Xor Encryption In C

To encrypt or decrypt data using XOR in C, you’ll leverage the bitwise exclusive OR operator (^). This operator is fundamental because of its unique property: applying XOR with the same key twice returns the original value (A ^ K ^ K = A). This makes it perfect for symmetric encryption where the same key is used for both processes.

Here are the detailed steps to implement XOR encryption in C:

Include Necessary Headers: You’ll need <stdio.h> for input/output operations and <string.h> for string manipulation functions like strlen.
Define the XOR Function: Create a function, say xor_cipher, that takes two arguments: a pointer to the data (the message to be encrypted/decrypted) and a pointer to the key.
- Inside this function, get the lengths of both the data and the key using strlen.
- Loop through each character of the data.
- For each character data[i], perform the XOR operation with the corresponding character from the key: data[i] = data[i] ^ key[i % key_len];. The i % key_len ensures that if the key is shorter than the data, it wraps around and repeats.

Implement in main Function:

0.0

0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)

Excellent0%

Very good0%

Average0%

Poor0%

Terrible0%

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Xor encryption in
Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Declare a character array for your message (plaintext) and another for your key. Ensure your message array is large enough to hold the modified (encrypted/decrypted) string.
Print the original message to observe the starting point.
Call your xor_cipher function to encrypt the message. The message array will be modified in place.
To see the encrypted output, you might need to print it in hexadecimal format, as the XORed characters might not be printable ASCII. Use printf("%02X", (unsigned char)message[i]); to display each byte as a two-digit hexadecimal number.
Call xor_cipher again with the same message (which is now encrypted) and the same key to decrypt it.
Print the message again; it should now revert to its original plaintext form.

This simple xor cipher in c implementation highlights the core concept. While xor encryption in c is easy to code and serves as an excellent educational example for define encryption in cryptography, it’s crucial to understand that simple XOR with a repeating key is not secure for real-world applications. It’s highly susceptible to attacks like frequency analysis, making a xor cipher cracker relatively straightforward to build. However, understanding why is xor used in cryptography at a fundamental level is key, as it forms a building block within much more complex and robust algorithms. For instance, in xor encryption ctf challenges, it’s often used to teach basic crypto vulnerabilities.

Table of Contents

Understanding the Fundamentals of XOR Encryption in C

When we talk about xor encryption in c, we’re essentially discussing one of the simplest symmetric encryption methods available. Symmetric means the same key is used for both encryption and decryption. The core of this operation lies in the bitwise XOR operator (^). This isn’t just an arbitrary choice; XOR has unique properties that make it incredibly useful in cryptographic contexts, even if a simple implementation isn’t considered secure on its own.

What is the XOR Operation?

The Exclusive OR (XOR) operation, often denoted as XOR or ⊕, is a logical bitwise operator that outputs true (or 1) if and only if its inputs differ. If both inputs are the same, it outputs false (or 0). Let’s break it down:

0 XOR 0 = 0 (Inputs are the same)
0 XOR 1 = 1 (Inputs differ)
1 XOR 0 = 1 (Inputs differ)
1 XOR 1 = 0 (Inputs are the same)

This simple truth table is the foundation. When applied to characters in C, which are essentially numerical ASCII or Unicode values, the XOR operation works on their binary representations bit by bit. For instance, if you XOR the character ‘A’ (ASCII 65, binary 01000001) with a key character ‘K’ (ASCII 75, binary 01001011), each corresponding bit is XORed.

Why is XOR Reversible and How Does it Enable Encryption?

The magic of XOR in encryption comes from its reversibility. Consider two values, A (your plaintext data) and K (your key).
If you perform A ^ K, you get a result, let’s call it C (the ciphertext).
Now, if you take C and XOR it with the same key K again, you get C ^ K.
Substituting C with A ^ K, we get (A ^ K) ^ K.
Due to the associative property of XOR, this simplifies to A ^ (K ^ K).
Since K ^ K always results in 0 (because any number XORed with itself is zero, e.g., 5 ^ 5 = 0), the expression becomes A ^ 0.
And A ^ 0 is simply A.

Key Takeaway: A ^ K ^ K = A. This property is what makes XOR a fundamental building block for define encryption in cryptography. You apply the key once to encrypt, and apply the same key again to decrypt, retrieving the original data. This elegant mathematical property makes it incredibly efficient for symmetric xor cipher in c implementations. Ascii to text chart

Advantages and Disadvantages of Simple XOR Cipher

While simple xor encryption in c might seem appealing due to its ease of implementation, it comes with a significant set of trade-offs.

Advantages:

Simplicity: It’s incredibly easy to understand and implement. A few lines of xor encryption c code can perform the encryption/decryption. This makes it a popular starting point for learning about cryptographic concepts.
Speed: XOR operations are bitwise and can be executed very quickly by processors, making it efficient for large amounts of data.
Reversibility: As discussed, the self-inverse property (A ^ K ^ K = A) makes decryption straightforward.
Low Resource Usage: It doesn’t require complex mathematical libraries or significant memory, making it suitable for embedded systems or environments with limited resources.

Disadvantages (and why it’s `not secure`):

Vulnerability to Known-Plaintext Attack: If an attacker knows a piece of the plaintext and its corresponding ciphertext, they can deduce the key. For example, if P ^ K = C, then P ^ C = K. Once the key is known, all other messages encrypted with the same key are compromised. This is a critical flaw for xor cipher cracker efforts.
Vulnerability to Frequency Analysis: With a repeating key, the xor encryption pattern also repeats. For text data, character frequency analysis (e.g., ‘e’ is the most common letter in English) can be used to break the cipher. If a key is, say, 5 characters long, the ciphertext effectively becomes 5 independent Caesar ciphers, which are easy to break.
Short Keys are Weak: The shorter the key, the faster it repeats, making it easier to break using the methods above. A simple xor encryption calculator can demonstrate this vulnerability quickly.
No Authentication or Integrity: XOR encryption provides no mechanism to verify if the message has been tampered with or if it genuinely came from the sender.
Predictability: Without additional complexity (like initialization vectors, modes of operation, and strong key scheduling), the output can be predictable, leading to cryptographic weaknesses.

In essence, while xor encryption in c is a great way to grasp basic cryptographic principles and is often encountered in xor encryption ctf challenges to teach fundamental flaws, it’s never used as a standalone solution for truly secure communication. It’s a stepping stone, a building block in more sophisticated algorithms.

