Based on checking the website, whocanuse.com is a specialized online tool designed to help web developers and designers understand how color contrast affects users with various visual impairments.

Instead of just giving a technical WCAG grade, it aims to “humanize” accessibility by showing simulations of how different color combinations appear to individuals with conditions like protanomaly, deuteranopia, cataracts, and low vision, as well as in situational events like direct sunlight or night shift mode.

It’s a practical resource for anyone serious about creating inclusive digital content.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Table of Contents

Decoding Whocanuse.com: A Deep Dive into Digital Accessibility

Ever wonder if your website’s color scheme is truly legible for everyone? In a world striving for digital inclusion, tools like whocanuse.com emerge as invaluable assets.

This platform transcends basic contrast checkers, offering a nuanced perspective on how different visual impairments perceive your chosen color palettes. It’s not just about passing a technical grade.

It’s about empathetic design that considers the diverse visual experiences of your audience.

Understanding the Core Functionality: Beyond Basic Contrast Ratios

Whocanuse.com isn’t just another contrast ratio calculator. While it certainly calculates the contrast between two HEX values—leveraging robust plugins like Chroma.js for this heavy lifting—its true power lies in its ability to simulate various visual conditions. The tool then applies the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WCAG grading system to these simulated views.

HEX Value Input: Users input two hexadecimal color codes e.g., #FFFFFF for white, #000000 for black.
Contrast Calculation: The tool computes the contrast ratio, a fundamental metric in accessibility. A higher ratio generally means better readability.
WCAG Grading: It then assigns a WCAG grade e.g., AA, AAA, or Fail based on the contrast ratio, text size, and text weight.
Visual Simulations: This is where whocanuse.com stands out. It simulates how the color combination appears to individuals with specific visual impairments and under certain situational conditions.

This multi-faceted approach provides a much richer understanding than a simple pass/fail grade, making it a critical resource for inclusive design. Revoltillo.com Reviews

The Human Element: Simulating Diverse Visual Impairments

One of the most compelling aspects of whocanuse.com is its focus on the “human” aspect of accessibility. It doesn’t just tell you a numerical ratio. it shows you what someone with a particular visual condition sees. This experiential insight is crucial for fostering empathy in design.

Protanomaly and Protanopia: Red-Green Color Blindness

Protanomaly: Affects approximately 1.3% of the population. Individuals with protanomaly have reduced sensitivity to red light, leading to trouble distinguishing between reds and greens. The tool simulates how your colors would appear with this reduced red perception.
Protanopia: Affects about 1.5% of the population. This is a more severe form where individuals are “red blind” and cannot see reds at all. Whocanuse.com provides a stark visual representation of this complete absence of red perception.

Understanding these distinctions is vital, as a design that looks fine to someone with normal vision might be entirely unreadable for someone with protanopia.

Deuteranomaly and Deuteranopia: Another Facet of Red-Green Color Blindness

Deuteranomaly: More common, affecting roughly 5.3% of the population. Similar to protanomaly, it involves reduced sensitivity to green light, also causing difficulty distinguishing reds and greens. This simulation shows how your colors would shift under this green-deficient perception.
Deuteranopia: Affects around 1.2% of the population and is characterized as “green blind,” meaning individuals cannot see greens at all. The tool’s simulation highlights how your design would look without any green perception, revealing potential readability issues.

Collectively, red-green color blindness affects a significant portion of the male population, making these simulations particularly relevant for broad accessibility.

Tritanomaly and Tritanopia: Blue-Yellow Color Blindness

Tritanomaly: A much rarer condition, affecting approximately 0.02% of the population. It involves trouble distinguishing blues and greens, as well as yellows and reds. The simulation demonstrates the subtle shifts in color perception for these individuals.
Tritanopia: Even rarer, impacting about 0.03% of the population. This condition means individuals are unable to distinguish between blues and greens, purples and reds, and yellows and pinks. Whocanuse.com provides a visual approximation of this highly limited color perception.

While less common, ignoring these forms of color blindness still alienates a segment of your audience, making the tool’s inclusion of these simulations a valuable asset.

Achromatomaly and Achromatopsia: Partial and Complete Color Blindness

Achromatomaly: Affects roughly 0.09% of the population. This is a form of partial color blindness where individuals see the absence of most colors, resulting in a very desaturated perception. The tool showcases how your colors would appear under this significantly diminished color perception.
Achromatopsia: The most severe form, affecting approximately 0.05% of the population. Individuals with achromatopsia experience complete color blindness, seeing only shades of gray. Whocanuse.com provides a stark, grayscale representation of how your design would appear to these users.

