives.
- Comparative Advantage: “The best tool I could find” suggests that the user likely evaluated other solutions before settling on Unused-css.com, implying that it outperformed competitors in their experience.
- Strong Recommendation: “Highly recommended!” is a clear call to action and a strong vote of confidence, which can influence potential new users.
- Simplicity and Effectiveness: While brief, the statement hints at the tool’s effectiveness and ease of use, which are often key factors for developers looking for practical solutions.
Credibility and Authenticity
While testimonials are valuable, their authenticity is often questioned.
- Social Media Handles: The inclusion of Twitter handles @BrilliantDirect, @RlfSkirr adds a layer of authenticity. While not direct links, it allows users to potentially verify the existence of these accounts and adds a human element to the feedback.
- Specific Benefits Mentioned: The testimonials don’t just say “it’s good”. they elaborate on specific benefits like “reduced load times,” “better product,” and being the “best tool.” This specificity makes them more believable than generic praise.
- Addressing Pain Points: Both testimonials directly address common pain points of web development – managing complex code and finding effective optimization tools.
Comparing Unused-css.com with Manual Optimization
The website itself acknowledges manual CSS optimization, stating, “Using a tool to optimize CSS files isn’t suitable for everyone. Learn how to optimize your CSS manually.
Be warned though, using a tool is often much simpler.” This provides a balanced perspective, acknowledging that while manual methods exist, automated tools offer significant advantages. Cookiebot.com Reviews
Manual Optimization: The “Hard” Way
Manually finding and removing unused CSS is a painstaking process, often likened to finding a needle in a haystack, especially for large, complex websites.
- Developer Tools: Browsers’ developer tools like Chrome DevTools’ Coverage tab can identify unused bytes in CSS. However, this only shows what’s unused on the currently loaded page. To get a full picture, one would need to navigate through every page and every possible state e.g., dropdowns, modals, hover effects to capture all used CSS. This is impractical for even moderately sized sites.
- Code Review and Auditing: Manual code review involves developers meticulously going through stylesheets and trying to ascertain if a rule is actually in use. This is highly prone to error, time-consuming, and requires deep knowledge of the entire codebase, including JavaScript interactions.
- Risk of Breaking Layouts: Accidentally deleting a crucial CSS rule can lead to significant layout or functional regressions, requiring time to debug and fix. The fear of breaking things often deters developers from aggressive manual cleanup.
- Scalability Issues: For large applications with thousands of lines of CSS and hundreds of pages, manual optimization is simply not scalable or sustainable.
Automated Tools: The “Simpler” Way
Unused-css.com, like other automated tools, aims to simplify and streamline this complex process.
- Efficiency and Speed: Automated tools can scan entire websites, including multiple pages and dynamic content, in a fraction of the time it would take a human.
- Accuracy with caveats: While no automated tool is 100% perfect especially with highly dynamic, JavaScript-driven sites, tools like Unused-css.com that scan JavaScript offer a high degree of accuracy by simulating user interactions or analyzing code paths.
- Reduced Risk: By automating the identification and providing a clean file, the risk of human error in deletion is minimized. The visual diff feature further helps in verification.
- Focus on Development: Developers can delegate the tedious task of CSS cleanup to the tool, freeing up their time to focus on building new features, improving user experience, or addressing core business logic.
- Continuous Optimization: As mentioned, services that offer regular checks provide ongoing benefits, ensuring that performance doesn’t degrade over time.
When Manual Might Still Be Relevant
While automated tools are generally superior, there are niche scenarios where manual intervention or understanding is key:
- Extremely Custom Interactions: For highly unique, one-off dynamic CSS applications that even sophisticated crawlers might miss, manual review might be necessary to confirm usage.
- Learning and Understanding: For educational purposes, or for small, static sites, manually exploring browser dev tools to understand CSS coverage can be a valuable learning exercise.
- Pre-existing Build Processes: If a team already has a highly optimized build process with tools like PurgeCSS integrated into their development pipeline, an external service might be redundant for them. However, Unused-css.com could still serve as an auditing tool to ensure no rules slip through the cracks.
In essence, Unused-css.com positions itself as a practical, time-saving solution that alleviates the burden of manual CSS optimization, allowing developers to achieve better performance with less effort.
Other Performance Tips from the Unused-css.com Blog
Beyond its core service, Unused-css.com’s blog offers additional web performance tips, indicating a broader commitment to helping users optimize their websites. Asora.com Reviews
This suggests they are not just focused on selling their service but also on providing valuable knowledge.
Removing Unused CSS Manually
As previously discussed, the blog acknowledges manual removal, emphasizing its complexity compared to automated tools.
This guide serves as a resource for those who might prefer or need to understand the manual process.
- Educational Value: It demonstrates transparency by educating users on alternative methods, even if they are more difficult.