Implementing XOR Cipher in C: A Step-by-Step Guide

Implementing xor encryption in c is a foundational exercise for anyone diving into cryptography. It showcases the practical application of bitwise operations. Let’s walk through the detailed implementation process, including considerations for handling different data types and output formats.

Core Function Design for `xor_cipher`

The heart of your xor encryption c code will be a dedicated function. This function should be versatile enough to handle both encryption and decryption, given the self-inverse property of XOR.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h> // For malloc, free if dynamic allocation is needed

// Function to perform XOR encryption/decryption
// Modifies the 'data' in place
void xor_cipher(char *data, const char *key) {
    if (data == NULL || key == NULL) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Error: Data or key cannot be NULL.\n");
        return;
    }

    int data_len = strlen(data);
    int key_len = strlen(key);

    if (key_len == 0) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Error: Key cannot be empty.\n");
        return;
    }

    // Loop through each character of the data
    for (int i = 0; i < data_len; i++) {
        // Perform XOR operation: data character ^ key character
        // The key character is selected by using modulo to wrap around the key length
        data[i] = data[i] ^ key[i % key_len];
    }
}

Explanation of the xor_cipher function: Hex to bcd conversion in assembly language

Error Handling: It’s good practice to add basic checks for NULL pointers for data and key, and to ensure the key is not empty.
strlen(data) and strlen(key): These functions from <string.h> determine the length of the string data and the key key respectively. data_len tells us how many characters to process.
Looping through Data: The for loop iterates from the first character (i = 0) up to, but not including, the null terminator of the data string (i < data_len).
key[i % key_len]: This is the crucial part for practical XOR encryption.
- i % key_len calculates the remainder when i is divided by key_len.
- If key_len is 6 and i is 0, i % key_len is 0.
- If i is 5, i % key_len is 5.
- If i is 6, i % key_len is 0 again.
- This effectively makes the key repeat itself across the plaintext, ensuring every character in the plaintext is XORed with some character from the key, even if the key is shorter than the plaintext. This is precisely what makes simple XOR vulnerable to xor cipher cracker methods due to pattern repetition.
data[i] = data[i] ^ key[i % key_len]: This line performs the actual bitwise XOR operation. The result of the XOR is stored back into the data array, effectively encrypting (or decrypting) the character in place.

Example Usage in `main()`

Now, let’s put the xor_cipher function to use in a main function to demonstrate its capabilities.

int main() {
    // Original message. Make sure the array is large enough for potential modifications
    // and for the null terminator.
    char message[] = "This is a secret message to be encrypted.";
    char key[] = "MySuperSecretKey"; // The key used for encryption/decryption

    printf("Original message: \"%s\"\n", message);
    printf("Using key: \"%s\"\n", key);

    // --- Encryption Phase ---
    xor_cipher(message, key);

    printf("\nEncrypted message (Hexadecimal representation):\n");
    // Print the encrypted message in hexadecimal format
    // This is often necessary because encrypted characters might not be printable ASCII.
    for (int i = 0; i < strlen(message); i++) {
        printf("%02X ", (unsigned char)message[i]); // %02X ensures two hex digits, padding with 0 if needed
    }
    printf("\n");

    // --- Decryption Phase ---
    // XORing again with the same key decrypts the message
    xor_cipher(message, key);

    printf("\nDecrypted message: \"%s\"\n", message);

    return 0;
}

Key Points in main:

char message[]: This declares a character array to hold your message. When xor_cipher modifies it, the changes are reflected directly in this array.
Printing Hexadecimal: When you encrypt text, the resulting characters (data[i] ^ key[i % key_len]) might fall outside the range of printable ASCII characters. Printing them directly might result in garbled or unreadable output. Using printf("%02X ", (unsigned char)message[i]); is a standard way to display each byte of the encrypted data as a two-digit hexadecimal number, making it inspectable. The (unsigned char) cast is important to ensure the value is treated as an unsigned 8-bit number before printing as hex, preventing potential sign extension issues that could occur with char on some systems.
In-Place Modification: Notice that the message array is passed directly to xor_cipher and is modified. This saves memory but means the original plaintext is overwritten. If you need to preserve the original, you’d make a copy before encrypting.

This xor encryption in c setup provides a fully functional, albeit simple, encryption scheme. It’s an excellent starting point for exploring more complex cryptographic concepts in C or for solving xor encryption ctf problems where understanding basic vulnerabilities is key.

Outputting Encrypted Data: Hexadecimal vs. String Representation

When working with xor encryption in c, especially when dealing with the ciphertext, understanding how to properly output or represent the encrypted data is crucial. Simple string printing might not always be sufficient or accurate, primarily because XOR operations can result in non-printable characters.

Why Direct String Printing Can Be Problematic

Let’s say you have the character ‘A’ (ASCII 65, binary 01000001) and you XOR it with a key character whose ASCII value is, for instance, 10 (binary 00001010).
01000001 ^ 00001010 = 01001011 Join free online

The result, 01001011, is ASCII 75, which corresponds to the character ‘K’. In this case, both the input and output are printable characters. This looks fine.

However, what if the result of the XOR operation is, say, 00000101 (ASCII 5, ENQ – Enquiry)? This is a control character, not a visible one. If you try to printf("%s", encrypted_message);, your console might display nothing, a box, or some other placeholder, or even stop printing if it encounters a null byte (\0) prematurely. The strlen() function also stops counting at the first null byte, which could truncate your printed output if one appears in the middle of the encrypted data.

This is why merely printing an encrypted string with printf("%s", ...) is often inadequate and misleading when working with xor encryption c code.

The Power of Hexadecimal Representation

The most common and robust way to represent encrypted binary data, including the output of xor encryption, is through hexadecimal format.

Clarity and Debugging: Hexadecimal (base-16) representation uses digits 0-9 and letters A-F to represent values. Each pair of hexadecimal digits (e.g., 41, 4B, 05) perfectly represents one byte (8 bits) of data. This allows you to see the exact byte values, regardless of whether they are printable ASCII characters. This is invaluable for debugging and verifying the correctness of your xor encryption calculator or xor cipher in c implementation.
Consistency: It provides a consistent and unambiguous way to display any byte value from 00 to FF.
Avoiding Null Byte Issues: By printing each byte as two hexadecimal characters, you bypass any issues with strlen stopping at an embedded null byte or the console rendering non-printable characters incorrectly.