Designing for these conditions often requires a complete rethinking of how information is conveyed, moving beyond color reliance. Processkit.com Reviews

Age-Related and Medical Vision Conditions

Beyond color blindness, whocanuse.com also simulates conditions prevalent among older populations or those with specific medical diagnoses.

Cataracts: Affecting an estimated 33% of the population, cataracts cause a clouding of the eye’s lens, leading to blurry and diminished vision. The tool simulates this effect, showing how your design might appear hazy or washed out.
Glaucoma: Impacts around 2% of the population and involves slight vision loss, often peripheral. While a full simulation of peripheral loss is complex, the tool approximates the overall impact on clarity.
Low Vision: A broad category affecting approximately 31% of the population, characterized by decreased and/or blurry vision not correctable by standard means. The simulation gives an idea of how text and elements might blur or become less distinct.

Considering these conditions is paramount, especially for websites targeting a broad demographic, including seniors.

Situational Accessibility: Beyond the Impairment

Accessibility isn’t just about permanent impairments.

It also encompasses temporary or situational limitations.

Whocanuse.com acknowledges this by simulating common environmental factors that can impact readability. Benetalk.com Reviews

Direct Sunlight Simulation

Impact: When viewing a screen outdoors in direct sunlight, the display often appears washed out, and colors become difficult to distinguish. This is due to the intense external light source overpowering the screen’s illumination.
Tool’s Value: The tool simulates this glare and reduced contrast, helping designers understand if their chosen colors will remain legible even under bright outdoor conditions. This is particularly relevant for mobile-first designs where outdoor usage is common.

Night Shift Mode Simulation

Impact: Many devices now offer a “night shift” or “blue light filter” mode, which alters the screen’s color temperature to reduce blue light emission, often making the display appear warmer and more orange-toned.
Tool’s Value: The simulation shows how your colors would shift in this mode, revealing potential issues where cool colors might become muddy or where contrast is unexpectedly reduced due to the altered color spectrum. This ensures your design holds up under common user preferences.

The WCAG Grading System: What a “Fail” Truly Means

Whocanuse.com integrates the widely recognized Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WCAG grading system. This system categorizes content based on its adherence to accessibility standards, with “AA” and “AAA” being desirable and a “Fail” indicating significant issues.

Understanding Grades: AA vs. AAA

WCAG AA Level AA: This is generally considered the minimum standard for accessibility. It means your content is perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for a significant portion of users, including those with disabilities. Many legal and policy frameworks require WCAG 2.1 AA compliance.
WCAG AAA Level AAA: This is the highest level of accessibility, signifying an exceptional degree of compliance. Achieving AAA means your content is accessible to the widest possible range of users and often caters to more severe forms of disability. It’s often difficult to achieve AAA for all aspects of a website, but striving for it where possible is commendable.

The Implications of a “Fail” Grade

When whocanuse.com reports a “Fail,” it’s not just a technical error. it’s a critical warning.

Visual Strain: A failing grade primarily indicates that the color combination offers some visual strain to the person seeing it. This strain can manifest as difficulty in distinguishing text from its background, leading to eye fatigue, frustration, and eventual abandonment of the content.
Readability Issues: For users with various impairments, a “Fail” means the text is likely unreadable or very difficult to read. This can lead to exclusion from information, inability to complete tasks like filling out a form, or simply a poor user experience.
Exclusion: Ultimately, a “Fail” signifies that your content is effectively excluding a segment of your audience. This can have significant implications, both ethical and legal, depending on the context and target audience. The tool’s clear recommendation is to “avoid if possible” such failing combinations.

Data Sources and Methodologies: The Backbone of Accuracy

For any analytical tool, the reliability of its data and methodologies is paramount.

Whocanuse.com openly shares its sources, enhancing its credibility.

Sourcing Percentage Data

The percentages for different visual impairments e.g., 1.3% for protanomaly are sourced from reputable organizations:
- colour-blindness.com: A dedicated resource for information on color vision deficiency.
- Vision Australia: A leading national not-for-profit organization providing services to people who are blind or have low vision.
Important Caveat: The website transparently states that the population data are estimates for individual impairments and do not account for the vast amount of visual impairments globally. This means the percentages, while indicative, are not exhaustive or designed to sum up to 100%. Their purpose is to provide an understanding of who is affected, not to offer a definitive demographic breakdown.