- Understanding the Problem: By outlining the manual steps, it implicitly highlights the significant value proposition of an automated solution like Unused-css.com.
- Tooling Context: It frames their service within the broader context of web performance optimization techniques.
Other Ways To Improve Your Performance
This section broadly touches upon other critical aspects of website speed, indicating a holistic understanding of web performance.
- Beyond CSS: It signifies that while CSS optimization is crucial, it’s part of a larger ecosystem of performance enhancements.
- Holistic Approach: A good performance strategy involves optimizing images, leveraging caching, minimizing JavaScript, and optimizing server response times, among other things. While the blog likely doesn’t go into deep detail for every point, its mention acknowledges these areas.
- User Empowerment: Providing these tips empowers users to take additional steps to improve their site’s speed, even beyond using Unused-css.com.
Speed Up JavaScript Loading With Async & Defer
This specific tip delves into JavaScript optimization, a major factor in web performance. Recombee.com Reviews
- Understanding Browser Rendering: The blog explains “how a web page gets loaded and parsed,” which is fundamental to understanding performance bottlenecks. This educational approach is valuable.
- Asynchronous Loading: Explaining
async
anddefer
attributes for<script>
tags is a crucial optimization technique.async
: Scripts withasync
attributes are downloaded asynchronously and executed as soon as they are available, without blocking the HTML parsing. This is ideal for independent scripts like analytics or third-party widgets.defer
: Scripts withdefer
attributes are also downloaded asynchronously but executed only after the HTML document has been fully parsed. This is suitable for scripts that depend on the DOM being ready, such as those manipulating elements or initializing interactive components.
- Impact on First Contentful Paint FCP and Time to Interactive TTI: By preventing JavaScript from blocking the main thread,
async
anddefer
can significantly improve FCP when the first content is painted on the screen and TTI when the page becomes fully interactive. - Reducing Render-Blocking Resources: This directly addresses another common Lighthouse audit warning, helping users achieve better performance scores.
The presence of these blog articles reinforces Unused-css.com’s position not just as a tool provider but as an authority in the web performance space.
By sharing knowledge, they build credibility and provide added value to their audience.
Potential Downsides and Considerations
While Unused-css.com presents a compelling solution for CSS optimization, it’s important for users to consider a few potential aspects and limitations inherent to such automated tools.
No tool is a silver bullet, and understanding its boundaries ensures realistic expectations and proper implementation.
Dependence on Crawling Accuracy
The effectiveness of Unused-css.com hinges on its ability to accurately crawl and interpret a website’s CSS usage. Kumulos.com Reviews
- Dynamic Content Challenges: While the website states it scans JavaScript, highly dynamic websites, Single Page Applications SPAs with complex routing, or sites heavily reliant on user interactions to reveal CSS e.g., hidden states revealed only after specific clicks can still pose challenges for crawlers. If a crawler doesn’t “see” a particular state, the CSS for that state might be incorrectly flagged as unused.
- JavaScript Execution: The tool’s ability to execute and understand client-side JavaScript is crucial. If certain JS code is not executed during the crawl, or if it relies on specific external data, the CSS it controls might be missed.
- Authentication and Paywalls: If parts of a website are behind a login or paywall, the tool would need appropriate credentials or configurations to access and analyze the CSS within those restricted areas. The custom user agent feature might help, but it’s still a consideration.
Integration into Existing Workflows
For developers with established build processes, integrating an external service might require adjustments.
- Build-Time vs. Runtime: Unused-css.com appears to be a runtime or post-development optimization tool. Many modern web projects use build-time tools like PurgeCSS, PostCSS, or Webpack loaders to remove unused CSS during the compilation process. For teams already leveraging these, Unused-css.com might be redundant or serve as a complementary auditing tool rather than a primary optimizer.
- API Availability: The website doesn’t explicitly mention a public API. For continuous integration/continuous deployment CI/CD pipelines, an API would be essential for automating the CSS cleanup process without manual intervention. Without one, users might have to manually upload CSS or retrieve optimized files, potentially slowing down automated deployments.
- Learning Curve: While the service aims for simplicity, integrating any new tool into a development workflow always involves some learning curve and configuration.
Cost and Pricing Model
The website’s homepage does not display pricing information.
This means potential users would need to investigate further to understand the cost implications.
- Subscription vs. One-Time: Is it a subscription service for ongoing checks, or a one-time fee per project? The “regularly check your website for changes” feature suggests a subscription model.
- Tiered Pricing: Pricing often varies based on the number of pages scanned, frequency of checks, or advanced features. This could impact small projects differently than large enterprises.
- Return on Investment ROI: While the performance benefits are clear, users need to weigh the cost against the potential ROI in terms of improved conversions, lower bounce rates, and reduced developer time.
Over-Optimization Risks
While rare with intelligent tools, aggressive CSS purging can sometimes lead to unintended consequences.