How to Print in Hexadecimal in C: Decimal to binary ip address conversion

As demonstrated in the example code:

for (int i = 0; i < strlen(message); i++) {
    printf("%02X ", (unsigned char)message[i]);
}
printf("\n");

%02X: This printf format specifier is key:
- %X tells printf to interpret the argument as an unsigned int and print it in uppercase hexadecimal.
- 02 specifies that the output should be at least two characters wide, padded with leading zeros if necessary (e.g., A becomes 0A, 5 becomes 05). This ensures a uniform look where each byte is clearly represented by two hex digits.
(unsigned char)message[i]: Casting message[i] to unsigned char before passing it to printf is critical.
- char in C can be signed or unsigned depending on the compiler/platform. If it’s signed, a byte with a value greater than 127 (e.g., 0xFF which is 255) would be interpreted as a negative number (e.g., -1). When printf processes a negative number with %X, it typically prints its two’s complement representation, which might be FFFFFFFF or similar, depending on the integer size, not the intended FF.
- Casting to unsigned char ensures the value is treated as an unsigned 8-bit integer, guaranteeing that 0xFF prints as FF, 0x80 prints as 80, and so on.

By adopting hexadecimal output for your encrypted data, you gain a clear, unambiguous, and debuggable representation, essential for any serious work with xor encryption c code or general binary data manipulation. This is especially relevant in contexts like xor encryption ctf where precise byte-level analysis is often required.

The Role of Key Length and Repetition in `XOR` Security

One of the most critical aspects determining the security of an xor cipher in c implementation is the length and repetition pattern of the key. This single factor largely dictates how vulnerable the xor encryption will be to various attacks.

Why Key Length Matters So Much

Imagine you have a very short key, say “AB”.
Plaintext: Hello World!
Key: ABABABABABAB (repeated)

The encryption would look like this:
H ^ A, e ^ B, l ^ A, l ^ B, o ^ A, ^ B, W ^ A, o ^ B, r ^ A, l ^ B, d ^ A, ! ^ B Octoprint ip address keeps changing

Notice the pattern: every even-indexed character of the plaintext is XORed with ‘A’, and every odd-indexed character is XORed with ‘B’. This predictable repetition creates significant weaknesses.

Consequences of Short, Repeating Keys:

Frequency Analysis Attack: For natural language plaintext (like English), certain characters appear with predictable frequencies (e.g., ‘e’ is about 12.7% of characters, ‘t’ about 9.1%).
- If you know the key length (or can guess it, say, from ciphertext length and common key lengths like 2, 3, 4, 8, 16), you can treat the ciphertext as multiple independent Caesar ciphers.
- For a 5-character key, you’d effectively have 5 separate ciphertexts (all characters XORed with key[0], all characters XORed with key[1], etc.). You can then perform frequency analysis on each of these subsets to deduce the corresponding key character. This is a classic method for a xor cipher cracker.
- According to a study on English text, the letter ‘e’ is statistically the most common character. If you find the most frequent character in a subset of your ciphertext, there’s a high probability it corresponds to the result of ‘e’ XORed with a specific key character. This gives you a strong hint about that key character.
Known-Plaintext Attack: This is perhaps the most devastating attack against simple xor encryption.
- If an attacker has access to any portion of the plaintext (P) and its corresponding ciphertext (C), they can easily recover the key (K).
- Since P ^ K = C, it directly implies P ^ C = K.
- For example, if you know the first 10 characters of a message are “Dear Sir, ” and you have the first 10 characters of the ciphertext, you can XOR them character by character to reveal the first 10 characters of the key.
- If the key repeats, knowing just a small segment of plaintext is enough to recover the entire repeating key. For a fixed-length key, recovering a segment equal to the key length is sufficient to get the full key. Data suggests that even a few dozen bytes of known plaintext can completely break a repeating key XOR cipher.
Chosen-Plaintext/Ciphertext Attacks: While perhaps less direct than known-plaintext, an attacker could also manipulate input or output if they have some control, further revealing key material.

The One-Time Pad (OTP): The Ideal (But Impractical) XOR Scenario

The only scenario where xor encryption is considered theoretically unbreakable is when it’s used as a one-time pad (OTP). The conditions for a true OTP are stringent: Quiz task online free

Key Length = Message Length: The key must be at least as long as the plaintext message.
Truly Random Key: The key must be generated using a truly random process, not a pseudo-random generator.
Never Reused: The key must be used only once for one message and then discarded. Reusing even a portion of a key instantly breaks the security.
Secret Distribution: The key must be securely distributed to both the sender and receiver without any chance of interception.

If all these conditions are met, the OTP is mathematically proven to be unbreakable, as every possible plaintext is equally likely for a given ciphertext. There’s no statistical pattern to analyze. However, the practical challenges of generating, distributing, and managing truly random keys as long as every message, and ensuring they are never reused, make OTP largely impractical for general use, especially for large volumes of data.

In summary, while XOR is fundamental in cryptography (why is xor used in cryptography often leads to discussions on its role in complex algorithms), simple xor encryption in c with a short or repeating key is incredibly weak. For any secure application, it must be combined with much more sophisticated techniques, such as those found in block ciphers like AES, which use XOR in conjunction with substitutions, permutations, and complex key schedules.

Defining Encryption and Its Importance in Modern Security

To truly appreciate xor encryption in c and its place in the cryptographic landscape, it’s essential to understand the broader concept of define encryption in cryptography. Encryption is not just about scrambling data; it’s a cornerstone of digital security, protecting sensitive information in transit and at rest.

What is Encryption?

At its core, encryption is the process of converting information or data into a code, to prevent unauthorized access. This coded information is called ciphertext, while the original, readable information is called plaintext. The transformation process uses an algorithm (a set of rules or mathematical operations) and a key (a piece of information, like a password or a random string, that controls the algorithm’s output).

The primary goal of encryption is to ensure confidentiality – that only authorized parties can understand the information. If an unauthorized person intercepts the ciphertext, it should appear as random, unintelligible data. Image compressor free online

The reverse process, converting ciphertext back into plaintext, is called decryption. This also requires the correct key and the corresponding algorithm.

Key Purposes and Importance of Encryption

In today’s interconnected world, encryption is not merely a technical detail; it’s a fundamental requirement for privacy, security, and trust.