Technical Implementation: Plugins and Custom Simulations

The creator, Corey Ginnivan, outlines the technical stack that underpins the tool’s functionality. Riptide.com Reviews

Chroma.js: This powerful JavaScript library handles the heavy lifting for calculating the contrast between two HEX values. It’s a robust and widely used tool in the web development community for color manipulation and analysis.
Color-blind Plugin: This aptly named plugin is crucial for the color blindness simulations. It converts the original HEX codes into what would be seen by individuals with specific impairments, allowing the tool to then apply its standard contrast assessment process to these converted colors.
Personal Simulations: For conditions like cataracts, glaucoma, low vision, and the situational events direct sunlight, night shift mode, Corey Ginnivan has personally created the simulations. This bespoke approach suggests a deep understanding and careful crafting of these specific visual effects, aiming for accuracy in representing the user experience.

This blend of established libraries and custom development ensures both foundational accuracy and specialized simulations for unique visual scenarios.

Who Benefits Most from Whocanuse.com?

While anyone interested in web design can gain insight from this tool, certain professionals and teams will find it exceptionally valuable in their daily workflows.

Web Developers and UI/UX Designers

Proactive Accessibility: Instead of fixing accessibility issues post-launch, developers and designers can use this tool during the design and development phases. This proactive approach saves time and resources.
Informed Design Decisions: It allows them to make informed choices about color palettes, font weights, and text sizes, ensuring compliance with WCAG standards from the outset.
Enhanced User Experience: By designing for a wider audience, they can significantly improve the user experience for everyone, not just those with visual impairments. This leads to higher engagement and lower bounce rates.

Content Strategists and Marketers

Inclusive Content Creation: Content isn’t just about text. it’s also about its presentation. Marketers can use this tool to ensure their visual branding and content layouts are accessible, preventing alienation of potential customers.
Brand Reputation: Demonstrating a commitment to accessibility enhances a brand’s reputation, positioning it as inclusive and socially responsible.
Wider Reach: Accessible content naturally reaches a broader audience, potentially expanding market share and engagement.

Digital Agencies and Consultants

Client Deliverables: Agencies can use whocanuse.com to ensure their client projects meet accessibility standards, providing demonstrable proof of compliance.
Competitive Advantage: Offering accessibility auditing and implementation as a service can be a significant differentiator in a crowded market.
Risk Mitigation: Ensuring websites are accessible can help clients avoid potential legal challenges related to discrimination.

Educators and Students in Design/Development

Learning Tool: It serves as an excellent educational resource for understanding the practical implications of accessibility guidelines.
Empathy Building: The visual simulations are particularly effective in fostering empathy for users with diverse visual needs, a critical component of human-centered design.
Practical Application: Students can apply theoretical knowledge of WCAG directly to real-world design scenarios.

Contributing to the Open-Source Initiative

Whocanuse.com isn’t just a static tool.

It’s an open-source project, inviting collaboration and continuous improvement.

This approach aligns with the spirit of the web itself and ensures the tool remains relevant and accurate. Offsiter.com Reviews

Forking the Repo and Submitting PRs

GitHub Repository: The project is hosted on GitHub, the de facto platform for open-source collaboration. Users are encouraged to “fork the repo” create a copy of the project in their own GitHub account.
Pull Requests PRs: After making improvements or additions, users can submit “pull requests” PRs, which propose their changes to the main project. The maintainer, Corey Ginnivan, then reviews these changes for integration.
Benefits of Contribution:
- Bug Fixes: Identifying and correcting errors.
- Feature Enhancements: Adding new simulations, improving existing ones, or introducing new functionalities.
- Documentation Improvements: Clarifying explanations or adding more comprehensive guides.
- Community Building: Fostering a collaborative environment around web accessibility.

This open-source model ensures that the tool can evolve with new research, web standards, and community needs, making it a dynamic and increasingly valuable resource.

The Vision Behind Whocanuse.com: Beyond Compliance

The creator’s stated goal for whocanuse.com goes beyond mere compliance with WCAG guidelines.

It’s about “humanizing the people who are affected by the different grades.” This is a profound distinction.

Shifting from Compliance to Empathy

Many accessibility tools focus solely on reporting technical violations. While crucial for compliance, this approach often lacks the deeper understanding of why those violations matter. Whocanuse.com bridges this gap by visually demonstrating the impact.

Technical Data: It provides the contrast ratio and WCAG grade.
Experiential Insight: It couples this with simulations, allowing designers to see through the eyes of someone with a visual impairment.