- Edge Cases and Hidden States: As mentioned, CSS for less frequently accessed elements or hidden states e.g., specific error messages, rare modal pop-ups, dynamically inserted content could theoretically be identified as “unused” if the crawler doesn’t trigger those states.
- Manual Review Still Recommended: Even with automated tools, it’s always good practice to visually review the optimized website across different browsers and devices to ensure no styling has been inadvertently removed. The visual diff feature helps immensely here.
- Specificity and Inheritance: CSS can be complex with inheritance and specificity rules. An optimizer needs to be smart enough not to remove a seemingly unused rule if it’s the only rule applying a specific style due to a complex cascade.
In summary, while Unused-css.com addresses a critical performance issue, users should approach it with an understanding of its operational nuances, potential integration considerations, and the importance of verification. Vaizle.com Reviews
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Unused-css.com?
Unused-css.com is an online service designed to help website owners and developers identify and remove unused CSS Cascading Style Sheets code from their websites to improve performance, load times, and code maintainability.
How does Unused-css.com work?
Based on looking at the website, Unused-css.com automatically scans your website’s HTML and JavaScript files to determine which CSS rules are actively being used.
It then provides clean, optimized CSS files for download, effectively removing the redundant code.
Why is removing unused CSS important for my website?
Removing unused CSS is crucial because it leads to faster website load times less data to download and parse, stronger user engagement reduced bounce rates and improved experience, and more maintainable code less clutter for developers.
Can Unused-css.com improve my website’s speed?
Yes, based on the website’s claims, a core benefit of Unused-css.com is significantly improving website speed by reducing the size of your CSS files and the amount of CSS the browser needs to process. Partsbox.com Reviews
Is Unused-css.com compatible with WordPress?
Yes, the website explicitly states that Unused-css.com is compatible with WordPress and other popular platforms like Bootstrap.
Does Unused-css.com scan JavaScript files for CSS rules?
Yes, the website highlights that Unused-css.com scans JavaScript files to identify CSS rules that might be dynamically applied, ensuring more accurate unused CSS detection.
Will Unused-css.com break my website’s design?
While any automated tool carries a minimal risk, Unused-css.com aims to prevent this by meticulously identifying truly unused rules and by offering features like a visual diff of the clean CSS file, allowing users to verify changes.
How often can Unused-css.com check my website for changes?
The website indicates that Unused-css.com can “regularly check your website for changes,” implying an ongoing monitoring service rather than just a one-time scan.
What kind of output does Unused-css.com provide?
Unused-css.com provides clean CSS files for download after it has identified and removed the unused rules. Salieo.com Reviews
It also mentions showing a visual diff of the changes.
Can I manually remove unused CSS instead of using a tool?
Yes, you can manually remove unused CSS using browser developer tools, but as Unused-css.com’s blog notes, it’s often a much more complex, time-consuming, and error-prone process compared to using an automated tool.
What are the main benefits of using an automated tool like Unused-css.com?
The main benefits include efficiency, accuracy especially with dynamic content analysis, reduced risk of error, and freeing up developer time to focus on other tasks.
Is Unused-css.com suitable for large, complex websites?
Based on the testimonials and features like scanning JavaScript and handling responsive design, Unused-css.com appears designed to handle complex platforms and ongoing updates, suggesting suitability for larger sites.
Does Unused-css.com help with Core Web Vitals?
Yes, by significantly reducing CSS file sizes and improving load times, Unused-css.com can indirectly help improve Core Web Vitals metrics like Largest Contentful Paint LCP and First Input Delay FID. Exportfb.com Reviews
Does Unused-css.com offer any other performance tips?
Yes, the Unused-css.com blog provides additional web performance tips, such as how to manually remove unused CSS, other general performance improvements, and tips on speeding up JavaScript loading with async and defer.
What is the average percentage of unused CSS on a website?
Unused-css.com claims that, on average, about 35% of CSS code is completely unnecessary, a figure supported by general web performance observations.
Do I need technical knowledge to use Unused-css.com?
While the service aims for simplicity, users would likely benefit from some understanding of web development and CSS to properly implement the optimized files and verify the results.
Does Unused-css.com offer a custom user agent for crawling?
Yes, the website mentions that users can set a custom user agent for crawling their website, which can be useful for specific server configurations or testing environments.
What happens if I don’t remove unused CSS?
If you don’t remove unused CSS, your website will likely suffer from slower load times, consume more bandwidth, potentially have lower search engine rankings due to poor performance, and your codebase will be harder to maintain. Surgebook.com Reviews
How does Unused-css.com handle responsive design rules and media queries?
The website states that Unused-css.com explores responsive design rules and media queries, implying it intelligently preserves CSS necessary for different screen sizes and devices.
Where can I find the pricing for Unused-css.com?
The pricing information is not directly visible on the homepage, so potential users would need to explore the website further or contact the service to inquire about their pricing model.
Leave a Reply