Confidentiality (Privacy): This is the most direct benefit. Encryption ensures that sensitive data, whether it’s your personal messages, financial transactions, or classified government documents, remains private and inaccessible to eavesdroppers. Without encryption, virtually all online communication would be open to interception and reading.
- Real Data: In 2023, approximately 87% of web traffic was encrypted using HTTPS (which relies on TLS/SSL encryption), a significant increase from just 50% in 2016, highlighting the widespread adoption for confidentiality.
Data Integrity: While not a direct function of simple XOR, many modern encryption schemes incorporate mechanisms (like message authentication codes or digital signatures) to verify that data has not been altered or tampered with during transmission or storage. If even a single bit of the ciphertext is changed, decryption will fail or produce garbled results, signaling a breach of integrity.
Authentication: Encryption can be used to verify the identity of the sender or receiver. Digital certificates and public-key cryptography (though not XOR directly) allow parties to confirm who they are communicating with, preventing impersonation. Photo compressor free online
Non-Repudiation: In some cases, encryption (combined with digital signatures) provides non-repudiation, meaning a sender cannot falsely deny having sent a message. This is crucial for legal and financial transactions.
Regulatory Compliance: Numerous regulations across industries (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) mandate strong encryption for sensitive data to protect consumer privacy and prevent data breaches. Non-compliance can lead to hefty fines.
Protection Against Cyber Threats: Encryption acts as a powerful defense against various cyber threats:
- Eavesdropping: Prevents unauthorized listening to communications.
- Data Breaches: Even if a database is stolen, if its contents are encrypted, the data remains unreadable.
- Ransomware: While ransomware uses encryption (maliciously) to lock users out of their data, strong user-side encryption can make critical data unreadable to attackers even if they gain access.

Types of Encryption (Briefly)

Symmetric-Key Encryption:
- Uses a single, shared secret key for both encryption and decryption.
- Examples: AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), DES (Data Encryption Standard), Triple DES.
- XOR encryption in C is a very basic form of symmetric encryption.
- Challenge: Securely distributing the shared key.
Asymmetric-Key Encryption (Public-Key Cryptography): Notes online free cute
- Uses a pair of mathematically related keys: a public key (shared freely) and a private key (kept secret).
- Data encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the corresponding private key, and vice-versa.
- Examples: RSA, ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography).
- Use Cases: Secure key exchange (for symmetric keys), digital signatures, secure email.

In essence, encryption is an indispensable tool in the digital age, enabling secure communication, protecting personal and corporate data, and upholding privacy in a world constantly threatened by digital incursions. While xor encryption in c is simple, understanding its fundamental mechanism helps in grasping the complexity and necessity of modern, robust cryptographic solutions.

`XOR` in Real-World Cryptography: Beyond the Simple Cipher

While a standalone xor cipher in c implementation with a short, repeating key is definitively not secure for real-world applications, it’s a misconception to think that XOR has no place in modern, robust cryptography. In fact, the XOR operation is a fundamental and frequently used primitive within almost all advanced cryptographic algorithms. Why is XOR used in cryptography so extensively? Because of its unique properties: it’s fast, simple, reversible, and provides perfect diffusion (every bit of output depends on multiple bits of input) when combined with other operations.

XOR as a Building Block in Block Ciphers

Modern symmetric-key algorithms, especially block ciphers like AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and its predecessor DES (Data Encryption Standard), use XOR operations extensively. These ciphers don’t just XOR plaintext directly with a key. Instead, they perform a complex series of rounds, where each round involves:

Substitution (S-Boxes): Non-linear transformations that obscure the relationship between the plaintext and ciphertext.
Permutation (P-Boxes): Rearranging bits to spread the influence of input bits across the output.
Mixing/Diffusion: This is where XOR often plays a crucial role. Sub-keys (derived from the main secret key through a complex key schedule) are XORed with intermediate states of the data. This mixing step ensures that changes to a single bit of the plaintext or key propagate rapidly throughout the entire block, making cryptanalysis significantly harder.

Example in AES (Simplified):
In AES, one of the primary operations is AddRoundKey. This involves XORing the current state (a 4×4 matrix of bytes) with a round key (also a 4×4 matrix of bytes) derived from the main secret key. This simple bitwise XOR operation, when integrated into AES’s sophisticated structure, contributes significantly to its security. The efficiency of XOR allows these operations to be performed thousands of times per second, even on standard hardware.

Stream Ciphers and XOR

While block ciphers encrypt data in fixed-size blocks, stream ciphers encrypt data bit by bit or byte by byte, much like a one-time pad. They generate a pseudo-random keystream, which is then XORed with the plaintext to produce the ciphertext. Notes free online app

Keystream Generator: The security of a stream cipher heavily relies on the randomness and unpredictability of its keystream generator. This generator is typically a complex state machine driven by a secret key and an initialization vector (IV).
XORing with Keystream: Once the keystream bit/byte is generated, it’s simply XORed with the corresponding plaintext bit/byte.
Examples: RC4 (though largely deprecated due to vulnerabilities), ChaCha20, Salsa20.

The fundamental operation in these ciphers is the XORing of plaintext with the keystream. The complexity lies in generating a truly unpredictable and long enough keystream, not in the XOR operation itself.

Error Detection and Correction (Beyond Encryption)

XOR also has applications beyond direct encryption in areas closely related to data integrity and network protocols.

Parity Bits: A simple form of error detection uses XOR. A parity bit is appended to a block of data such that the total number of set bits (1s) in the block (including the parity bit) is always even or always odd. Calculating the XOR sum of all bits in a block effectively gives you a parity bit. If a single bit flips during transmission, the parity check will fail, indicating an error.
Checksums: More complex checksums (like CRC – Cyclic Redundancy Check) and hash functions, which are used for data integrity, often involve XOR operations as part of their mathematical computations to generate a unique digest of the data.
RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks): In RAID levels like RAID 5, parity information (redundant data used for recovery in case of disk failure) is often calculated using XOR. For example, DiskA_data XOR DiskB_data = Parity_data. If Disk A fails, you can regenerate its data using Parity_data XOR DiskB_data = DiskA_data. This offers efficient data redundancy.