This dual approach helps designers internalize the importance of accessibility, moving it from a checkbox item to a core design principle driven by empathy. Monitoro.com Reviews

The Continuous Journey of Accessibility

Whocanuse.com is a testament to the ongoing journey of making digital content truly universal. It serves as a reminder that:

Accessibility is Not a One-Time Fix: It’s an ongoing process of auditing, testing, and iterating.
User Diversity is Key: Designing for the “average” user often overlooks a significant portion of the population.
Tools Empower Designers: Resources like whocanuse.com provide the necessary insights to build a more inclusive web.

It empowers designers and developers to move beyond superficial compliance and genuinely embrace the principles of universal design.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is whocanuse.com?

Whocanuse.com is an online tool that helps web designers and developers understand how color contrast affects people with various visual impairments by simulating how different color combinations appear to them.

Is whocanuse.com a free tool?

Yes, based on the website’s information and its open-source nature, whocanuse.com appears to be a free-to-use online tool.

How does whocanuse.com calculate contrast ratios?

Based on looking at the website, whocanuse.com uses a plugin called Chroma.js to calculate the contrast between two HEX color values. Ohsnap.com Reviews

Does whocanuse.com simulate all types of color blindness?

Yes, based on the website, it simulates various forms of color blindness including Protanomaly, Protanopia, Deuteranomaly, Deuteranopia, Tritanomaly, Tritanopia, Achromatomaly, and Achromatopsia.

What are the WCAG grades that whocanuse.com uses?

Based on the website’s description, whocanuse.com uses the standard WCAG grading system, including AA, AAA, and a “Fail” grade, which indicates a problematic color combination.

What does a “Fail” grade mean on whocanuse.com?

Based on looking at the website, a “Fail” grade means the color combination offers some visual strain to the person seeing it and should be avoided if possible due to poor readability.

Can whocanuse.com simulate vision conditions like cataracts or glaucoma?

Yes, based on the website, it includes simulations for cataracts, glaucoma, and low vision, providing insight into how these conditions affect color perception and readability.

Does whocanuse.com account for situational lighting conditions?

Yes, based on the website, it can simulate the effect of direct sunlight and night shift mode on color combinations, helping designers understand real-world viewing challenges. Camille.com Reviews

Where does whocanuse.com get its data on affected percentages?

Based on the website, the percentages for affected populations are sourced from colour-blindness.com and Vision Australia.

Is the percentage data on whocanuse.com comprehensive adds up to 100%?

No, based on the website’s explanation, the population data are estimates for individual impairments and do not cover all visual impairments, so they do not add up to 100%.

Can I contribute to the development of whocanuse.com?

Yes, based on the website, whocanuse.com is an open-source project, and users are encouraged to fork the repository on GitHub and submit pull requests with helpful additions or changes.

Who created and maintains whocanuse.com?

Based on the website’s footer, whocanuse.com is created and maintained by @CoreyGinnivan.

Is whocanuse.com suitable for beginners in web design?

Yes, based on its straightforward interface and clear visual simulations, it can be a highly beneficial tool for beginners to understand accessibility concepts. Volunteer-world.com Reviews

How does whocanuse.com help with WCAG compliance?

Based on looking at the website, it helps by visually demonstrating how color choices impact different users, allowing designers to ensure their designs meet WCAG guidelines for contrast and readability.

Does whocanuse.com require any software installation?

No, based on it being a web-based tool, whocanuse.com does not require any software installation. it runs directly in your web browser.

Can whocanuse.com be used to check existing website colors?

Yes, based on the tool’s functionality, you can input the HEX codes of colors used on an existing website to check their contrast and accessibility.

What is the primary purpose of whocanuse.com?

Based on the website, its primary purpose is to bring attention and understanding to how color contrast can affect different people with visual impairments, thereby humanizing accessibility.

Does whocanuse.com suggest alternative colors?

Based on looking at the website, whocanuse.com evaluates your input but does not directly suggest alternative color combinations. It shows you the impact of your current choices. Meetfox.com Reviews

Is whocanuse.com useful for mobile app design?

Yes, based on the principles of color contrast and accessibility being universal, whocanuse.com is just as useful for mobile app design as it is for web design.

How accurate are the visual simulations on whocanuse.com?

Based on the information provided, the simulations leverage specific plugins like Color-blind for color blindness and custom-created simulations for other conditions, aiming to provide a representative visual experience.

0.0

0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)

Excellent0%

Very good0%

Average0%

Poor0%

Terrible0%

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Whocanuse.com Reviews
Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Whocanuse.com Reviews