In conclusion, while a simple xor encryption calculator or basic xor encryption c code demonstrates a fundamentally weak cipher, the XOR operation itself is an indispensable and versatile tool in the cryptographer’s arsenal. Its efficiency and reversibility make it a core component in the intricate designs of highly secure modern algorithms like AES and various stream ciphers, providing essential mixing, diffusion, and simple bitwise manipulation capabilities.

Security of XOR Encryption: Why It’s `Not Secure` on Its Own

The question “Is xor encryption secure?” often arises due to its simplicity and the fascinating property of reversibility. The unequivocal answer, for simple XOR ciphers (especially those with short, repeating keys), is no, it is absolutely not secure for protecting sensitive information in real-world scenarios. It’s akin to locking your front door with a piece of string – it might deter the most casual observer, but any determined individual can bypass it with minimal effort.

Fundamental Flaws Leading to Insecurity

The primary reasons a basic xor cipher in c implementation is insecure stem from its algebraic properties and the predictable patterns it leaves in the ciphertext: Remove whitespace excel column

Linearity and Predictability:
- XOR is a linear operation. This means that if you know the relationship between plaintext bits and ciphertext bits, it’s often straightforward to deduce the key bits.
- P ^ K = C is the core. If you know P and C, finding K is trivial (K = P ^ C). This makes it highly vulnerable to known-plaintext attacks. Even a small segment of known plaintext is often enough to recover the entire key if it’s repeating.
Repetitive Key Usage (Especially with Short Keys):
- As discussed, if the key is shorter than the message, it must be repeated. This repetition introduces patterns into the ciphertext.
- Frequency Analysis: For text-based plaintext, the statistical distribution of characters in a language (like the prevalence of ‘e’ or ‘space’ in English) can be exploited. If a key of length L is used, the ciphertext becomes a series of L independent substitution ciphers. An attacker can analyze the frequency of characters at positions i, i+L, i+2L, ... to deduce the i-th character of the key. This is a common method employed by xor cipher cracker tools.
- Example: A 2015 study on cryptographic attacks estimated that with about 200-300 bytes of ciphertext, a repeating key XOR cipher of typical key lengths (e.g., 5-20 bytes) can often be broken within minutes using frequency analysis.
No Diffusion or Confusion (in Simple Form):
- Diffusion means that changing one bit in the plaintext should ideally change many bits in the ciphertext.
- Confusion means making the relationship between the key and the ciphertext as complex and obscure as possible.
- Simple XOR encryption provides minimal diffusion (a change in one plaintext bit only affects one ciphertext bit) and almost no confusion. This lack of complexity makes the cipher transparent to analysis.
No Integrity or Authenticity:
- XOR encryption only aims for confidentiality. It does not provide any assurance that the message has not been altered during transmission (integrity) or that it originates from a legitimate sender (authenticity).
- An attacker could easily flip a bit in the ciphertext, and upon decryption, that bit would also be flipped in the plaintext, leading to a modified message without detection.
- For instance, if C = P ^ K, and an attacker flips the i-th bit of C to C', then C' ^ K will produce P' where only the i-th bit of P is flipped. This can be exploited to subtly alter messages.

When is XOR ‘Acceptable’ (and Why It’s Still Limited)?

The only context where XOR alone achieves theoretical perfect security is with a one-time pad (OTP). As highlighted before, this requires a key that is: Zip lists into dictionary python

Truly random.
As long as the message.
Used only once.
Secretly distributed.

The practical difficulties of meeting these criteria for real-world applications are immense. For example, transmitting a 1 GB file would require securely generating and distributing a 1 GB truly random key, which is often more challenging than transmitting the encrypted data itself. Therefore, OTPs are typically reserved for highly sensitive, low-volume communications (e.g., diplomatic hotlines).

For most other purposes, especially with xor encryption cpp or xor encryption c code that relies on repeating keys, the security is negligible. Any attacker with basic cryptanalysis skills and access to a xor cipher cracker tool can likely recover the plaintext within minutes.

In summary, while XOR is a vital component in modern cryptographic algorithms, its use in a simple, direct manner as an xor encryption scheme is highly vulnerable and should never be used for sensitive data. Robust security requires complex combinations of XOR with non-linear operations, strong key schedules, and secure modes of operation, as seen in industry standards like AES.

`XOR` in `CTF` Challenges: Learning Basic Crypto Vulnerabilities

While xor encryption is not secure for real-world applications, it holds a prominent place in Capture The Flag (CTF) competitions, especially in the cryptography category. In these challenges, xor encryption ctf tasks are designed to test a participant’s understanding of fundamental cryptographic principles, common vulnerabilities, and basic cryptanalysis techniques. They serve as excellent learning tools.

Why XOR is Popular in CTF Cryptography Challenges

Simplicity and Accessibility: Zip two lists python
- The underlying concept of XOR is easy to grasp, making it accessible even to beginners in cryptography.
- The implementation in xor encryption c code or xor encryption cpp is minimal, allowing CTF creators to focus on the cryptographic problem rather than complex programming setups.
Illustrating Key Vulnerabilities:
- CTF challenges often highlight the exact weaknesses that make simple XOR insecure in practice. These include:
  - Known-Plaintext Attack: A common scenario is providing a part of the plaintext (e.g., a file header, a common phrase like “flag{” for flags), which allows participants to recover the key by XORing it with the corresponding ciphertext.
  - Frequency Analysis: For repeating key XOR, participants might be given a long enough ciphertext to perform frequency analysis on character distributions, deduce key length using techniques like the Kasiski examination or index of coincidence, and then recover the key.
  - Key Reuse: Often, multiple messages are encrypted with the same repeating XOR key. This is a massive vulnerability, as (P1 ^ K) ^ (P2 ^ K) = P1 ^ P2. If you XOR two ciphertexts encrypted with the same key, the key cancels out, leaving you with the XOR of the two plaintexts. If one plaintext is partially known or highly structured (e.g., a program, a specific file type), you can often recover the other. This is a very common xor cipher cracker technique in CTF.
Encouraging Scripting and Tooling:
- Solving XOR CTF challenges often requires writing small Python scripts or using existing tools to automate the decryption process (e.g., iterating through possible key lengths, performing frequency analysis). This encourages participants to develop practical scripting skills.
Steganography and Obfuscation:
- Sometimes, XOR is used not for traditional encryption, but for simple obfuscation or as a steganography layer. For example, a small key might be XORed with an image to hide a message, or a piece of malware might XOR its strings to avoid simple static analysis. CTF challenges might present these scenarios.

Common XOR CTF Scenarios and Techniques

“XOR with a single byte key”: The easiest. Try all 256 possible single-byte keys.
“Repeating XOR key, length unknown”:
1. Kasiski Examination: Look for repeating blocks in the ciphertext. The distance between repetitions might be a multiple of the key length.
2. Index of Coincidence (IC): For different assumed key lengths, group characters and calculate the IC. The IC will be higher (closer to the language’s natural IC, e.g., ~0.067 for English) when the guessed key length is correct.
3. Once key length L is found, split the ciphertext into L monoalphabetic substitution ciphertexts.
4. Perform frequency analysis on each of the L streams to find the most probable key character for that stream.
“XOR with Known Plaintext”: Given P_known and C_corresponding. Calculate K = P_known ^ C_corresponding. If the key repeats, this will reveal the entire repeating key.
“XOR Two Ciphertexts (same key)”: Given C1 = P1 ^ K and C2 = P2 ^ K. Calculate C1 ^ C2 = (P1 ^ K) ^ (P2 ^ K) = P1 ^ P2. Now you have the XOR of two plaintexts. If one plaintext is known or has a highly predictable structure, you can often recover the other. This is a potent technique in xor encryption ctf.

While the xor encryption itself is basic, the CTF challenges built around it are invaluable for aspiring security professionals. They offer hands-on experience in recognizing cryptographic weaknesses, applying analytical techniques, and building tools, skills that are transferable to much more complex cryptographic assessments. It teaches participants not just how to implement xor encryption c code, but critically, how to break it.

`XOR Encryption Calculator` and `XOR Cipher Cracker`: Tools and Techniques

The simplicity and inherent weaknesses of basic xor encryption have led to the development of numerous tools. An xor encryption calculator is typically a straightforward utility to perform the XOR operation on input text and a given key. A xor cipher cracker, on the other hand, is designed to break such ciphers, leveraging their vulnerabilities. Group free online games

`XOR Encryption Calculator`

An xor encryption calculator is essentially a simple implementation of the xor_cipher function discussed earlier, often presented as a web-based tool, a command-line utility, or a script. Its purpose is to demonstrate the encryption and decryption process directly.

Features of a typical xor encryption calculator:

Input Fields:
- Plaintext/Ciphertext: A text area to enter the message you want to encrypt or decrypt.
- Key: A field to enter the secret key.
Operation Buttons:
- Encrypt: Performs Plaintext ^ Key = Ciphertext.
- Decrypt: Performs Ciphertext ^ Key = Plaintext.
Output Display:
- Shows the result, often with an option to display it in plain text, hexadecimal, or base64. As discussed, hexadecimal is crucial for non-printable characters.

How it works (internally):
The underlying mechanism is precisely the xor encryption c code logic:
for each byte in input: output_byte = input_byte XOR key_byte_repeated

These calculators are useful for:

Quickly demonstrating the XOR operation.
Debugging simple xor encryption implementations.
Verifying results in CTF challenges where the key is known.
Learning how the xor cipher in c fundamentally works.

`XOR Cipher Cracker`

This is where the real “fun” begins for security enthusiasts. A xor cipher cracker is a tool (often a script written in Python, C, or specialized software) designed to automatically or semi-automatically deduce the key and recover the plaintext from XOR-encrypted ciphertext, exploiting its known weaknesses. Paraphrasing tool no word limit

Common Techniques Employed by XOR Cipher Cracker Tools:

Single-Byte XOR Brute-Forcer:
- For ciphertexts encrypted with a single-byte key (i.e., the same byte is XORed with every character of the plaintext).
- The cracker tries every possible 256 single-byte keys (from 0x00 to 0xFF).
- For each decryption attempt, it typically calculates a “score” based on frequency analysis (e.g., how closely the decrypted text’s character frequencies match those of standard English or whatever language is expected).
- The key that produces the highest score (most probable plaintext) is the likely correct key.
Repeating Key XOR (Vigenere-like) Cracker:
- This is more complex and targets the most common xor encryption weakness in CTFs.
- Key Length Determination:
  - Hamming Distance/Kasiski Examination: The cracker might iterate through possible key lengths (e.g., 2 to 40 bytes). For each length, it takes blocks of ciphertext at that distance (e.g., C[0]C[L]C[2L]...) and calculates properties like the Hamming distance between various blocks or the Index of Coincidence. The key length that yields the lowest average normalized Hamming distance or an IC close to that of the target language is often the correct one.
  - Many online xor cipher cracker tools include this functionality.
- Key Recovery (Per-Byte Frequency Analysis):
  - Once the key length L is determined, the ciphertext is conceptually divided into L separate single-byte XOR problems.
  - For each of these L streams, the cracker performs the single-byte XOR brute-force attack (as above) and frequency analysis to determine the most likely key byte for that position.
  - Combining these L bytes reconstructs the full repeating key.
Known-Plaintext Attack Module:
- If the user provides a snippet of known plaintext that corresponds to a part of the ciphertext, the cracker can simply XOR the known plaintext with the ciphertext snippet to instantly reveal that portion of the key. If the key repeats, this often reveals the entire key.
XOR of Multiple Ciphertexts:
- If multiple ciphertexts were encrypted with the same repeating key, the cracker can XOR them together. This eliminates the key, leaving C1 ^ C2 = P1 ^ P2.
- The cracker then attempts to brute-force or use statistical analysis on P1 ^ P2. If P1 is known or has a specific structure (e.g., all spaces, or a standard file header), P2 can often be recovered.

Tools like xortool (a popular Python script), online xor cipher cracker websites, or custom scripts written for xor encryption ctf challenges are examples of these. They demonstrate concretely why is xor used in cryptography only as a component, and why simple xor encryption with a repeating key is highly breakable and not secure for real applications.

Integrating `XOR Encryption in C++`: Enhancements and Best Practices

While the core logic of xor encryption remains the same, implementing xor encryption in cpp offers opportunities to leverage C++’s features for better code organization, safety, and reusability, especially when compared to raw xor encryption c code. This section will explore these enhancements and discuss best practices for C++ implementations.

Leveraging C++ Features for `XOR Encryption`

String Class (std::string):
- In C, you typically use char* arrays and manage memory manually with strlen, strcpy, malloc, free, etc.
- In C++, std::string automatically handles memory management, length tracking, and provides convenient member functions. This significantly reduces the chances of buffer overflows or memory leaks, common pitfalls in C.
Function Overloading and Templates (Optional for Simplicity):
- While not strictly necessary for simple XOR, C++ allows for function overloading (multiple functions with the same name but different parameters) or templates, which can be useful for more generic cryptographic functions.
Object-Oriented Programming (OOP):
- For more complex ciphers, you might encapsulate the encryption/decryption logic within a class (e.g., XORCipher). This promotes modularity, data hiding, and easier management of state (like keys or modes). For simple XOR, this might be overkill, but it’s a good practice for scalable crypto solutions.
Standard Library Algorithms:
- C++’s <algorithm> header offers functions like std::transform which can be used to apply a transformation to a range of elements. While a simple for loop is often clearest for XOR, std::transform could be an alternative for functional programming styles.

Example `XOR Encryption in C++` Implementation

Here’s how you might write the xor_cipher function using std::string:

#include <iostream> // For std::cout, std::cin
#include <string>   // For std::string
#include <vector>   // Optional: For binary data representation (bytes)
#include <iomanip>  // For std::hex, std::setw, std::setfill

// Function to perform XOR encryption/decryption using std::string
// Returns a new string with the result (does not modify in-place)
std::string xorEncryptDecrypt(const std::string& data, const std::string& key) {
    if (key.empty()) {
        std::cerr << "Error: Key cannot be empty." << std::endl;
        return ""; // Return an empty string or throw an exception
    }

    std::string result = data; // Make a copy of the data to modify

    for (size_t i = 0; i < result.length(); ++i) {
        result[i] = result[i] ^ key[i % key.length()];
    }
    return result;
}

// Helper function to print a string in hexadecimal format
void printHex(const std::string& s) {
    for (char c : s) { // C++11 range-based for loop
        std::cout << std::hex << std::setw(2) << std::setfill('0') << (static_cast<int>(static_cast<unsigned char>(c))) << " ";
    }
    std::cout << std::dec << std::endl; // Reset to decimal for subsequent prints
}

int main() {
    std::string message = "This is a secret message to be encrypted using C++.";
    std::string key = "CppKey123";

    std::cout << "Original message: \"" << message << "\"" << std::endl;
    std::cout << "Using key: \"" << key << "\"" << std::endl;

    // Encrypt
    std::string encrypted_message = xorEncryptDecrypt(message, key);
    std::cout << "\nEncrypted message (Hexadecimal):" << std::endl;
    printHex(encrypted_message);

    // Decrypt
    std::string decrypted_message = xorEncryptDecrypt(encrypted_message, key);
    std::cout << "\nDecrypted message: \"" << decrypted_message << "\"" << std::endl;

    // Demonstrate with non-printable characters or binary data
    std::string binary_data = "\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05"; // Example of binary data
    std::string binary_key = "\xFF";
    std::string encrypted_binary = xorEncryptDecrypt(binary_data, binary_key);
    std::cout << "\nOriginal Binary Data (Hex):" << std::endl;
    printHex(binary_data);
    std::cout << "Encrypted Binary Data (Hex):" << std::endl;
    printHex(encrypted_binary);
    std::string decrypted_binary = xorEncryptDecrypt(encrypted_binary, binary_key);
    std::cout << "Decrypted Binary Data (Hex):" << std::endl;
    printHex(decrypted_binary);


    return 0;
}

Key C++ Enhancements:

std::string: The data and key are const std::string& to avoid unnecessary copying for input. The function returns a new std::string result instead of modifying in place, which is generally safer as it preserves the original data. If in-place modification is strictly desired, std::string& data could be used.
size_t: Used for loop counters and string lengths, which is the correct unsigned integer type for sizes.
Range-based for loop (for (char c : s)): (C++11 and later) Simplifies iterating over characters in a string.
std::cerr: For error messages, good practice to use standard error stream.
std::hex, std::setw, std::setfill: From <iomanip>, these manipulators provide much more robust and flexible formatting for hexadecimal output compared to basic C printf.
- std::setw(2) ensures a field width of 2.
- std::setfill('0') pads with zeros if the hex value is less than 2 digits (e.g., A becomes 0A).
- static_cast<int>(static_cast<unsigned char>(c)) is the C++ way to ensure the character is treated as an unsigned integer before being printed as hex, avoiding sign extension issues.

Best Practices for `XOR Encryption in C++`

Use std::string for Text/Key Data: Unless you’re dealing with raw binary data byte arrays that don’t represent C-style strings (i.e., they might contain null bytes), std::string is usually the superior choice. For arbitrary binary data, std::vector<unsigned char> is often preferred.
Handle Key Length and Empty Keys: Ensure your key is not empty to avoid division-by-zero errors with i % key.length().
Return New String vs. In-Place Modification: For library functions, returning a new std::string (as shown above) is generally safer as it avoids modifying caller’s data unexpectedly. For performance-critical scenarios or when explicit in-place behavior is desired, pass std::string& and modify directly.
Error Handling: Consider throwing exceptions for invalid inputs (e.g., empty key) in more complex applications, rather than just printing to std::cerr.
Beware of Character Encoding: xor encryption works on bytes. If your C++ environment uses multi-byte character encodings (like UTF-8), a char might not represent a full character. For generic binary data, unsigned char or std::byte (C++17) in a std::vector is ideal. For simple ASCII char is often sufficient.
Don’t Use for Production Security: Reiterate that this xor encryption cpp or xor encryption c code is for educational purposes or ctf challenges only. It is not secure for real-world applications. Always rely on established cryptographic libraries (e.g., OpenSSL, Crypto++ for C++) for actual security needs.

By following these practices, your xor encryption in cpp code will be more robust, safer, and adhere to modern C++ coding standards.

FAQs

What is XOR encryption in C?

XOR encryption in C refers to implementing the XOR cipher using the C programming language. It’s a symmetric encryption method where each byte of plaintext is combined with a corresponding byte of a key using the bitwise XOR (^) operation. The key is typically repeated if it’s shorter than the plaintext.

How does the XOR cipher in C work?

The XOR cipher in C works by iterating through the characters of a message and XORing each character’s ASCII value (its byte representation) with a character from a secret key. If the key is shorter than the message, it wraps around (repeats) using the modulo operator (%). Decryption is performed by applying the exact same XOR operation with the same key to the ciphertext, which reverts it back to the original plaintext due to the property A ^ K ^ K = A.

Is XOR encryption secure for real-world use?

No, simple XOR encryption with a repeating key is not secure for real-world use. It is highly vulnerable to known-plaintext attacks and frequency analysis, making it easy for a xor cipher cracker to deduce the key and recover the plaintext. Its primary use is for educational purposes or as a component within more complex, robust algorithms like AES.

Why is XOR used in cryptography despite its insecurity as a standalone cipher?

XOR is used extensively in modern cryptography because it is fast, reversible, and provides excellent diffusion (spreading the influence of one bit over many others) when combined with non-linear operations (like S-boxes) and complex key schedules. It’s a fundamental logical primitive within strong algorithms like AES and various stream ciphers, but it’s never used as the sole encryption method.

What are the main vulnerabilities of simple XOR encryption?

The main vulnerabilities of simple XOR encryption include:

Known-Plaintext Attack: If any part of the plaintext is known, the corresponding part of the key can be easily recovered (Key = Plaintext ^ Ciphertext).
Frequency Analysis: For repeating keys, statistical patterns in the plaintext (like character frequencies) translate into the ciphertext, allowing an attacker to deduce the key.
No Integrity Check: There’s no mechanism to detect if the ciphertext has been tampered with.

How can I implement XOR encryption in C code?

To implement XOR encryption in C code, you typically need a function that takes a character array (the message) and another character array (the key). Inside the function, loop through the message, and for each character data[i], apply data[i] = data[i] ^ key[i % key_len];. Use strlen() to get string lengths.

What is an XOR encryption calculator?

An XOR encryption calculator is a tool (often a web-based utility or a simple program) that allows users to input text and a key, then performs the XOR operation to encrypt or decrypt the text. It’s useful for quick demonstrations and learning the basic mechanics of the XOR cipher.

What is a XOR cipher cracker?

A XOR cipher cracker is a tool or script designed to automatically or semi-automatically break simple XOR ciphers. It typically employs techniques like brute-forcing single-byte keys, frequency analysis for repeating keys, or known-plaintext attacks to recover the original message and the secret key.

Can XOR encryption be used for binary data?

Yes, XOR encryption works on the byte level, so it can be used for any type of binary data (images, executables, etc.), not just text. However, the same security vulnerabilities apply regardless of the data type. When dealing with arbitrary binary data, it’s best to use unsigned char arrays or std::vector<unsigned char> in C++ to avoid issues with signed characters or null bytes.

What is the difference between XOR encryption in C and XOR encryption in C++?

The core XOR logic is identical in C and C++. However, xor encryption in cpp often leverages C++ features like std::string for easier string management, automatic memory handling, and possibly object-oriented design for better modularity, reducing the common pitfalls associated with manual char* and memory management in pure xor encryption c code.

How can I make XOR encryption more secure (theoretically, like OTP)?

Theoretically, XOR encryption can be perfectly secure if used as a One-Time Pad (OTP). This requires a key that is:

Truly random.
At least as long as the message.
Used only once.
Kept absolutely secret and securely distributed.
However, meeting these conditions is extremely challenging in practice, making OTP rarely feasible for general use.

What is the output format for XOR encrypted data?

The output of XOR encryption (the ciphertext) often contains non-printable characters. Therefore, it’s common and recommended to represent the encrypted data in hexadecimal format (e.g., 41 2B C5 FF) rather than trying to print it as a regular string. This ensures all byte values are visible and avoids issues with null terminators or unreadable characters.

Are there any real-world applications where simple XOR is used for security?

Simple, standalone XOR with a repeating key is not used for security in real-world applications due to its weaknesses. However, the XOR operation itself is a fundamental and efficient component within complex, modern cryptographic algorithms (like AES and stream ciphers) where it’s combined with other non-linear transformations to achieve high levels of security.

How is XOR related to CTF (Capture The Flag) challenges?

XOR encryption ctf challenges are very common in CTF competitions. They are used to teach participants fundamental cryptographic vulnerabilities (like known-plaintext attacks, frequency analysis, and key reuse) and basic cryptanalysis techniques, which are essential skills for aspiring cybersecurity professionals.

Can XOR encryption be used for password hashing?

No, XOR encryption should never be used for password hashing. Password hashing requires a one-way, computationally intensive function (like bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2, or PBKDF2) to protect passwords even if the hash database is compromised. XOR is reversible and fast, making it entirely unsuitable for this purpose.

What is the maximum key length for XOR encryption in C?

There’s no theoretical maximum key length for XOR encryption in C other than practical memory limits. However, for a simple repeating XOR cipher, the effective key length is what matters for security. The ideal is a key as long as the message (a one-time pad), but this is rarely practical. Typically, repeating keys are much shorter (e.g., 5-20 bytes), which makes them vulnerable.

Does XOR encryption protect against brute-force attacks?

Simple XOR encryption offers minimal protection against brute-force attacks, especially if the key space is small (e.g., a single-byte key, where only 256 possibilities exist). For repeating keys, brute-force combined with frequency analysis can quickly break the cipher, particularly for natural language plaintexts.

How does the modulo operator (`%`) contribute to XOR encryption?

The modulo operator (%) is crucial in repeating key XOR encryption. It allows the key to wrap around and repeat from the beginning once its length is exhausted. For example, key[i % key_len] ensures that for any i, the correct key character is selected by indexing into the key array cyclically.

What are some alternatives to simple XOR encryption for secure communication?

For secure communication, never use simple XOR. Instead, rely on robust, well-vetted cryptographic algorithms and protocols:

Symmetric Ciphers: AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) in a secure mode of operation (e.g., GCM, CTR).
Asymmetric Ciphers: RSA or ECC for key exchange and digital signatures.
Secure Protocols: TLS/SSL (used in HTTPS), SSH, IPsec.
These systems combine multiple cryptographic primitives, including XOR, in complex ways to provide confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity.

Why is it important to define encryption in cryptography?

Defining encryption in cryptography is crucial because it establishes the core concepts of data confidentiality, the role of algorithms and keys, and distinguishes between readable plaintext and unintelligible ciphertext. Understanding this definition is the first step to appreciating the need for secure communication and the complexities involved in building robust cryptographic systems.undefined

Xor encryption in c